• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

Final: Chiefs v Crusaders

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Rugby Matches
chiefscrusaders
912 Posts 78 Posters 55.3k Views
Final: Chiefs v Crusaders
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • gt12G Offline
    gt12G Offline
    gt12
    replied to kev on last edited by
    #246

    @kev said in Final: Chiefs v Crusaders:

    Crusaders lineout work top notch.

    I think half of the ones down the back aren’t straight, but we aren’t putting a man up enough

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • Dan54D Offline
    Dan54D Offline
    Dan54
    wrote on last edited by
    #247

    A Bloody good one this game!! Proper feel of final!

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • K Offline
    K Offline
    kev
    wrote on last edited by
    #248

    Will they review ALB tackle post game or is that it?

    TordahT taniwharugbyT 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • TordahT Offline
    TordahT Offline
    Tordah
    replied to kev on last edited by
    #249

    @kev maybe he can claim some Irish heritage and say it was an absorbing tackle, should be good then

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • BonesB Offline
    BonesB Offline
    Bones
    wrote on last edited by
    #250

    What the fuck was ALB up to?

    How the fuck does Stevenson have defensive shortcomings but yeah cool Jordan is fine?

    Vaai sucks as a tight forward.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • P Offline
    P Offline
    pakman
    wrote on last edited by
    #251

    Apart from maul, Chch haven’t shown much. But with BOK there worth potentially ten points a half.

    1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugby
    replied to kev on last edited by
    #252

    @kev I assume like all YC, the citing commissioner can still review it?

    MachpantsM K 2 Replies Last reply
    2
  • O Offline
    O Offline
    Old Samurai Jack
    wrote on last edited by
    #253

    Honestly baffled why SS isn't in the ABs (properly)

    1 Reply Last reply
    4
  • P Offline
    P Offline
    pakman
    wrote on last edited by
    #254

    Stevenson try was classic Chiefs.

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • BonesB Offline
    BonesB Offline
    Bones
    wrote on last edited by
    #255

    Oh and yeah Mounga has not improved on defence.

    M 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • M Offline
    M Offline
    Mattasaurus
    replied to Bones on last edited by
    #256

    @Bones said in Final: Chiefs v Crusaders:

    Oh and yeah Mounga has not improved on defence.

    Yeah he has, markedly improved from where he was... not perfect but certainly improved

    BonesB 1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • MachpantsM Online
    MachpantsM Online
    Machpants
    replied to taniwharugby on last edited by Machpants
    #257

    @taniwharugby said in Final: Chiefs v Crusaders:

    @kev I assume like all YC, the citing commissioner can still review it?

    Hopefully they review the TMO, too. Should be punished, too.

    and despite the whinging, I think BOK had been ok

    1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • P Online
    P Online
    ploughboy
    wrote on last edited by
    #258

    im with kriwan okeefee is crooked

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurph
    wrote on last edited by
    #259

    Turinui critical of Stevenson's defence marshalling on the Mo'unga try

    MachpantsM 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • MachpantsM Online
    MachpantsM Online
    Machpants
    replied to KiwiMurph on last edited by
    #260

    @KiwiMurph said in Final: Chiefs v Crusaders:

    Turinui critical of Stevenson's defence marshalling on the Mo'unga try

    He was fooled by the dummy, but either way it was a try. He had too commit, imo

    Stockcar86S 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • gt12G Offline
    gt12G Offline
    gt12
    wrote on last edited by gt12
    #261

    For the chiefs, its simple, territory and discipline.

    Edit: especially we need to cut out the piggy-back penalties

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • CanerbryC Offline
    CanerbryC Offline
    Canerbry
    wrote on last edited by Canerbry
    #262

    Classy fern, whinging about the ref. It's not the refs fault you had 20 something penalties for the same thing.

    Crusaders playing MUCH smarter, playing in the right half of the field and being mostly pretty patient (except for Ennor coming put of the line to let "2023's Roger Randall/Bruce Reihana" Stevenson score, and strangling the Chiefs attack.

    Mo ahead of Dmac right now.

    RoninWCR 1 Reply Last reply
    4
  • RoninWCR Online
    RoninWCR Online
    RoninWC
    wrote on last edited by
    #263

    As usual, bullshit calls in favour of the southern retards!

    2 forward passes missed by a biased refereeing squad!

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Stockcar86S Offline
    Stockcar86S Offline
    Stockcar86
    replied to Machpants on last edited by
    #264

    @Machpants he was caught a bit narrow at Jordan’s break in the play before

    MachpantsM 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • P Offline
    P Offline
    pakman
    wrote on last edited by
    #265

    Serious question, are the touchies only there for the free grub?

    1 Reply Last reply
    1

Final: Chiefs v Crusaders
Rugby Matches
chiefscrusaders
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.