• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

Crusaders 2016 and 2017

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
crusaders
142 Posts 36 Posters 16.1k Views
Crusaders 2016 and 2017
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • kiwiinmelbK Offline
    kiwiinmelbK Offline
    kiwiinmelb
    wrote on last edited by
    #88

    The funny thing is , despite the disappointing finish , the Crusaders exceeded how I thought they would go this season ,<br><br>They played some good rugby along the way and made the play offs ,<br><br>I was expecting with the losses in players they would struggle more than that

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • No QuarterN Offline
    No QuarterN Offline
    No Quarter
    wrote on last edited by
    #89

    <blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="kiwiinmelb" data-cid="600462" data-time="1469530397">
    <div>
    <p>The funny thing is , despite the disappointing finish , the Crusaders exceeded how I thought they would go this season ,<br><br>
    They played some good rugby along the way and made the play offs ,<br><br>
    I was expecting with the losses in players they would struggle more than that</p>
    </div>
    </blockquote>
    <p> </p>
    <p>At the risk of being called out for "Crusader bashing"...</p>
    <p> </p>
    <p>They were certainly better then the majority of overseas opposition, which is where they picked up enough points to make the 8, but were quite comfortably the 4th best team in NZ as the results bear out. I'm not sure that is "better then I expected", probably more "a bit worse then what I expected given the strength of their pack".</p>

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4life
    wrote on last edited by
    #90

    <p>I think some of the "under-achieve" calls might be because at the end of that run where they played a bunch of overseas teams, they looked like the best team in the comp. They were brutally direct, being directed well by their halves, the big unit on the wing was a hyped threat, and Dagg was keen as fuck to be an All Black again. And then early in a derby game they looked really good (highlanders?) before being run over.</p>
    <p> </p>
    <p>I would say their position in the NZ conference was probably as expected, but their overall points haul, and playing a final was above what most would have expected at the start of Feb (before it became clear the overseas teams were fucking rubbish)</p>

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • kiwiinmelbK Offline
    kiwiinmelbK Offline
    kiwiinmelb
    wrote on last edited by
    #91

    Yeah that is probably more accurate , next year will be interesting with a blues squad in the mix that is seemingly on the improve under Tana .

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • No QuarterN Offline
    No QuarterN Offline
    No Quarter
    wrote on last edited by
    #92

    <p>These were the TAB odds in Feb:</p>
    <p> </p>
    <div>1 Chiefs $6.50</div>
    <div>2 Hurricanes $7.00</div>
    <div>3 Highlanders $7.00</div>
    <div>4 Crusaders $8.00</div>
    <div>5 Waratahs $8.50</div>
    <div>6 Brumbies $8.50</div>
    <div>7 Stormers $11.00</div>
    <div>8 Sharks $13.00</div>
    <div>9 Jaguares $13.00</div>
    <div>10 Bulls $18.00</div>
    <div>11 Blues $26.00</div>
    <div>12 Reds $41.00</div>
    <div>13 Lions $31.00</div>
    <div>14 Rebels $61.00</div>
    <div>15 Force $101.00</div>
    <div>16 Cheetahs $101.00</div>
    <div>17 Kings $151.00</div>
    <div>18 Sunwolves $501.00</div>
    <div> </div>
    <div>So yeah about as expected. Lions at $31!</div>

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • StargazerS Offline
    StargazerS Offline
    Stargazer
    wrote on last edited by
    #93

    <blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="No Quarter" data-cid="600555" data-time="1469579081">
    <div>
    <p>At the risk of being called out for "Crusader bashing"...</p>
    <p> </p>
    <p>They were certainly better then the majority of overseas opposition, which is where they picked up enough points to make the 8, but were quite comfortably the 4th best team in NZ as the results bear out. I'm not sure that is "better then I expected", <strong>probably more "a bit worse then what I expected given the strength of their pack"</strong>.</p>
    </div>
    </blockquote>
    <p> </p>
    <p>I don't agree with you, mostly because of that last phrase. It's a 15 man game and you don't win games and competitions just by having a great pack. The expectations were moderately low at the beginning of the season because the Crusaders lost all their playmakers, in addition to already having a failing backline in the previous years and the team starting with Dagg, Crotty and Fruean all out injured from the beginning of the season.</p>
    <p> </p>
    <p>I think most people were surprised they did well, and when Dagg and Crotty came back firing (and before Nadolo's suspension), they smashed the Brumbies in Canberra and suddenly some people started thinking they could go all the way. Then Nadolo got suspended and Blackadder had a brain fart by starting Havili and putting Crotty on the bench against the Highlanders, and the backline fell apart again. That was the main reason they were smashed by the Highlanders. Then the June break happened and their momentum was gone (and Blackadder didn't stop having brain farts, such as starting Macilai against the Chiefs in Fiji instead of McNicholl, who was not injured).</p>
    <p> </p>
    <p>If Robertson wants to win a Super Rugby title, a better game plan, better selections and rebuilding a good backline should be his main focus. Mo'unga has huge potential but needs experience around him. I see his situation not different to that of West at the Blues. The Blues have signed some awesome and experienced players in the backs (with Pulu, SBW in addition to Ranger and Moala). The Crusaders should do that, too. At the moment, the only big names in the backs are Crotty and Dagg. They need more (and I'm not convinced Digby Ioane should be one of them) to guide the young talent they have in Mo'unga, and whoever else they sign from NZU20s, their academy and elsewhere.</p>
    <p> </p>
    <p>Edit: with Robertson himself a forward, I hope he will get a good assistant to coach the backs. Not sure who are in the frame ...</p>

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • No QuarterN Offline
    No QuarterN Offline
    No Quarter
    wrote on last edited by
    #94

    <p>Wait, the main reason they got smashed by the Highlanders was because Havili was starting? What happened to it being a 15 man game?</p>
    <p> </p>
    <p>So in summary: Blackadder had a shit game plan and shit selections, followed by a series of brain farts.</p>
    <p> </p>
    <p>It's pretty subjective so I'm happy to agree to disagree. :)</p>

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • R Offline
    R Offline
    reprobate
    wrote on last edited by
    #95

    <p>you can play winning rugby with a great pack, a great kicking 10, and backs who can tackle. you can't play winning rugby with just a great pack.</p>

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT Crusader
    wrote on last edited by
    #96

    <p>Our midfield against the Landers got torn apart. Poor positioning and tackling. As good as Todd and Taufua are, even they couldn't cover for the missed tackles happening in that 12-13 channel. To me that was where the game was won and lost.</p>

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • pukunuiP Offline
    pukunuiP Offline
    pukunui
    wrote on last edited by
    #97

    Maybe they should sign Jarryd Hayne.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • StargazerS Offline
    StargazerS Offline
    Stargazer
    wrote on last edited by
    #98

    <blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="pukunui" data-cid="600783" data-time="1469659668">
    <div>
    <p>Maybe they should sign Jarryd Hayne.</p>
    </div>
    </blockquote>
    <p> </p>
    <p>Throwing lots of money at a man who's never played 15s? Not knowing whether he'll convert into an SBW or a Benji Marshall? Yeah right.</p>

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.
    wrote on last edited by
    #99

    <blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="Stargazer" data-cid="600784" data-time="1469659902">
    <div>
    <p>Throwing lots of money at a man who's never played 15s? Not knowing whether he'll convert into an SBW or a Benji Marshall? Yeah right.</p>
    </div>
    </blockquote>
    <p> </p>
    <p>Let's sign him on the cheap!  :)</p>

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • rotatedR Offline
    rotatedR Offline
    rotated
    wrote on last edited by
    #100

    <blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="pukunui" data-cid="600783" data-time="1469659668">
    <div>
    <p>Maybe they should sign Jarryd Hayne.</p>
    </div>
    </blockquote>
    <p> </p>
    <p>"It's always been my dream to play 1/4 of a season with the Crusaders".</p>

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurph
    wrote on last edited by
    #101

    <p>Digby Ioane to Crusaders confirmed - 2 year deal.</p>

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Canes4lifeC Offline
    Canes4lifeC Offline
    Canes4life
    wrote on last edited by
    #102

    <p>If he crosses the chalk I hope he pulls out the "Caterpillar" again.</p>
    <p> </p>
    <p>

    </p>

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • C Offline
    C Offline
    crusadersfan
    wrote on last edited by
    #103

    <p>Looks like the Crusaders are going to continue along the same lines as before, wouldn't know a good back if it bit them on the arse.</p>
    <p>I cant see an aging ex wallaby that been playing touch footy for the last 5 years is going to fix our back line.</p>
    <p> </p>
    <p>Would rather they get some young raw talent and build for the future, will not mind a couple of years building strenght if we could see some potential.</p>
    <p>Not like the last eight seasons where we got progressivly worse and they still did squat about it.</p>
    <p>Thank gods we at least have Dagg and Crotty.</p>
    <p>Mo'unga is showing plenty of promise and he is young so hopefully a long term answer, more signings like this please</p>

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Billy TellB Offline
    Billy TellB Offline
    Billy Tell
    wrote on last edited by
    #104

    <p>Underwhelmed.</p>
    <p> </p>
    <p>We had AB-ineligible and very average Volavola this season, now we have AB-ineligible and 31 year old Digby Ioane, who I think made no waves at all during his time at Stade Francais.</p>
    <p> </p>
    <p>Wing is a young man's game...</p>

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • SammyCS Offline
    SammyCS Offline
    SammyC
    wrote on last edited by
    #105

    <blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="crusadersfan" data-cid="600926" data-time="1469680067">
    <div>
    <p>Looks like the Crusaders are going to continue along the same lines as before, wouldn't know a good back if it bit them on the arse.</p>
    <p>I cant see an aging ex wallaby that been playing touch footy for the last 5 years is going to fix our back line.</p>
    <p> </p>
    <p>Would rather they get some young raw talent and build for the future, will not mind a couple of years building strenght if we could see some potential.</p>
    <p>Not like the last eight seasons where we got progressivly worse and they still did squat about it.</p>
    <p>Thank gods we at least have Dagg and Crotty.</p>
    <p>Mo'unga is showing plenty of promise and he is young so hopefully a long term answer, more signings like this please</p>
    </div>
    </blockquote>
    <p> </p>
    <p>He left the Reds after the 2013 season, so it's not 5 years.</p>
    <p> </p>
    <p>There's a bit of young talent coming through in the backs... Barrett and Goodhue both seem like good long term options. Nice to have a short term option whilst those 2 develop</p>
    <p> </p>
    <p>And he comes from Japan with a recommendation from Robbie. That's good enough for me.</p>
    <p> </p>
    <p>Will certainly be a step up from Fonotia if he ends up at 13. He was playing well there at the Reds before he left and was picked by many to be a future wallaby in that position.</p>

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • StargazerS Offline
    StargazerS Offline
    Stargazer
    wrote on last edited by
    #106

    <blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="Billy Tell" data-cid="600932" data-time="1469680659">
    <div>
    <p>Underwhelmed.</p>
    <p> </p>
    <p>We had AB-ineligible and very average Volavola this season, now we have AB-ineligible and 31 year old Digby Ioane, who I think made no waves at all during his time at Stade Francais.</p>
    <p> </p>
    <p><strong>Wing is a young man's game...</strong></p>
    </div>
    </blockquote>
    <p> </p>
    <p>Cory Jane hasn't been that bad ...</p>

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4life
    wrote on last edited by
    #107

    <p>Cory Jane is, and always has been, a far superior player to Ioane though.</p>
    <p> </p>
    <p>I was never taken with Digby to the extent some were. I saw a lot of metres run, but not many of those were forwards, there was a lot of crab stuff. Couldn't catch a high ball either. </p>
    <p> </p>
    <p>Now that he is less dynamic on his feet, he better have developed some of his other footy skills or this is going to be an underwhelming signing. </p>

    1 Reply Last reply
    0

Crusaders 2016 and 2017
Sports Talk
crusaders
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.