• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

EPL 2023/2024

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
707 Posts 28 Posters 40.7k Views
EPL 2023/2024
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • KiwiPieK Offline
    KiwiPieK Offline
    KiwiPie
    replied to Billy Tell on last edited by KiwiPie
    #130

    @Billy-Tell said in EPL 2023/2024:

    I think you mean jota.

    Thanks - edited it now.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • B Offline
    B Offline
    bayimports
    wrote on last edited by
    #131

    Tough week for Bournemouth fans. looked like we were starting to get used to the press and some players coming back and put in a woeful effort against Arsenal. To make it worse watching our Neto concede 4 and GON's Neto terrorise City made the loss even more bitter

    Finally some easier games coming up, but really need some wins otherwise will be a tough season

    KiwiPieK 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • broughieB Offline
    broughieB Offline
    broughie
    replied to KiwiPie on last edited by
    #132

    @KiwiPie said in EPL 2023/2024:

    Disappointed there is no Spurs-Liverpool content on this thread. For a neutral, the ending was hilarious as it would have been had Liverpool scored with 9 players in the 96th minute. Spurs had no clue how to break down a 9 man team, playing way too narrow with both wide players not starting wide and then cutting in on their stronger foot. Finally they get a right footer on the right to ping one into the box and Matip with the excellent finish.

    Plus they are admitting to making a mistake of the Liverpool goal that was not given. The red was harsh too.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • broughieB Offline
    broughieB Offline
    broughie
    replied to KiwiPie on last edited by
    #133

    @KiwiPie said in EPL 2023/2024:

    @dogmeat It was bizarre that they never reviewed the offside at all - a different issue to not drawing the lines correctly. That sort of decision was exactly what VAR was invented for - assistant made a call of offside as it was a very close call. So we could get rid of VAR and then just blame the assistants instead?

    A lot of enjoyable Liverpool whining about the cards. On Jones, looked a red to me - sure he made contact with the ball first but it ended up as a potential leg breaker for Bissouma. For Jota I disagree with Liverpool fans on the first yellow. They show footage of Udogie tripping over his own leg but given that players generally don't trip over their own legs, I think it was a cynical foul by Jota running behind the player so that he nudged his leg causing the loss of balance. Second was a clear yellow and dumb play by Jota having just been booked.

    Rubbish on Jone's red. No intent there at all and his foot rolled awkwardly off the ball. Totally accidental.

    A 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • A Offline
    A Offline
    African Monkey
    replied to broughie on last edited by
    #134

    @broughie I thought it was red personally. Of course there was no intent, but he caught Bissouma and that's the risk you take if you don't get the ball cleanly. It's also how legs get badly broken.

    broughieB 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • BovidaeB Offline
    BovidaeB Offline
    Bovidae
    wrote on last edited by
    #135

    That tackle was similar to Casemiro's, and he got a red and suspension.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • broughieB Offline
    broughieB Offline
    broughie
    replied to African Monkey on last edited by
    #136

    @African-Monkey I agree, but there has to be intent. He was playing the ball and what happened incidentally was not his fault. So if you head the ball and hit someone in the head on the follow through it's a red? Doesn't make sense.

    canefanC 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • canefanC Online
    canefanC Online
    canefan
    replied to broughie on last edited by
    #137

    @broughie said in EPL 2023/2024:

    @African-Monkey I agree, but there has to be intent. He was playing the ball and what happened incidentally was not his fault. So if you head the ball and hit someone in the head on the follow through it's a red? Doesn't make sense.

    Makes all sense. Intent has no bearing and has not for some time. He had no intent to injure, but he was reckless and clumsy. Just like rugby players showing poor technique, they don't mean to hurt the attacker, but they are getting YC and RCs for being clumsy and reckless

    broughieB 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • Billy TellB Offline
    Billy TellB Offline
    Billy Tell
    wrote on last edited by
    #138

    Red was fine for me. Jotas first YC was harsh but the 2nd was a stonewall yellow. Goal should have stood wasn’t offside.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • D Offline
    D Offline
    Dodge
    wrote on last edited by
    #139

    stonewall red, you can't go over the top of a ball studs up into someone's shin. That's been a red card for about 20 years. Both yellows also completely fair, you can't trip someone chasing back however accidental you make it look.

    As for the disallowed goal, it was shocking. I saw somewhere on social media that the mistake happened because the VAR official mistakenly thought the goal had been given and the cursory look was so clear cut that he said check over as it was clearly onside. It explains why the mistake was made but not why it wasn't corrected when he saw the ball being placed for a free kick.

    The concept of VAR isn't the problem, its the lack of transparency, the lack of protocol on how its used and the fact football refs are so unwilling to admit mistakes or call out their colleagues when they do

    KiwiPieK 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • broughieB Offline
    broughieB Offline
    broughie
    replied to canefan on last edited by
    #140

    @canefan Just disagree. He played the ball and it was not reckless and clumsy.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • KiwiPieK Offline
    KiwiPieK Offline
    KiwiPie
    replied to bayimports on last edited by
    #141

    @bayimports said in EPL 2023/2024:

    Tough week for Bournemouth fans. looked like we were starting to get used to the press and some players coming back and put in a woeful effort against Arsenal. To make it worse watching our Neto concede 4 and GON's Neto terrorise City made the loss even more bitter

    Finally some easier games coming up, but really need some wins otherwise will be a tough season

    That Wolves manager looks like he has a plan. Not really sure what Bournemouth are this season except looking like relegation contenders

    B 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • B Offline
    B Offline
    bayimports
    replied to KiwiPie on last edited by
    #142

    @KiwiPie Yeah GON is a good manager. I think our new owners have the best intentions and a high press looks good and works well when all on board. However half the team haven't worked out how to play it and we recruited some players who cant play it and others who are yet to still even get out of the injury ward. So to your point it looks rather confused.

    Also our draw has not been great, but regardless the Arsenal match was a step backwards. There will be high expectations against Everton though and I am sure if we don't start getting them, then people will be under pressure

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • D Offline
    D Offline
    Dodge
    wrote on last edited by Dodge
    #143

    PGMOL have released the audio from Diaz offside. As I said above, the VAR ref thought the goal had been awarded so just said check complete. Listening to the audio it’s revealing how bad the process is and how obviously liable to a fuck up.

    PGMOL release VAR audio from Spurs v Liverpool

    PGMOL release VAR audio from Spurs v Liverpool

    Process leading to incorrect offside decision against Luis Diaz not being overturned explained as well as PGMOL statement

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • KiwiPieK Offline
    KiwiPieK Offline
    KiwiPie
    wrote on last edited by
    #144

    I listened to a podcast that compared the clear wording used by the TMO in rugby in the way that the ref asks "is there any reason not to award a try?" etc and whether something similar should be introduced for football. Comms not helped by the fact that multiple footballers are usually screaming into the ears of the ref.

    D 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • KiwiPieK Offline
    KiwiPieK Offline
    KiwiPie
    replied to Dodge on last edited by
    #145

    @Dodge said in EPL 2023/2024:

    stonewall red, you can't go over the top of a ball studs up into someone's shin. That's been a red card for about 20 years. Both yellows also completely fair, you can't trip someone chasing back however accidental you make it look.

    Welcome back Dodge. Looked like a red to me, tackler responsible for wear their studs end up and he was stretching and out of control. For Jota yellow 1, amusing to see the Liverpool rabid fans (not all are rabid) saying Udogie tripped over his own leg as if that is something that athletes do without a 3rd party involved.

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • D Offline
    D Offline
    Dodge
    replied to KiwiPie on last edited by Dodge
    #146

    @KiwiPie yep, that difference was stark. But then there’s a lot more pressure to get on with the game in football circles I guess. Seemed like it was done in a hurry. Can imagine how sick the VAR guy felt when he realised what happened

    Ps thanks for the welcome back!

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • CyclopsC Offline
    CyclopsC Offline
    Cyclops
    wrote on last edited by
    #147

    That var transcript is a tough read! Seems like he realised pretty much the moment he couldn't go back anymore.

    Definitely feels like they need a clearer process like pretty much every other sport (rugby, league, cricket), where the var says 'original decision x, checking if that is correct'.

    This is fifa though. I expect their solution will be two more officials with vague responsibilities but needing a weekly game cheque.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • RapidoR Offline
    RapidoR Offline
    Rapido
    wrote on last edited by
    #148

    The Spurs grey kit on the weekend was a crime.

    Worse than ManU at The Dell in 96. As these had fades and some black. Literally playing in urban camouflage.

    canefanC Billy TellB 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • canefanC Online
    canefanC Online
    canefan
    replied to Rapido on last edited by canefan
    #149

    @Rapido said in EPL 2023/2024:

    The Spurs grey kit on the weekend was a crime.

    Worse than ManU at The Dell in 96. As these had fades and some black. Literally playing in urban camouflage.

    It's not even grey, it looks like a pink grey. Worst third strip we've had in years

    Edit: it's actually beige I think. Ugh

    alt text

    Luckily Ange ball is more attractive and interesting than the kit

    1 Reply Last reply
    0

EPL 2023/2024
Sports Talk
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.