Sione Lauaki rip
-
I think a lot of these 'tributes' focus a bit on his flaws, but it's interesting to have his condition being added to the narrative of why he never achieved more. I guess we'll never know.
This is my favourite tribute piece so far, because it at least talks a little about about Lauaki as a person (not just as a rugby player). However, as far as I can tell it's the only one that acknowledges that test Lauaki had against the Wallabies, which in my memory is one of the worst I've ever seen from an All Black. Poor guy just couldn't get himself out of the quick sand. I'd also forgotten that Foster had named him Chiefs captain. I recall at the time that Lauaki appeared to be self destructing.
In his time he was one of my favourite Chiefs players and I loved watching him and Sivi play for the Pacific Islanders and then the Chiefs. He was involved in those big victories over the Crusaders and Blues, which long suffering Chiefs fans will remember were almost impossible to come by back then... especially vs the Crusaders.
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/sport/news/article.cfm?c_id=4&objectid=11799740
-
Sione Lauaki - Test Tries
-
On the surface Rattatue's comments are probably more mild than those Foster gave on Veitch on Sunday. Foster went so far to say Nick Gill, who was with the Chiefs at the time as a strength and conditioning coach, worked pretty much full time with Lauaki to get him up to speed to the detriment of others.
But I guess the key is the place it is coming from. Rattatue is a an unabashed knocker, Foster obviously had a soft spot for the guy and just wanted him to get it together.
-
-
@MajorRage said in Sione Lauaki rip:
@rotated Clearly, you didn't read the whole article either.
Yeah, I actually did. He paints a picture of him being weak willed rather than unfocused.
It's a lazy piece and only the Rat would end a piece for a passing with "potential lost", who about "life lost?".
Contrast with it with his piece on Sumner.
-
Presumably, this is the same Rattue who thinks that because a region with a high percentage of PIs has a number of them opting to seek greener pastures, that means the Blues is a racist organisation.
-
@antipodean The Blues and the NZRU, mind. Plus the NZRU being based in Wellington is a major fault for the Blues, because if they moved to Auckland it would make a yuge difference.
I got suckered into reading that article and felt dumber for it, at no stage did he appear to make a point, he merely implied racism at the Blues and NZRU and that NZRU is poorly run. Amazing stuff.
-
@Bones said in Sione Lauaki rip:
@antipodean The Blues and the NZRU, mind. Plus the NZRU being based in Wellington is a major fault for the Blues, because if they moved to Auckland it would make a yuge difference.
I got suckered into reading that article and felt dumber for it, at no stage did he appear to make a point, he merely implied racism at the Blues and NZRU and that NZRU is poorly run. Amazing stuff.
Yep - got suckered into it myself... the whole racism thing was an obvious "clickbait" ploy, mentioned once in the first paragraph, and again at the end - nothing to do with the actual article; but no doubt he would claim it was 'ironic' in some way. (Feel free to "fix" that to 'moronic')
Reached the end, read his name at the end of it, and had that "ahh... of course" moment, with what the kids call a "facepalm", or whatever.
Also thought - "can I be arsed searching through all his older shit to find something where he argues the opposite... how franchises needs should always be placed second to the All Blacks?"
Answer was "fuck no".
