Rank your AB RWC coaches
-
@dogmeat said in Rank your AB RWC coaches:
Entirely academic really - no one was going to get on the park until Fitzy got crocked.
Agree, but I'm sticking to my criticism.
Dominant Waikato pack?
Based on the performances against an AB-dominated Auckland team (e.g., 1992 SF and 1993 RS win). NH had a gun backline in that period though.
@Nepia Yes, Jerram.
-
@dogmeat said in Rank your AB RWC coaches:
Agree re Hart in 92
As for your comments about Mains as a selector I agree he was a better coach than selector, but I had a bit of time on my hands.
Here are the players who debuted under Mains
As you would expect it is dominated by the three leading sides of the era - Akl, Harbour, Otago. The 4th was Waikato but they didn't have as great a representation.
Canterbury started to come right at the end of his era.
I don't think there were that many out and out duds. The ones I have greyed are the ones IMO had a pretty average career but even then some extenuating factors.
Most were bench warmers. Stensness had a great third test against Lions (and replaced Little a Harbour man) Dowd G had the misfortune to sit behind Fitzy. Bachop best option at the time. Forster - like Pene one good year that justified selection. Mitchell chosen as a mid-week captain.
The real duds were Fromont, Lam, Howarth, Seymour, Turner, Cooksley.
Not that much of a Harbour Otago bias.
By contrast Hart thought he could do a Michael Jones again and picked some real stinkers / unknowns.
I take offence to some of the ones you’ve shaded.
Alama Ieremia did his job in black, trucking it up unselfishly to set up Jonah/Tana/Goldie/Cully etc. there’s been far worse midfielders than him.
Mark Cooksley did pretty well at times. Tough for him to get past Jones/Brooke.
Marc Ellis had some good moments, it’s not the All Blacks fault he took off to league.
Simon Culhane was never going to get past Merhts/Spencer on a regular basis.
Then again, I just re read this post and some of these can be classed as “extenuating factors”
I’ve just had another look and Mains clearly hated the nations fine capital, wow !
-
Who thinks NZ beat Aus if Umaga was selected at 13? McDonald was standing out of position when Spencer's pass was picked off by Mortlock. Umaga also wouldn't have let his midfield channel get dominated by the same guy throughout the match.
-
@Nepia said in Rank your AB RWC coaches:
@MN5 said in Rank your AB RWC coaches:
I’ve just had another look and Mains clearly hated the nations fine capital, wow !
Did they have any decent players in that era?
Jon Preston ? He was picked earlier obviously……
Also a bunch of guys who had all too brief careers but were more than decent like Filo Tiatia, Marty Berry, Jason O’Halloran……
…..also soon to be Scotsmen Gordon Simpson and Marty Leslie.
-
@MN5 said in Rank your AB RWC coaches:
@Nepia said in Rank your AB RWC coaches:
@MN5 said in Rank your AB RWC coaches:
I’ve just had another look and Mains clearly hated the nations fine capital, wow !
Did they have any decent players in that era?
Jon Preston ? He was picked earlier obviously……
Also a bunch of guys who had all too brief careers but were more than decent like Filo Tiatia, Marty Berry, Jason O’Halloran……
…..also soon to be Scotsmen Gordon Simpson and Marty Leslie.
So he picked Preston and selected Berry again after a 7 year gap. Tiatia and O'Halloran were probably too early in this careers. And the Scots were Scots level.
I don't think Mains hated the capital, they just didn't have that many pickable players at the time.
-
@kiwi_expat I thought that was Deans' fault?
-
@Canes4life said in Rank your AB RWC coaches:
My worst coaches in no particular order are:
Mitchell because he dropped Cullen.
Hart because he played Cullen at centre.
Foster because he’s damaged the All Black’s reputation with his shit record.Cullen was spent by 2003. People wanted him to be the same Cullen. Unfortunately he was no longer the same guy.
-
@KiwiMurph said in Rank your AB RWC coaches:
@Canes4life said in Rank your AB RWC coaches:
My worst coaches in no particular order are:
Mitchell because he dropped Cullen.
Hart because he played Cullen at centre.
Foster because he’s damaged the All Black’s reputation with his shit record.Cullen was spent by 2003. People wanted him to be the same Cullen. Unfortunately he was no longer the same guy.
That's not true at all. He was still the best fullback in the country that year even if he wasn't peak Cullen.
-
@Nepia said in Rank your AB RWC coaches:
@KiwiMurph said in Rank your AB RWC coaches:
@Canes4life said in Rank your AB RWC coaches:
My worst coaches in no particular order are:
Mitchell because he dropped Cullen.
Hart because he played Cullen at centre.
Foster because he’s damaged the All Black’s reputation with his shit record.Cullen was spent by 2003. People wanted him to be the same Cullen. Unfortunately he was no longer the same guy.
That's not true at all. He was still the best fullback in the country that year even if he wasn't peak Cullen.
He’d lost that yard of pace that meant he went from outstanding to just “good” but yeah, probably still the best.
If only Foster was his coach, he’d have picked him no matter what.
-
@Nepia said in Rank your AB RWC coaches:
@KiwiMurph said in Rank your AB RWC coaches:
@Canes4life said in Rank your AB RWC coaches:
My worst coaches in no particular order are:
Mitchell because he dropped Cullen.
Hart because he played Cullen at centre.
Foster because he’s damaged the All Black’s reputation with his shit record.Cullen was spent by 2003. People wanted him to be the same Cullen. Unfortunately he was no longer the same guy.
That's not true at all. He was still the best fullback in the country that year even if he wasn't peak Cullen.
He was better than fůcking Ben Blair and Ben Atiga.
-
Main was an interesting one. Mixed some of the best AB performances of all time with some of the worst. His constant cutting and changing didn't help. I think much of the RWC powder dry arguments come from the fact that he deliberately (or so he claims) played conservatively in 94 to hide his plans for 95. Certainly there is night and day between those teams, but also no Mehrtens, Kronfeld, Osborne, and (ready) Lomu. But I think they definitely took the pace of the game to another level and Mains has to be credited with that.
Hart gets shit for the Cullen 13 thing but tbf he was being bombarded with calls to make it happen. And it wasn't a disaster or anything, but Cullen was just a much better 15.
-
@Rancid-Schnitzel said in Rank your AB RWC coaches:
Main was an interesting one. Mixed some of the best AB performances of all time with some of the worst. His constant cutting and changing didn't help. I think much of the RWC powder dry arguments come from the fact that he deliberately (or so he claims) played conservatively in 94 to hide his plans for 95. Certainly there is night and day between those teams, but also no Mehrtens, Kronfeld, Osborne, and (ready) Lomu. But I think they definitely took the pace of the game to another level and Mains has to be credited with that.
Hart gets shit for the Cullen 13 thing but tbf he was being bombarded with calls to make it happen. And it wasn't a disaster or anything, but Cullen was just a much better 15.
Imagine if the fern was around in 99 ( actually for all I know it was in a simpler form…..)
The amount of posts with this backline suggestion…..
15 Cullen
14 Wilson
13 Umaga
12 Ieremia
11 Lomu…..would have crashed the system !
-
@MN5 said in Rank your AB RWC coaches:
@Rancid-Schnitzel said in Rank your AB RWC coaches:
Main was an interesting one. Mixed some of the best AB performances of all time with some of the worst. His constant cutting and changing didn't help. I think much of the RWC powder dry arguments come from the fact that he deliberately (or so he claims) played conservatively in 94 to hide his plans for 95. Certainly there is night and day between those teams, but also no Mehrtens, Kronfeld, Osborne, and (ready) Lomu. But I think they definitely took the pace of the game to another level and Mains has to be credited with that.
Hart gets shit for the Cullen 13 thing but tbf he was being bombarded with calls to make it happen. And it wasn't a disaster or anything, but Cullen was just a much better 15.
Imagine if the fern was around in 99 ( actually for all I know it was in a simpler form…..)
The amount of posts with this backline suggestion…..
15 Cullen
14 Wilson
13 Umaga
12 Ieremia
11 Lomu…..would have crashed the system !
Especially as it would have been dial up...
-
@canefan said in Rank your AB RWC coaches:
@MN5 said in Rank your AB RWC coaches:
@Rancid-Schnitzel said in Rank your AB RWC coaches:
Main was an interesting one. Mixed some of the best AB performances of all time with some of the worst. His constant cutting and changing didn't help. I think much of the RWC powder dry arguments come from the fact that he deliberately (or so he claims) played conservatively in 94 to hide his plans for 95. Certainly there is night and day between those teams, but also no Mehrtens, Kronfeld, Osborne, and (ready) Lomu. But I think they definitely took the pace of the game to another level and Mains has to be credited with that.
Hart gets shit for the Cullen 13 thing but tbf he was being bombarded with calls to make it happen. And it wasn't a disaster or anything, but Cullen was just a much better 15.
Imagine if the fern was around in 99 ( actually for all I know it was in a simpler form…..)
The amount of posts with this backline suggestion…..
15 Cullen
14 Wilson
13 Umaga
12 Ieremia
11 Lomu…..would have crashed the system !
Especially as it would have been dial up...
-
@MN5 said in Rank your AB RWC coaches:
The amount of posts with this backline suggestion…..
15 Cullen
14 Wilson
13 Umaga
12 Ieremia
11 Lomu…..would have crashed the system !
Bunce called for
Cullen
Wilson
Osborne
Umaga
Lomueven before Ossie carved up the Jocks. Said Osbourne had the skill set to be a great 13. Hart of course knew better
-
@MN5 said in Rank your AB RWC coaches:
Imagine if the fern was around in 99 ( actually for all I know it was in a simpler form…..)
Pretty sure that was the first year. Bart was running a NZ rugby site on the rivals board
Here's a screenshot from April 2000. The oldest I could find on archive.org
-
@taniwharugby Yeah the front page used to have 'since 1999' on it