Crusaders v Moana Pasifika
-
@Yeetyaah said in Crusaders v Moana Pasifika:
@Bones said in Crusaders v Moana Pasifika:
Tavatanwai
Not to be confused with Tavatavanawai
No idea where predictive got that from. I'll stick to Timoci.
-
I see we have dispensed with foul play rules
-
-
@Jailbreak7 said in Crusaders v Moana Pasifika:
I see we have dispensed with foul play rules
You referring to the crusaders tackle earlier that was only penalised?
-
@Donsteppa said in Crusaders v Moana Pasifika:
And after all that, 17+ still squeaks in as a safe tip (conversion assuming...)
Pretty good by a severely depleted crusaders. Held their nerve in the end and were only going to get done by a miracle or two.
-
The old stager has come to the party. I think I prefer Heinz to Drummond. Felt Drummond was too hesitant whereas Heinz has been decisive.
-
-
-
@Bones said in Crusaders v Moana Pasifika:
@Frank said in Crusaders v Moana Pasifika:
Dallas McCleod looks the business.
Really struggling with your concept of comedy fella.
Just saw the highlights. Was he shit in the overall game?
-
@Frank said in Crusaders v Moana Pasifika:
@Bones said in Crusaders v Moana Pasifika:
@Frank said in Crusaders v Moana Pasifika:
Dallas McCleod looks the business.
Really struggling with your concept of comedy fella.
Just saw the highlights. Was he shit in the overall game?
Definitely improved on last season and looks at home at super level - but the calls from a wee while ago for him to be an AB after one good game were over the top.
Keeps this up he'll definitely be in contention next year, especially if he shows he can cover 13 too.
-
-
@cgrant said in Crusaders v Moana Pasifika:
I agree. Two good (not outstanding) games do not make you a contender for the ABs. Otherwise, players like Kini Naholo or Brett Cameron could be in the same bandwagon.
Canes have been asked to put Kini on ice so there's no analysis for the RWC.
Oh, wrong thread
