QF: Blues v Tahs
-
-
@nzzp said in QF: Blues v Tahs:
@Damo said in QF: Blues v Tahs:
PT for me.
same
Clearly accidental. He's never looing at the ball.
-
Lam has been very good tonight
-
-
@hydro11 said in QF: Blues v Tahs:
No PT for me. I think you have to be sure it is foul play to award it.
including SBW batting a ball out of play when he could have caught it? THe standard is the standard - for me, that should have had a closer look, it was a sneaky 'oh look I kicked the ball' for me, kinda like 'oops I wound up on the wrong side of the ruck'.
-
@antipodean said in QF: Blues v Tahs:
@nzzp said in QF: Blues v Tahs:
@Damo said in QF: Blues v Tahs:
PT for me.
same
Clearly accidental. He's never looing at the ball.
I don't think it's clearly anything. It's marginal either way.
I am reminded of what an old law professor said to me about the word "clearly".
He said that one should never use the word "clearly" in submissions because if it the point is clear the judge will know it without you saying so - and if it is not clear your saying it is clear will not make it so.
-
Lam offers more than Clarke for me.
-
@Damo said in QF: Blues v Tahs:
@antipodean said in QF: Blues v Tahs:
@nzzp said in QF: Blues v Tahs:
@Damo said in QF: Blues v Tahs:
PT for me.
same
Clearly accidental. He's never looing at the ball.
I don't think it's clearly anything. It's marginal either way.
I am reminded of what an old law professor said to me about the word "clearly".
He said that one should never use the word "clearly" in submissions because if it the point is clear the judge will know it without you saying so - and if it is not clear your saying it is clear will not make it so.
Well there isn't a judge here and it's a contentious point apparently. So I rely on the evidence that the player that inadvertently kicked the ball was at no point looking down at it. So he either had radar, or it was accidental.
