• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

All Blacks 2023

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
allblacks
3.7k Posts 112 Posters 818.4k Views
All Blacks 2023
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • A Away
    A Away
    akan004
    wrote on last edited by akan004
    #2913

    Interesting to hear Ryan say that if we had a full deck we would be able to compete. So he's admitting that the backups are shit. That sure doesn't fill me with confidence, perhaps they should have picked a better squad.

    F antipodeanA A 3 Replies Last reply
    13
  • A Offline
    A Offline
    African Monkey
    replied to Steve on last edited by
    #2914

    @Steve Sad thing is, is he's actually played 23 tests.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • M Offline
    M Offline
    Machpants
    wrote on last edited by
    #2915

    Ball in play 23 minutes 🤮

    canefanC 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • canefanC Offline
    canefanC Offline
    canefan
    replied to Machpants on last edited by
    #2916

    @Machpants said in All Blacks 2023:

    Ball in play 23 minutes 🤮

    That is fucken bullshit

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • KiwiwombleK Offline
    KiwiwombleK Offline
    Kiwiwomble
    wrote on last edited by
    #2917

    question, did people feel the game was more stunted then other games?

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • F Online
    F Online
    frugby
    replied to akan004 on last edited by
    #2918

    @akan004 said in All Blacks 2023:

    Interesting to hear Ryan say that if we had a full deck we would be able to compete. So he's admitting that the backups are shit. That sure doesn't fill me with confidence, perhaps they should have picked a better squad.

    Who realistically could they have picked though? Blackadder wasn't an option due to his injuries, and then the rest, are they actually any better than what we have over there?

    Tuipulotu, Finau, Ioane etc. are still a major dropdown from what they're replacing (based off of the evidence at hand).

    IMO we have a real lack of depth from 1-13 (Barring 2 and excluding 11).

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • WairauW Offline
    WairauW Offline
    Wairau
    replied to Frank on last edited by Wairau
    #2919

    @Frank said in All Blacks 2023:

    Ah the philosopher king of World Rugby who got bungled out of the World Cup by a better coached England.
    that's some mediocre philosphy TBH

    look at it another way-h is good, but some of his success was built on a great core of players from Henry's era, and after he lost them, it was a steady decline in quality through to 2019. Some of the posters on this website could have done just as well.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • antipodeanA Offline
    antipodeanA Offline
    antipodean
    replied to akan004 on last edited by
    #2920

    @akan004 said in All Blacks 2023:

    Interesting to hear Ryan say that if we had a full deck we would be able to compete. So he's admitting that the backups are shit. That sure doesn't fill me with confidence, perhaps they should have picked a better squad.

    An admission that you can't make every player world class?

    taniwharugbyT 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugby
    replied to antipodean on last edited by
    #2921

    @antipodean it was a bit of a gamble to throw Vaai in at 6, gamble didnt pay out, from a couch coach perspective there have been doubts over Vaai's game at lock, and then to throw him into an unfamiliar position against world class opposition, was really only likely to be one outcome, not that he was solely to blame.

    BovidaeB 1 Reply Last reply
    6
  • KiwiwombleK Offline
    KiwiwombleK Offline
    Kiwiwomble
    wrote on last edited by
    #2922

    we have some injuries....but it doesnt seem like a crazy amount, not 2-3 in the same position like 2011....it feels like we should still be operating in the realm of things that should / could haven't been planned for

    canefanC 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • BovidaeB Offline
    BovidaeB Offline
    Bovidae
    replied to taniwharugby on last edited by
    #2923

    @taniwharugby

    You can argue that it was going to be a gamble playing Papalii at 6 too. It would have been interesting to see how that went, but we'll never know now. Foster and Ryan had 24 h to decide who would replace Cane, so I am assuming they discussed all options.

    F taniwharugbyT 2 Replies Last reply
    1
  • F Online
    F Online
    frugby
    replied to Bovidae on last edited by
    #2924

    @Bovidae said in All Blacks 2023:

    @taniwharugby

    You can argue that it was going to be a gamble playing Papalii at 6 too. It would have been interesting to see how that went, but we'll never know now. Foster and Ryan had 24 h to decide who would replace Cane, so I am assuming they discussed all options.

    What confuses me, is if they really felt Papalii/Vaa'i are better options at 6 then Jacobson, why not give them a run there in the starting side v the Boks... and then the reverse argument, what was it they saw in 35 minutes from Jacobson, made them think he was really that poor an option.

    The selections with Jacobson have been odd, it's like they don't rate him, yet chose to pick him, despite having more faith in the likes of Akira Ioane. Not sure if they are trying to send a message or what, but it is all very odd for me. Jacobson isn't an eye-catching player, but he is a tough bastard who will do the hard yards. I don't know what evidence they saw that Vaa'i was their man to run 6.

    Dan54D kiwiinmelbK Chris B.C 3 Replies Last reply
    4
  • taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugby
    replied to Bovidae on last edited by
    #2925

    @Bovidae agree, gamble either way, but then they gambled when they selected the locks and loosies they did, so far the house is winning!

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • gt12G Offline
    gt12G Offline
    gt12
    wrote on last edited by
    #2926

    At the end of the day, the Super sides have better balanced loosie trios than the ABs.

    We'd likely be better off with any of the below:

    Finau (6), Cane (7), Jacobson (8)
    Lio WIllie (6), Blackadder (7), Grace (8)
    Ioane (6), Papalii (7), Sotutu (8)
    Frizell (6), Harmon (7), MMT (8)
    Flanders (6), Savea (7), Iose (8)

    With Cane and Savea both playing, we are basically fucked. Given that Cane is the captain, the only way to really achieve balance is if they picked Savea off the bench, or Frizell plays every game like he did in the opening against SA.

    NepiaN 1 Reply Last reply
    4
  • Dan54D Offline
    Dan54D Offline
    Dan54
    replied to frugby on last edited by
    #2927

    @frugby said in All Blacks 2023:

    @Bovidae said in All Blacks 2023:

    @taniwharugby

    You can argue that it was going to be a gamble playing Papalii at 6 too. It would have been interesting to see how that went, but we'll never know now. Foster and Ryan had 24 h to decide who would replace Cane, so I am assuming they discussed all options.

    What confuses me, is if they really felt Papalii/Vaa'i are better options at 6 then Jacobson, why not give them a run there in the starting side v the Boks... and then the reverse argument, what was it they saw in 35 minutes from Jacobson, made them think he was really that poor an option.

    The selections with Jacobson have been odd, it's like they don't rate him, yet chose to pick him, despite having more faith in the likes of Akira Ioane. Not sure if they are trying to send a message or what, but it is all very odd for me. Jacobson isn't an eye-catching player, but he is a tough bastard who will do the hard yards. I don't know what evidence they saw that Vaa'i was their man to run 6.

    I reckon Jacobson was picked because he can play all loosie positions etc.
    Maybe not enough to start, I strongly suspect if BBBR was properly fit on weekend, Scooter would of been 6 and BBBR and Sam W the locks.
    Mind you I just guessing how I think Ryan would of been thinking.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • kiwiinmelbK Offline
    kiwiinmelbK Offline
    kiwiinmelb
    replied to frugby on last edited by
    #2928

    @frugby said in All Blacks 2023:

    @Bovidae said in All Blacks 2023:

    @taniwharugby

    You can argue that it was going to be a gamble playing Papalii at 6 too. It would have been interesting to see how that went, but we'll never know now. Foster and Ryan had 24 h to decide who would replace Cane, so I am assuming they discussed all options.

    What confuses me, is if they really felt Papalii/Vaa'i are better options at 6 then Jacobson, why not give them a run there in the starting side v the Boks... and then the reverse argument, what was it they saw in 35 minutes from Jacobson, made them think he was really that poor an option.

    The selections with Jacobson have been odd, it's like they don't rate him, yet chose to pick him, despite having more faith in the likes of Akira Ioane. Not sure if they are trying to send a message or what, but it is all very odd for me. Jacobson isn't an eye-catching player, but he is a tough bastard who will do the hard yards. I don't know what evidence they saw that Vaa'i was their man to run 6.

    im guessing and I might be wrong , Blackadder was the player they( Ryan) wanted , and he would have been selected ahead of Jacobsen if he was available .

    Just a Hunch .

    F NepiaN 2 Replies Last reply
    1
  • NepiaN Offline
    NepiaN Offline
    Nepia
    replied to gt12 on last edited by
    #2929

    @gt12 said in All Blacks 2023:

    Flanders (6), Savea (7), Iose (8)

    Except that's not the Canes trio, Savea is an 8. I think he played once at 7 this year for the Canes, in the losing semi final.

    StargazerS gt12G 2 Replies Last reply
    2
  • StargazerS Offline
    StargazerS Offline
    Stargazer
    replied to Nepia on last edited by
    #2930

    @Nepia Yep, the Canes' backrow is (was) Flanders (6), Kirifi (7) and Savea (8).

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • F Online
    F Online
    frugby
    replied to kiwiinmelb on last edited by
    #2931

    @kiwiinmelb said in All Blacks 2023:

    im guessing and I might be wrong , Blackadder was the player they( Ryan) wanted , and he would have been selected ahead of Jacobsen if he was available .

    Just a Hunch .

    I think this is correct.

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • canefanC Offline
    canefanC Offline
    canefan
    replied to Kiwiwomble on last edited by
    #2932

    @Kiwiwomble said in All Blacks 2023:

    we have some injuries....but it doesnt seem like a crazy amount, not 2-3 in the same position like 2011....it feels like we should still be operating in the realm of things that should / could haven't been planned for

    Kane adds significant steel to the pack, his omission triggered some juggling of the forwards that didn't work. JB is our number one 12 and the rock of the backline, the drop off to the rest is huge. Lomax is a big loss in the scrums and he is good with ball in hand.

    MN5M KiwiwombleK 2 Replies Last reply
    0

All Blacks 2023
Sports Talk
allblacks
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.