• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

RWC Final: All Blacks v Springboks

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Rugby Matches
allblacksspringboks
2.8k Posts 123 Posters 380.6k Views
RWC Final: All Blacks v Springboks
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugby
    wrote on last edited by taniwharugby
    #53

    I think we have met in RWC's;
    1995 - SA win
    1999 - 3rd/4th play off, SA win
    2003 - 1/4 NZ win
    2015 - semi NZ win

    2 each, but SA won the big game and aside from the 2003 match, the rest have been a few points in it.

    So the pattern emerging, they won the final, then won the 3rd spot, then lose a 1/4, lose a semi, means a final is to be lost next...

    nzzpN 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • BovidaeB Offline
    BovidaeB Offline
    Bovidae
    replied to canefan on last edited by
    #54

    @canefan said in RWC Final: All Blacks v Springboks:

    I agree, Barnes won't stand for delaying tactics as much as Raynal. But I fear the hosts will want a French ref

    I'm picking Barnes for the final and Raynal for that other game.

    F A 2 Replies Last reply
    1
  • F Offline
    F Offline
    frugby
    replied to Chris on last edited by
    #55

    @Chris said in RWC Final: All Blacks v Springboks:

    @Steven-Harris said in RWC Final: All Blacks v Springboks:

    Mathieu Raynal i

    Would probably suit the Boks and is inclined to do something radical which is a worry.

    I would prefer Barnes he lets the game flow more.

    Props are a question Nepo can be a penalty magnet and is not the best defender.
    50/50 call for the reserves props I think.
    Williams might be handy with some go forward in the last 20 minutes.

    Stick with the young boys. They haven't let us down, and have actually been very good. They also offer something around the field, which Nepo in particular does not.

    S 1 Reply Last reply
    4
  • F Offline
    F Offline
    frugby
    wrote on last edited by
    #56

    Telea under the high ball makes me incredibly nervous, but not playing him would be an incredibly negative choice, so I think we just have to roll with the punches.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • S Offline
    S Offline
    stodders
    replied to frugby on last edited by
    #57

    @frugby SA aren’t Ireland in terms of their attacking patterns. The Boks aim to run over you, not so much around you. This style doesn’t expose Laulala as much as it would against France or Ireland

    F 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • F Offline
    F Offline
    frugby
    replied to Bovidae on last edited by
    #58

    @Bovidae said in RWC Final: All Blacks v Springboks:

    @canefan said in RWC Final: All Blacks v Springboks:

    I agree, Barnes won't stand for delaying tactics as much as Raynal. But I fear the hosts will want a French ref

    I'm picking Barnes for the final and Raynal for that other game.

    Barnes is nailed on for the final. As O'Keeffe has done two knockout games he is unlikely for 3v4, and it could be any of them.

    I'd actually like to see them dip outside of what they have already used with the Georgian boy, but we will see. Is he even still there?

    BovidaeB 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • F Offline
    F Offline
    frugby
    replied to stodders on last edited by
    #59

    @stodders said in RWC Final: All Blacks v Springboks:

    @frugby SA aren’t Ireland in terms of their attacking patterns. The Boks aim to run over you, not so much around you. This style doesn’t expose Laulala as much as it would against France or Ireland

    Laulala can tackle, that of course isn't an issue... but he is lazy at the breakdown, and has feet where his hands are.

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • F Offline
    F Offline
    frugby
    wrote on last edited by
    #60

    Few selection dilemmas, but I think the most interesting one is lock... will they got Whitelock and Retaliick, or will they stick with Barrett?

    voodooV 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • nzzpN Online
    nzzpN Online
    nzzp
    replied to taniwharugby on last edited by
    #61

    @taniwharugby said in RWC Final: All Blacks v Springboks:

    2 each, but SA won the big game and aside from the 2003 match, the rest have been a few points in it.

    2019 pool game - we won that one as well.

    taniwharugbyT 1 Reply Last reply
    4
  • G Offline
    G Offline
    george33
    wrote on last edited by
    #62

    I'd C Nepo and Ofa return with Coles also, experience needed otherwise no other changes

    F 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • F Offline
    F Offline
    frugby
    replied to george33 on last edited by
    #63

    @george33 said in RWC Final: All Blacks v Springboks:

    I'd C Nepo and Ofa return with Coles also, experience needed otherwise no other changes

    Experience isn't always needed. We have been infinitely better for the two young props. You can form arguments for Ofa, but there is no way Laulala should replace Newell.

    Colesy does come in for Samisoni though I would think.

    G 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugby
    replied to nzzp on last edited by taniwharugby
    #64

    @nzzp I thought we'd had them in the pool at some point, but 2019 got pushed aside...

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • voodooV Offline
    voodooV Offline
    voodoo
    replied to frugby on last edited by
    #65

    @frugby said in RWC Final: All Blacks v Springboks:

    Few selection dilemmas, but I think the most interesting one is lock... will they got Whitelock and Retaliick, or will they stick with Barrett?

    Whitelock to the bench I reckon

    1 Reply Last reply
    5
  • R Offline
    R Offline
    rustycruiser
    replied to tubbyj on last edited by
    #66

    @tubbyj said in RWC Final: All Blacks v Springboks:

    SA should be massive favourites.

    NZ is always the favorite against the Boks, you guys have a 69% win record since 92, and 70% in the last 10 years. Nice try, but we are the underdogs going in, we have to step up our game to hang with NZ

    DuluthD 1 Reply Last reply
    5
  • G Offline
    G Offline
    george33
    replied to frugby on last edited by
    #67

    @frugby the Irish and Argentina bench offers nothing like the Boks do that's why I feel they mite go for power and experience over youth and Christie has put the halfback situation to bed thought he added alot more speed when he come on his pass makes Roigards look slow

    canefanC 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • DuluthD Offline
    DuluthD Offline
    Duluth
    replied to rustycruiser on last edited by
    #68

    @rustycruiser said in RWC Final: All Blacks v Springboks:

    @tubbyj said in RWC Final: All Blacks v Springboks:

    SA should be massive favourites.

    NZ is always the favorite against the Boks, you guys have a 69% win record since 92, and 70% in the last 10 years. Nice try, but we are the underdogs going in, we have to step up our game to hang with NZ

    3/3 under Foster

    SA 2 wins 1 loss against Foster’s AB’s at neutral venues

    NZ 100% confirmed underdogs

    ACT CrusaderA 1 Reply Last reply
    7
  • R Offline
    R Offline
    rustycruiser
    wrote on last edited by
    #69

    5 NZ win, 4 SA win, 1 draw since 2018 with most of the current players in both teams. But I am still claiming David to your Goliath. lol

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • canefanC Online
    canefanC Online
    canefan
    replied to george33 on last edited by
    #70

    @george33 said in RWC Final: All Blacks v Springboks:

    @frugby the Irish and Argentina bench offers nothing like the Boks do that's why I feel they mite go for power and experience over youth and Christie has put the halfback situation to bed thought he added alot more speed when he come on his pass makes Roigards look slow

    Let's hope the Boks lose a back or two early, so we can see their fatties lining up in the backline

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • F Offline
    F Offline
    frugby
    wrote on last edited by
    #71

    Not really sure there is a favourite in this game. Rather, various advantages.

    I think the forecast wet weather, should it arise would favour the Boks.
    I think having played an easier quarter, and getting an extra day's recovery is a significant advantage for New Zealand
    I think Wayne Barnes reffing (if it is him) probably favours New Zealand, as he is more likely to let the game flow than a Raynal
    As a pure guess, I'd suspect there are more South African fans, which is an advantage for them

    There are things both ways, it will come down to fine margins you'd think. It won't be the coaches or the players I don't think. It is likely to be just like this morning, where it is purely a late decision either way with an interpretation of the rules. In no way is it the referee's fault, but the fact is, when a game is decided by a score, generally speaking there is going to be a 'decision' often one that is purely 50/50, and we'll either love it or hate it.

    Go the All Blacks!

    1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • BovidaeB Offline
    BovidaeB Offline
    Bovidae
    replied to frugby on last edited by
    #72

    @frugby said in RWC Final: All Blacks v Springboks:

    I'd actually like to see them dip outside of what they have already used with the Georgian boy, but we will see. Is he even still there?

    It looked like him running the water for O'Keeffe. Honestly, I don't care who refs that game as I have no interest.

    As to the AB team, I think Laulala for Newell is more likely than Tuʻungafasi for Williams if a change is made. The same starting forward pack as for Ireland.

    F 1 Reply Last reply
    2

RWC Final: All Blacks v Springboks
Rugby Matches
allblacksspringboks
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.