• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

Black Caps v Australia

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
cricket
1.1k Posts 49 Posters 105.1k Views
Black Caps v Australia
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • RapidoR Offline
    RapidoR Offline
    Rapido
    wrote on last edited by Rapido
    #1044

    If the 9 dropped catches stat from earlier in thread is correct , and for this test series only. So, making some big assumptions ...

    Out of 37 dismissals. 24 were catches.

    Don't know if Blundell dropped any of them. Assuming they are 9 dropped outfield catches. 7 of the 24 catches taken in series were by the keeper.

    So, possibly that is 9 dropped and 17 taken outfield catches?

    B 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • B Offline
    B Offline
    bayimports
    replied to Rapido on last edited by
    #1045

    @Rapido I'm alarmed that this does not have people more upset. Sure a few happen.. but nine lol, this is terrible

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurph
    replied to Chris on last edited by
    #1046

    @Chris said in Black Caps v Australia:

    A bowling attack of Henry,O'Rourke,Sears backed by Santner as we need some one to hold an end down when the ball is old and Phillips is now a genuine option.

    Could Nathan Smith also be an option? Pretty good new ball bowler? Handy bat.

    ChrisC 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ChrisC Offline
    ChrisC Offline
    Chris
    replied to KiwiMurph on last edited by
    #1047

    @KiwiMurph said in Black Caps v Australia:

    @Chris said in Black Caps v Australia:

    A bowling attack of Henry,O'Rourke,Sears backed by Santner as we need some one to hold an end down when the ball is old and Phillips is now a genuine option.

    Could Nathan Smith also be an option? Pretty good new ball bowler? Handy bat.

    Maybe good Cricketer maybe an allrounder option.
    I don’t think he is an all out test strike bowler like the others I mentioned.

    KiwiMurphK 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurph
    replied to Chris on last edited by KiwiMurph
    #1048

    @Chris Ah cheers. Sounds like competing with Santner/Scotty K then

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT Crusader
    wrote on last edited by
    #1049

    Was hopeful but not optimistic heading into the days play given who Oz had at the crease, the way their tail plays these days and the fact that the wicket was only getting better for the batting side.

    Agree with others that the biggest disappointment is the dropped catches. We simply do not have enough class (with the ball and bat) to drop catches. In my view we need take 90-95% of catching opportunities plus have a bit of luck go our way to be really in it.

    Kudos to Henry for winning player of the series. Not bad in a 0-2 result. Time we found some proper support for him to really flourish rather than flash in the pan because we heap the pressure on him.

    barbarianB 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • canefanC Online
    canefanC Online
    canefan
    replied to Chris on last edited by canefan
    #1050

    @Chris said in Black Caps v Australia:

    We were always 70/80 runs short, with Southee leading the attack we are just treading water with an inability to strike as often as we needed to.
    A bowling attack of Henry,O'Rourke,Sears backed by Santner as we need some one to hold an end down when the ball is old and Phillips is now a genuine option.That attack could bowl sides out cheaply, Jamieson when back then we have the option of bowling 4 quicks and not playing Santner.
    Sorry Timmy but you are just wasting the new ball now time to gracefully retire.

    I don't think Tim will go on his own. And I think NZC are too spineless to fire Stead. Only hope is Stead walks, a new coach comes in and, like Hesson before him, picks a new Captain and demotes Tim. It was always an odd selection choice, considering that Latham had been the 2IC for several seasons and was the logical choice to take the job when Kane gave it up. This is going to hold up any recovery for some time IMHO

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • barbarianB Offline
    barbarianB Offline
    barbarian
    replied to ACT Crusader on last edited by
    #1051

    Man you all sound like Wallaby fans. I understand it innately but it's just such loser talk. Stuff like:

    @ACT-Crusader said in Black Caps v Australia:

    Was hopeful but not optimistic heading into the days play given who Oz had at the crease, the way their tail plays these days and the fact that the wicket was only getting better for the batting side.

    I'm sorry but you had Australia 5/80 chasing 280. You've just got to win that game. Even at 7/220 you still should have won. Pitch wasn't a minefield but it was far from a road.

    It's like Wallaby fans like me who are shitting themselves when they are up by 24 points midway through the second half, then going 'well you just have to tip your hats to the ABs' when they inevitably capitulate and lose by 12.

    No, you don't have to tip your fucking hat to them, that's what got us into this mess in the first place. It's loser talk and if you let it linger it starts to seep into the carpet, and then the walls, and then you are stuck with it forever.

    So take this as the compliment it's meant to be - you choked that. Hard. You are a way better side than that and you just can't allow it to keep happening. I've got a therapist you can talk to who's done wonders with me and a few of my Wallaby fan mates - can DM their number if needed.

    KiwiMurphK ACT CrusaderA 2 Replies Last reply
    7
  • 1kiwi1 Offline
    1kiwi1 Offline
    1kiwi
    wrote on last edited by
    #1052

    Fancy Daryl Mitchell saying after the match that "we won't be defined by our results'
    WTF of course the team is defined by their results

    NTAN 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurph
    replied to barbarian on last edited by
    #1053

    @barbarian said in Black Caps v Australia:

    So take this as the compliment it's meant to be - you choked that. Hard. You are a way better side than that

    'You are a way better side than that'

    No they aren't.

    Southee is on fumes and SK ain't a test player.

    That's two fifths of the attack.

    nzzpN MN5M barbarianB B 4 Replies Last reply
    4
  • nzzpN Offline
    nzzpN Offline
    nzzp
    replied to KiwiMurph on last edited by
    #1054

    @KiwiMurph said in Black Caps v Australia:

    That's two fifths of the attack.

    It's half our attack - we just got lucky with GP turning into a proper spinner for a while

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • MN5M Online
    MN5M Online
    MN5
    replied to KiwiMurph on last edited by
    #1055

    @KiwiMurph said in Black Caps v Australia:

    @barbarian said in Black Caps v Australia:

    So take this as the compliment it's meant to be - you choked that. Hard. You are a way better side than that

    'You are a way better side than that'

    No they aren't.

    Southee is on fumes and SK ain't a test player.

    That's two fifths of the attack.

    SK bowled THREE overs ?!?!?

    Fucken hell that is ridiculously embarrassing for a frontline seamer

    BovidaeB 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • NTAN Offline
    NTAN Offline
    NTA
    replied to 1kiwi on last edited by
    #1056

    @1kiwi said in Black Caps v Australia:

    Fancy Daryl Mitchell saying after the match that "we won't be defined by our results'
    WTF of course the team is defined by their results

    That's some real Bazball thinking

    MN5M 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • MN5M Online
    MN5M Online
    MN5
    replied to NTA on last edited by
    #1057

    @NTA said in Black Caps v Australia:

    @1kiwi said in Black Caps v Australia:

    Fancy Daryl Mitchell saying after the match that "we won't be defined by our results'
    WTF of course the team is defined by their results

    That's some real Bazball thinking

    4-1 in India but I’m sure they played some entertaining cricket

    nzzpN 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • barbarianB Offline
    barbarianB Offline
    barbarian
    replied to KiwiMurph on last edited by
    #1058

    @KiwiMurph said in Black Caps v Australia:

    @barbarian said in Black Caps v Australia:

    So take this as the compliment it's meant to be - you choked that. Hard. You are a way better side than that

    'You are a way better side than that'

    No they aren't.

    Southee is on fumes and SK ain't a test player.

    That's two fifths of the attack.

    This is still roughly the same team that won the World Test Championship. By the standards of test cricket you'd only have them behind India and Australia. That may say more about the standard of test cricket than the Black Caps, but still...

    MN5M mariner4lifeM 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • B Offline
    B Offline
    bayimports
    replied to KiwiMurph on last edited by
    #1059

    @KiwiMurph said in Black Caps v Australia:

    @barbarian said in Black Caps v Australia:

    So take this as the compliment it's meant to be - you choked that. Hard. You are a way better side than that

    'You are a way better side than that'

    No they aren't.

    Southee is on fumes and SK ain't a test player.

    That's two fifths of the attack.

    nah, they choked. 9 dropped catches. Even with tweedle dee and tweedle dum they still could have won. Yes, those two handicapped the team further but we still found a way to lose.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • MN5M Online
    MN5M Online
    MN5
    replied to barbarian on last edited by
    #1060

    @barbarian said in Black Caps v Australia:

    @KiwiMurph said in Black Caps v Australia:

    @barbarian said in Black Caps v Australia:

    So take this as the compliment it's meant to be - you choked that. Hard. You are a way better side than that

    'You are a way better side than that'

    No they aren't.

    Southee is on fumes and SK ain't a test player.

    That's two fifths of the attack.

    This is still roughly the same team that won the World Test Championship. By the standards of test cricket you'd only have them behind India and Australia. That may say more about the standard of test cricket than the Black Caps, but still...

    Southee has declined and Boult, Wags and Jamieson aren’t there.

    Taylor, CDGH and Watling have retired, Conway is injured.

    I think you’re delirious with victory celebrations…..

    1 Reply Last reply
    6
  • mariner4lifeM Online
    mariner4lifeM Online
    mariner4life
    replied to barbarian on last edited by
    #1061

    @barbarian said in Black Caps v Australia:

    @KiwiMurph said in Black Caps v Australia:

    @barbarian said in Black Caps v Australia:

    So take this as the compliment it's meant to be - you choked that. Hard. You are a way better side than that

    'You are a way better side than that'

    No they aren't.

    Southee is on fumes and SK ain't a test player.

    That's two fifths of the attack.

    This is still roughly the same team that won the World Test Championship. By the standards of test cricket you'd only have them behind India and Australia. That may say more about the standard of test cricket than the Black Caps, but still...

    pfft ahahaha you're waaaaay off base there

    did they have the same crest on their shirts? yes. is it the same team? absolutely not.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • nzzpN Offline
    nzzpN Offline
    nzzp
    replied to MN5 on last edited by
    #1062

    @MN5 said in Black Caps v Australia:

    @NTA said in Black Caps v Australia:

    @1kiwi said in Black Caps v Australia:

    Fancy Daryl Mitchell saying after the match that "we won't be defined by our results'
    WTF of course the team is defined by their results

    That's some real Bazball thinking

    4-1 in India but I’m sure they played some entertaining cricket

    I'll fight you bastards on this one.

    Won the first test.

    Competitive to having an advantage in two of the next three.

    Pumped in the last test.

    They did very well for a team touring India. Toughest place in the world to tour.

    mariner4lifeM MN5M 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • mariner4lifeM Online
    mariner4lifeM Online
    mariner4life
    replied to nzzp on last edited by
    #1063

    @nzzp said in Black Caps v Australia:

    @MN5 said in Black Caps v Australia:

    @NTA said in Black Caps v Australia:

    @1kiwi said in Black Caps v Australia:

    Fancy Daryl Mitchell saying after the match that "we won't be defined by our results'
    WTF of course the team is defined by their results

    That's some real Bazball thinking

    4-1 in India but I’m sure they played some entertaining cricket

    I'll fight you bastards on this one.

    Won the first test.

    Competitive to having an advantage in two of the next three.

    Pumped in the last test.

    They did very well for a team touring India. Toughest place in the world to tour.

    onya Stokesy (or is it michael vaughan?) keep fighting the good fight mate

    nzzpN 1 Reply Last reply
    2

Black Caps v Australia
Sports Talk
cricket
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.