The Current State of Rugby
-
@Kiwiwomble said in The Current State of Rugby:
thats why fixing the game is such a tough idea
Indeed it is.
When you put words like "deliberate" in any law you are asking for trouble. It is almost impossible to prove intent, we aren't mind readers. NZ tax law is full of "intent" wording and an absolute minefield.
For deliberate knock ons - Intercepts are exciting they add to the drama. Detering players from having a crack and sending them off is fucked (in my opinion of course). Leave the onus on the passer not to give the opposition a sniff at it.
How many times have we seen a player pass to an AR or into the crowd? If it was in the last second of the game, and you are ahead, a kick to touch could be charged, you "pass" it out. Was it thrown out? Deliberately? SBW knocked one dead a while back, (probably forgot which code he was playing) if he had fumbled it dead, it would have been O.K. It was obvious in that case, but should it be an interpretation? That's where league is getting it right and union wrong. Let them do it, in this case anyway. You can run into touch, kick into touch, but not pass into touch, or it's a penalty. A bit random isn't it?
Just clearer, less ambiguous laws, would be a start. Refs have hard enough time without leaving it up to them to decide if something was deliberate. Only one person knows what was intended and FFS leave thirty guys on the field, sort out thuggery separately.
-
I've banged on a bout it heaps, but rugby's problem is, so much stuff is legal right up until it's not. Hand in the ruck is the best illustration. But there are so many infringements in the game that are completely reliant on the referees judgement, around timing, around angle, around intent. You simply cannot expect consistency between referees when these things happen at speed.
And all VAR has done is move the judgement from one guy to another guy. A guy looking at things in slow motion, which actually distorts everything.
League has the advantage that it is a very very simple game. And the only place that judgement comes in to it is the strip. This black and white view though has led to some stupid outcomes, mainly around obstruction. But it is a far simpler game to referee.
Rugby will never be this simple because it is a constant contest
-
@Snowy said in The Current State of Rugby:
@Kiwiwomble said in The Current State of Rugby:
thats why fixing the game is such a tough idea
Indeed it is.
When you put words like "deliberate" in any law you are asking for trouble. It is almost impossible to prove intent, we aren't mind readers. NZ tax law is full of "intent" wording and an absolute minefield.
For deliberate knock ons - Intercepts are exciting they add to the drama. Detering players from having a crack and sending them off is fucked (in my opinion of course). Leave the onus on the passer not to give the opposition a sniff at it.
How many times have we seen a player pass to an AR or into the crowd? If it was in the last second of the game, and you are ahead, a kick to touch could be charged, you "pass" it out. Was it thrown out? Deliberately? SBW knocked one dead a while back, (probably forgot which code he was playing) if he had fumbled it dead, it would have been O.K. It was obvious in that case, but should it be an interpretation? That's where league is getting it right and union wrong. Let them do it, in this case anyway. You can run into touch, kick into touch, but not pass into touch, or it's a penalty. A bit random isn't it?
Just clearer, less ambiguous laws, would be a start. Refs have hard enough time without leaving it up to them to decide if something was deliberate. Only one person knows what was intended and FFS leave thirty guys on the field, sort out thuggery separately.
agreed on all counts, leave lots of stuff up to the players to attack or defend better rather than using the laws to try (fail) to do it
-
@mariner4life I agree with what you're saying, and I wasn't suggesting that union got dumbed down to league levels (tongue firmly in cheek) , merely that league has got some things right that union could use. Probably too arrogant to do so, but some simplification wouldn't be too hard. I have even given a couple of examples.
-
You'll never get enough buy in
If you go to other parts of rugby social media fans from other jurisdictions want more cards, and are more than happy with the current state of affairs.
-
@Victor-Meldrew said in The Current State of Rugby:
Supporters (some of). Maybe a transitory thing but there seems to be way too much tribalism creeping in with booing and taunting the players. Not to be confused with passion, groaning at a decision or chanting/singing support for your team. Twickenham was appalling 10-15 years ago for this but the atmosphere has been great recently with maybe more passion than ever.
I'm confused, you start off by saying times are bad, but end up saying it's great?
Anyway, supporters seem as good as ever. The pre RWC final warm up at twickers had a fantastic atmosphere. Bit of banter as you'd expect, but good spirits all around.
Mind you, might have been different if the scorecard was reversed...
-
@Bones said in The Current State of Rugby:
I'm confused, you start off by saying times are bad,
I'll explain. I started off saying what I think is wrong with the game and then split it down into sections.
but end up saying it's great?
On supporters, my main point was there was too much tribalism creeping in. I also said some supporters were as good as ever and Twickenham has done a great job in cleaning up most of the shit behaviour we've had there in the past.
-
@Snowy said in The Current State of Rugby:
@Victor-Meldrew said in The Current State of Rugby:
It has the fun missing from the top-level 15 man game
Normally I would agree with you, but it lacks a lot of the (now well documented on here) frustration as well.
As @Machpants has now mentioned.
I'm agreeing with you @Machpants! I'm saying 7s has all the fun that's missing from the 15 man game
-
@mariner4life said in The Current State of Rugby:
You'll never get enough buy in
If you go to other parts of rugby social media fans from other jurisdictions want more cards, and are more than happy with the current state of affairs.
I'm certain that will change as soon as they're on the receiving end. And then I hope it doesn't.
-
@antipodean said in The Current State of Rugby:
@mariner4life said in The Current State of Rugby:
You'll never get enough buy in
If you go to other parts of rugby social media fans from other jurisdictions want more cards, and are more than happy with the current state of affairs.
I'm certain that will change as soon as they're on the receiving end. And then I hope it doesn't.
@mariner4life well if they want more cards the upside is that I will end up watching svns anyway (fuck that is stupid, are "e"s expensive or something?). The number of cards mean that union games (can't calls them "matches" as it implies an even contest) seem to be down to league numbers on the field, so they might as well keep going.
If @antipodean is correct, then until it happens to these other social media fans, rugby union 15s has fallen completely off my list of pleasurable pastimes.
-
Boks to play Portugal in July. This is good news for the smaller countries - hope the other Tier One nations follow suit.
Springboks host two-Test series v Ireland and historic clash with Portugal
World Cup holders South Africa will face Ireland in a two-Test series on home soil next July before facing Portugal for the first time in their history.
-
Warren Gatland: The changes I would make to rugby in 2024
Kicking often at the World Cup was a successful strategy but it needs to change.
-
@Tim said in The Current State of Rugby:
Warren Gatland: The changes I would make to rugby in 2024
Kicking often at the World Cup was a successful strategy but it needs to change.
Love Gatland, but that is muddled, contradictory thinking.
Too much kicking in the game in one breath, and then 'remove the mark' in the next.
If you remove the mark we'll see more not less kicking.
-
-
@sparky said in The Current State of Rugby:
I've not really watched any Rugby since the Rugby World Cup. Maybe I'll get back into it when the 6 Nations and Super Rugby roll around, but at the moment I'm not missing it.
Must admit at end of WC I thought I was ready for a break. That lasted about a week-10 days and then started back watching Galagher championship etc etc.
I suspect I have a slight rugby problem. -
Don't mind his proposals generally.
- Expanding 50:22 forces space for attack.
- reducing subs increases fatigue
- admitting the goal line drop-out is a fail allows sides to attack the line
Agree with Mike above about removing the mark. Not sure what that gains.
Another change I'd like to see a change to the free kick. Allow fks to be kicked directly to touch on the full and award the lineout where it crosses to touch. Teams often have little option but to reset a scrum when a fk is awarded with resultant time lost. Allowing them to clear and contest a lineout should cut down some scrum resets. IMO.
-
@booboo said in The Current State of Rugby:
Another change I'd like to see a change to the free kick. Allow fks to be kicked directly to touch on the full and award the lineout where it crosses to touch. Teams often have little option but to reset a scrum when a fk is awarded with resultant time lost. Allowing them to clear and contest a lineout should cut down some scrum resets. IMO.
Unless they get the throw in I don't imagine teams would kick to touch very often from a free kick.
-
@Crazy-Horse said in The Current State of Rugby:
@booboo said in The Current State of Rugby:
Another change I'd like to see a change to the free kick. Allow fks to be kicked directly to touch on the full and award the lineout where it crosses to touch. Teams often have little option but to reset a scrum when a fk is awarded with resultant time lost. Allowing them to clear and contest a lineout should cut down some scrum resets. IMO.
Unless they get the throw in I don't imagine teams would kick to touch very often from a free kick.
Yeah, thought about that. I reckon plenty of teams would.
- Teams still look to clear from inside their own half: takes you out of the scoring zone.
- Forcing a defensive lineout would often result in getting the ball back in an attacking position (missed touch, or even kicked to touch in a better position than where fk was but now with your throw).
-
@MiketheSnow said in The Current State of Rugby:
@Tim said in The Current State of Rugby:
Warren Gatland: The changes I would make to rugby in 2024
Kicking often at the World Cup was a successful strategy but it needs to change.
Love Gatland, but that is muddled, contradictory thinking.
Too much kicking in the game in one breath, and then 'remove the mark' in the next.
If you remove the mark we'll see more not less kicking.
I thought about removing the mark etc, not a fan, but I can see what he's getting at, like the 50-22 won't it hold defence back? If someone put's up a kick you will need to know you got at least one player back to help your last man as he can't take a mark, so would actually (like the 50-22) mean less players up in front line defence?
-
Seems the Professional Victims from Jaapland have found a way to be picked on by it.
Suddenly I'm a fan of removing the mark.
Wales head coach Warren Gatland has made some proposals which he thinks will improve the game, two of which would hamper the world champion Springboks.
