• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

CWC - Black Caps v Pakistan

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
cricket
167 Posts 21 Posters 3.5k Views
CWC - Black Caps v Pakistan
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.
    replied to MN5 on last edited by Chris B.
    #153

    @MN5 said in CWC - Black Caps v Pakistan:

    The Black Caps are far too limited in their bowling attack to go deep into this comp. There I said it…..which is a shame cos the batting is strong as fuck.

    Yeah - unlikely to be good enough and an obvious step down from India and Oz.

    I've got no idea which three seamers we should play. But, playing Ish is not the answer.

    I guess if you bat first and post a big enough score there's a chance anyone will fall over against you.

    MN5M canefanC 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • KiwiMurphK Online
    KiwiMurphK Online
    KiwiMurph
    replied to SBW1 on last edited by
    #154

    @SBW1 said in CWC - Black Caps v Pakistan:

    Are we still in the World Cup after this game?

    Due to net run rate yes - but it's academic really - there's 3 gun sides and then the 4th side will be making up the numbers in the semi whoever it is

    L 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • MN5M Online
    MN5M Online
    MN5
    replied to Chris B. on last edited by
    #155

    @Chris-B said in CWC - Black Caps v Pakistan:

    @MN5 said in CWC - Black Caps v Pakistan:

    The Black Caps are far too limited in their bowling attack to go deep into this comp. There I said it…..which is a shame cos the batting is strong as fuck.

    Yeah - unlikely to be good enough and an obvious step down from India and Oz.

    I've got no idea which three seamers we should play. But, playing Ish is not the answer.

    I guess if you bat first and post a big enough score there's a chance anyone will fall over against you.

    I thought that score against Pakistan would be more than enough, especially against a team so prone to self destructing as they are.

    Not the case remotely. They looked completely untroubled.

    Chris B.C 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.
    replied to MN5 on last edited by
    #156

    @MN5 said in CWC - Black Caps v Pakistan:

    @Chris-B said in CWC - Black Caps v Pakistan:

    @MN5 said in CWC - Black Caps v Pakistan:

    The Black Caps are far too limited in their bowling attack to go deep into this comp. There I said it…..which is a shame cos the batting is strong as fuck.

    Yeah - unlikely to be good enough and an obvious step down from India and Oz.

    I've got no idea which three seamers we should play. But, playing Ish is not the answer.

    I guess if you bat first and post a big enough score there's a chance anyone will fall over against you.

    I thought that score against Pakistan would be more than enough, especially against a team so prone to self destructing as they are.

    Not the case remotely. They looked completely untroubled.

    So did I.

    So did Ian Smith.

    TAB says to win...

    India 2.00
    Oz 4.00
    SA 4.50
    NZ 8.50
    Pak 19.00

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • DonsteppaD Offline
    DonsteppaD Offline
    Donsteppa
    wrote on last edited by
    #157

    I'm increasingly thinking that this should be the last Black Caps stint for Boult, unless he re-signs a central contract and fully commits again.

    Other bowlers who are committed full time to the Black Caps can probably average 38 with the ball too.

    MN5M 1 Reply Last reply
    4
  • MN5M Online
    MN5M Online
    MN5
    replied to Donsteppa on last edited by
    #158

    @Donsteppa said in CWC - Black Caps v Pakistan:

    I'm increasingly thinking that this should be the last Black Caps stint for Boult, unless he re-signs a central contract and fully commits again.

    Other bowlers who are committed full time to the Black Caps can probably average 38 with the ball too.

    Yeah he has been a very good Black Cap but could be time to move on.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • DonsteppaD Offline
    DonsteppaD Offline
    Donsteppa
    wrote on last edited by
    #159

    In an ideal world I'd love Boult to play for 3-4 more years for the Black Caps, especially with some of the stats in mind like the Southee/Boult partnership ones.

    But for guys to contract in and out, picking Boult needs to be clearly better than having, say, Jamieson there from the start instead (or whoever).

    MN5M 1 Reply Last reply
    4
  • MN5M Online
    MN5M Online
    MN5
    replied to Donsteppa on last edited by MN5
    #160

    @Donsteppa said in CWC - Black Caps v Pakistan:

    In an ideal world I'd love Boult to play for 3-4 more years for the Black Caps, especially with some of the stats in mind like the Southee/Boult partnership ones.

    But for guys to contract in and out, picking Boult needs to be clearly better than having, say, Jamieson there from the start instead (or whoever).

    Yeah and thinking from a test perspective ( as I always do cos ODI has rapidly become the equivalent of 7s to 15s for me ) the pace attack of Boult, Southee and Wagner are rapidly ageing. Jamieson being fully fit and firing is more important than ever.

    Matt Henry has some time too and is a much better bowler than an average of 37 would suggest.

    Jimmy Anderson is definitely the exception, not the norm.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • RapidoR Offline
    RapidoR Offline
    Rapido
    wrote on last edited by Rapido
    #161

    Man. ODI cricket. Watching your team bowl these days is like watching your rugby team try to defend 5m lineout mauls for 3 and a half hours.

    1 Reply Last reply
    6
  • canefanC Online
    canefanC Online
    canefan
    replied to Chris B. on last edited by
    #162

    @Chris-B said in CWC - Black Caps v Pakistan:

    @MN5 said in CWC - Black Caps v Pakistan:

    The Black Caps are far too limited in their bowling attack to go deep into this comp. There I said it…..which is a shame cos the batting is strong as fuck.

    Yeah - unlikely to be good enough and an obvious step down from India and Oz.

    I've got no idea which three seamers we should play. But, playing Ish is not the answer.

    I guess if you bat first and post a big enough score there's a chance anyone will fall over against you.

    We serve up far too many pies, it's tough to generate pressure

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • L Offline
    L Offline
    LABCAT
    replied to KiwiMurph on last edited by
    #163

    @KiwiMurph said in CWC - Black Caps v Pakistan:

    @SBW1 said in CWC - Black Caps v Pakistan:

    Are we still in the World Cup after this game?

    Due to net run rate yes - but it's academic really - there's 3 gun sides and then the 4th side will be making up the numbers in the semi whoever it is

    At the last world cup we were in the exact same position and ended up almost winning it. Let's hope we can smash Sri Lanka and then it all comes down to two games.

    I think we can any team on our day if it clicks but our bowling performances in the last three games are probably a bit concerning.

    1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT Crusader
    replied to Chris B. on last edited by
    #164

    @Chris-B it goes without saying but even if you score well you still have to bowl well. The old days of big score in the first innings and so called scoreboard pressure are long gone with the way batting has evolved and pitches are prepared.

    Also the Blackcap bowlers aren’t in sync. There doesn’t appear to be bowling to a strategy from both ends.

    Chris B.C 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.
    replied to ACT Crusader on last edited by
    #165

    @ACT-Crusader I think scoreboard pressure is still definitely a thing, though.

    It's basically a maths game - an above par score and then bowl well - you increase the proportion of good balls that have to be hit and hence increase risk - hopefully you get the necessary mistake sooner rather than later.

    India just "routed" SA. Haven't seen it, but scorecard suggests this formula. Helps to have good spinners of course.

    Have to admit - I was pretty startled that we picked only two seamers and a spin attack. Especially two left armers and a leggie - and only Philipps to take it away from the left handers - and certainly neither him nor Santner turn the ball a lot.

    Hopefully we don't see that again and if, by some slim chance, we play SA again there better be massive DL reasons if we win the toss and field!

    ACT CrusaderA 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • CyclopsC Offline
    CyclopsC Offline
    Cyclops
    wrote on last edited by Cyclops
    #166

    I think the change is what scoreboard pressure means. It used to be a required rate of 6 was considered massively tough. I think that threshold is now 12 maybe even 14. Anything less than that and teams know from T20 how to structure an innings and how quickly you can catch up with a big over or two.

    1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT Crusader
    replied to Chris B. on last edited by
    #167

    @Chris-B I watched that Proteas v India match and I think the conditions plus a combination of inspiration from the birthday boy had more to do with things.

    The wicket deteriorated and the ball was hardly coming on to the bat in that second innings.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1

CWC - Black Caps v Pakistan
Sports Talk
cricket
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.