NPC Crowds
-
I do think we have to look at price of food or drinks at stadiums.
It is not set by rugby, but by the people who hire the food stalls or bars. Was talking to a fella who had s food outlet at Suncorp, he said he had to make prices higher than in his shop as the cost was so high to do it.
The rent per night was pricey, and you have to set up whole thing including prep etc on day, not like at shop where everything stays there.
I was at Yarrows Stadium on Saturday and women I spoke to while buying some food, said it was their first time there, and didn't know at that stage if they would be back until they looked at profit etc.
At local grounds , I think the use of local park is often almost nothing, and often a local club has clubrooms there to buy beers from , and food caravans are charged bugger all if anything. -
@Hooroo said in NPC Crowds:
The entertainment product of NPC died a very very long time ago and now only die hard support it onsite. That wanes every year a bit more
The fact that when the minnow type teams do splendidly and get the crowds, it suggests that maybe it should be played more provincially in smaller town stadiums.
When Waikato played a preseason shield game at Matamata, it was chocka. It suited the product
This. The issues about TV, food, booze etc discussed below can be solved - but if they want the product to get bums on seats this is the obvious way of doing it and getting better diversity in crowds.
You give out free tickets to any kid from the local rugby club(s) - but they need to attend with a paying adult.
-
The issue is that it is being played while the All Blacks are playing and everyone including the players know it is completely irrelevant to the team. It doesn't matter how well any player plays in it will be written off as irrelevant. Over on the All Black thread someone said Narawa played well at centre over the weekend and immediately someone said 'it is only the NPC'. The All Blacks lost a test over the weekend but any poster would be ridiculed for arguing solutions to the loss lay in what they saw in the NPC.
The only relevance it now has in terms of high performance NZ rugby is giving established All Black contenders game time before returning. Not even sure it is that relevant to making Super rugby squads anymore to be honest as someone like Taha Kemara has a contract and Lincoln McClutchie does not.
-
@tubbyj I think it got huge relevance for super rugby , even if players do go elsewhere like McClutchie etc . It a great stepping stone, I look in the Naki team at Daniel Rona, Josh Jacomb, Meiha Grindlay, Naholo ,Kneepkens in backline, they would be not playing at moment with no NPC. Forwards are exactly same. Even in backline . Good percentage of our forward pack is the same, Ricitelli,Slater, Boshier etc same thing.
I genuinely think NPC will be trimmed by a couple of teams, but god help us if the comp ever stopped, we would lose a hell of a lot more players overseas. And our Super teams would suffer big time in about 4-5 years time.I rerally think we have to realise the whole corwd thing isn't just a NPC thing. We have had posts of how wonderful it used to be when stadiums were full etc. That exact same thing is in Super rugby too, crowds aren't what they were. It is so easy to sit at home or in bar to watch rugby, or any sports.
-
Not to go down this road again, but them playing is not a 'stepping stone' in that it helps them get discovered or acts as a bridge between Club rugby and Super - most of them were signed to a Super academy (or another academy) very early, so it's a place for them to play - we all agree that we need our next generation playing at a reasonable level of rugby going across the year. The question is of course, this disconnect between Super academy to NPC then back to Super, with NPC academies thrown in too.
I think Rona is the only example there of what you are talking about (i.e., using it as a stepping stone). The others were already in the system.
Josh Jacomb Auckland
Meihana Grindlay Blues
Kini Naholo Chiefs
Kneepkens Chiefs -
@gt12 yep mate I not meaning for finding players. But I genuinely believe the players in general need a playing stepping stone, and it's something Barnes the Naki coach talks about.
Not taking away from fact that academies find young players etc, but I truly believe they learn a hell of a lot more on the field playing a higher and more experienced players. In actual fact I don't think many NPC teams have academies as such, they just come through a general age grade system rep teams. so basically we agre on the need for higher level rugby.
But really this thread is discussing crowds more than the comp.
As I say I a real fan of NPC, think it a great comp, and like anything when we talking about crowds , I think we all will find excuse to go to the games or not go to games. As I said I comfortable with those who choose to stay home, as they find it easier, or more comfortable. -
@gt12 Just one other thing mate for stepping stones, I have a mate who's grandson was in Chiefs academy, didn't crack a NPC team on regular basis and so never made it into super squad. So really seems in general is a stepping stone between academy and super?
He is looking at perhaps USA or Europe to get contract (at 2nd tier etc) -
So, two potential issues here:
- he isn't good enough
- the current system doesn’t have sufficient alignment to develop talent
I know I agree with one of those.
Btw, you look at the Taranaki team and very few of their young stars (3/5 you mentioned I think) seem to actually be from Taranaki, so the NPC teams are just working as feeder clubs for the cities anyway.
Edit: I bring this up as one issue with crowds is that many of these guys in the competition are ring-ins from other places. The actual local connection is more and more frayed every year.
-
@gt12 Rona, Grindlay and JRK are all Taranaki products.
As someone who sees a lot of 1st XV rugby, particularly Super 8 and CNI, I get to see a lot of the players who now play in the NPC (and SR and ABs). It's also one of the reasons I am happy to see PUs promote local talent instead of signing someone from Aust or Europe.
So for me there is a provincial connection. I acknowledge I will be in the minority.
-
@Bovidae said in NPC Crowds:
@gt12 Rona, Grindlay and JRK are all Taranaki products.
As someone who sees a lot of 1st XV rugby, particularly Super 8 and CNI, I get to see a lot of the players who now play in the NPC (and SR and ABs). It's also one of the reasons I am happy to see PUs promote local talent instead of signing someone from Aust or Europe.
So for me there is a provincial connection. I acknowledge I will be in the minority.
Apologies, i didn’t realize Grindlay left and returned.
I like the idea of a ‘local’ connection, but this model just doesn’t work.
And now the gap between NPC > Super > International is getting wider.
I think the crowds will show up for the right product, but right now the product isn’t that. In the short term I think they can just address the location of games to give relevance, but the bigger issues remain.
-
@gt12 said in NPC Crowds:
So, two potential issues here:
- he isn't good enough
- the current system doesn’t have sufficient alignment to develop talent
I know I agree with one of those.
Btw, you look at the Taranaki team and very few of their young stars (3/5 you mentioned I think) seem to actually be from Taranaki, so the NPC teams are just working as feeder clubs for the cities anyway.
Edit: I bring this up as one issue with crowds is that many of these guys in the competition are ring-ins from other places. The actual local connection is more and more frayed every year.
Actually a lot of provincial teams are feeder clubs for city academies mate Perofeta is actually a Wanganui boy, Grindlay is a kid from Manaia. It all gets complicated because of scholarships etc. I mean of course NPC teams (like super teams) get players from outside etc.
As I say I genuinely believe it a great stepping stone between club and super rugby, same as I believe super is stepping stone to test rugby.
On mates grandson, no he obviously wasn't good enough to make NPC teams, but is my point, was good enough to make academy etc.. If we actually followed your point of though of course we probably shouldn't botther with club rugby, just pick kids from school and put them in academies?
We probably just see things in different light, you anti NPC and I pro NPC mate. And nothing I say will convince you it is important for players to have different levels of rugby to develop, and nothing you say will convince me of opposite. So I will just continue to watch and enjoy it, and you can do other, and no problems for either really is it? -
@gt12 said in NPC Crowds:
@Bovidae said in NPC Crowds:
@gt12 Rona, Grindlay and JRK are all Taranaki products.
As someone who sees a lot of 1st XV rugby, particularly Super 8 and CNI, I get to see a lot of the players who now play in the NPC (and SR and ABs). It's also one of the reasons I am happy to see PUs promote local talent instead of signing someone from Aust or Europe.
So for me there is a provincial connection. I acknowledge I will be in the minority.
Apologies, i didn’t realize Grindlay left and returned.
I like the idea of a ‘local’ connection, but this model just doesn’t work.
And now the gap between NPC > Super > International is getting wider.
I think the crowds will show up for the right product, but right now the product isn’t that. In the short term I think they can just address the location of games to give relevance, but the bigger issues remain.
I agree there are issues with it , but really the big thing is with crowds I genuinely think it more about the ease of watching on tv and a generation who have found that's easiest way to watch sport.
-
i think the NPC needs to be appreciated and marketed as something to enjoy and celebrate in its own right, we dont go watch a club game just because we might see some up and comer, its enjoyable in it own right, stand in the sun with a beer somewhere often close to home and therefore easy.....all the talk is about how the NPC connects in with other comps or player progression...makes the games seem like training sessions and therefore not something very important
-
@Kiwiwomble I suppose could say the same with super. I genuinely think those that follow the NPC do so because they support their team, and not just there t0 see players who will go higher, but as with super any team you support (and at club level) you want players from your team to step up to next level. Well I do and most I speak to do.
I do think games we watch as a neutral is probably where you got more interest on who will step up. I have commented a few times on Otago and Southland and how happy Jamie Joseph will be etc, though Southern man ,yourself etc would no doubt be looking at how team going against rivals and ladder etc first.
The comp can be enjoyed for more then one reason I think.
I can assure you I at most Naki games and crowd is there to watch the Naki win firstly and foremost! -
@gt12 said in NPC Crowds:
So, two potential issues here:
- he isn't good enough
- the current system doesn’t have sufficient alignment to develop talent
I know I agree with one of those.
Btw, you look at the Taranaki team and very few of their young stars (3/5 you mentioned I think) seem to actually be from Taranaki, so the NPC teams are just working as feeder clubs for the cities anyway.
Edit: I bring this up as one issue with crowds is that many of these guys in the competition are ring-ins from other places. The actual local connection is more and more frayed every year.
Is it any worse now than it was back in the day?
Recently the 2000 NPC final has been talked up on the forum somewhere and the Welly v Canty teams that contested that match had lots of non locals.
On a rough count 10 of the starting Wellington team and 9 of the starting Canterbury team weren't locals.
In last years final 8 of the starting Pies team were locals. I assume the Naki had a lot of locals too.
-
Its certainly much worse than back in the day if You mean 1993 when we challenged for the shield. Even then the big teams (Auckland) were robbing the provinces of talent though.
On your point, I’d make the argument that in the 2000s the competition was already in decline and that efforts to strengthen the relationship between the NPC to local rugby have been pretty weak and relatively ineffective.
I had a quick look to see if I could find any data on attendance figures and funnily enough it turned up articles from the mid 2000s highlighting exactly the same discussion we are having now. The inability for NZ rugby to develop its systems over time is the real scandal here, but that gets us back to ground we’ve covered in other places to death.
With that in mind, on the current topic, my feeling is that if Waikato played games at places like Te Rapa, Matamata, TA (of course!), and other local communities they might be able to reduce the costs of running games and get more locals out. However, I think Dan is right - it is easy to just stop things and turn on the Telly so its not just the monetary cost, there has to be a reason to get people out and I’m not sure if location alone will do it.
-
@gt12
Yes
in the amateur days Auck, Well, Cant poached players from the country provs.
And Otago had the Varsity PE faculty. Otago University club produced a huge number of All Blacks.
Not saying its the way to go, but amateur rugby was pretty good! -
The heyday of the modern NPC was in the 1980s and 1990s when there was no SR, or its earlier iterations were merely pre-season games. The competition was played after club rugby so was the only show in town. I remember going to games where Waikato B or the U21s played in the curtain-raiser. It's SR that has fucked everything up, and NZR has allowed that to happen with little foresight and planning.
-
@gt12 said in NPC Crowds:
Its certainly much worse than back in the day if You mean 1993 when we challenged for the shield. Even then the big teams (Auckland) were robbing the provinces of talent though.
On your point, I’d make the argument that in the 2000s the competition was already in decline and that efforts to strengthen the relationship between the NPC to local rugby have been pretty weak and relatively ineffective.
I had a quick look to see if I could find any data on attendance figures and funnily enough it turned up articles from the mid 2000s highlighting exactly the same discussion we are having now. The inability for NZ rugby to develop its systems over time is the real scandal here, but that gets us back to ground we’ve covered in other places to death.
With that in mind, on the current topic, my feeling is that if Waikato played games at places like Te Rapa, Matamata, TA (of course!), and other local communities they might be able to reduce the costs of running games and get more locals out. However, I think Dan is right - it is easy to just stop things and turn on the Telly so its not just the monetary cost, there has to be a reason to get people out and I’m not sure if location alone will do it.
Yeah, the 'big' teams were robbing the provinces back then, that 1993 team had a bunch of them who were from elsewhere and played provincial rugby before representing Waikato - Purvis, Jerram, Buck Anderson, Bitchell, Cooper, Warlow, Miller.
Also the Auckland team only appears to have a couple of Brooke's and a Sotutu from outside the area,.
But agree with yours and Dan's point about it's easy to watch it on TV. I don't necessarily agree with the contention that NZ systems are totally shit. The same systems oversaw one of our most successful periods, and even in our supposed worst ever period we were an inch (and some shit reffing) away from pulling off a RWC win with the Fern acknowledged worst coach, nay, worst person to ever walk the earth as coach.
The biggest dent has been the Saffas going north, and that was really out of our hands despite what the Saffas , their media, and some posters say.
-
