NZ tour of India
-
what an excellent and successful tour. just absolutely fucking reamed.
-
Is there a team that capitulates as well?
-
-
You don't always expect a win, but you don't expect a capitulation. India played well and took all their fielding chances too..but yes our response was woeful.
-
@Windows97 said in NZ tour of India:
In the first ODI when they came up with the stat that Latham had a 91% winning record as captain I knew that wasn't going to last, and bless them, they proved me right
Still it's a tough ask to win in India.
Latham was not Captain for the 20/20s he is back in NZ.
Santner Was captain.
So you cant blame him for the 20/20 captaincy. -
-
@Windows97 said in NZ tour of India:
@Chris I'm not blaming him for the 20/20's, hence why I said ODI's
Fair enough Santner was terrible as a captain.
He Bowled Bracewell one over, he took the first wkt in his first over and never bowled again.
He set shit fields not protecting the right angles.
I was not impressed by his thought process at all in defending the aggressive approach the Indians took.
He seem to panic. -
@Chris said in NZ tour of India:
@Windows97 said in NZ tour of India:
@Chris I'm not blaming him for the 20/20's, hence why I said ODI's
Fair enough Santner was terrible as a captain.
He Bowled Bracewell one over, he took the first wkt in his first over and never bowled again.
He set shit fields not protecting the right angles.
I was not impressed by his thought process at all in defending the aggressive approach the Indians took.
He seem to panic.I actually thought it was clever bowling Bracewell early and had immediate impact, even Listers first over from his first end was good. Then Santner removed Bracewell completely and bowled Lister from the other end both after one over....strange
-
@bayimports said in NZ tour of India:
@Chris said in NZ tour of India:
@Windows97 said in NZ tour of India:
@Chris I'm not blaming him for the 20/20's, hence why I said ODI's
Fair enough Santner was terrible as a captain.
He Bowled Bracewell one over, he took the first wkt in his first over and never bowled again.
He set shit fields not protecting the right angles.
I was not impressed by his thought process at all in defending the aggressive approach the Indians took.
He seem to panic.I actually thought it was clever bowling Bracewell early and had immediate impact, even Listers first over from his first end was good. Then Santner removed Bracewell completely and bowled Lister from the other end both after one over....strange
It was then it was thrown out the window .Panic set in.
-
@bayimports Why strange? India stacked their team with quick bowlers. Just one over to check for turn seemed sensible. NZ had a rather weak pace attack and India capitalised. Nice innings from Daryl Mitchell in tough circumstances though. Maybe he could have been bowled earlier given what he showed in the final over.
-
@ARHS strange because not only did he get a wicket, but conceding 8 was comparatively cheap and he was not seen again in the innings especially when compared to the expensive mess that was Tickner, Ferguson..
Ferguson was always likely to get overs regardless but not bowling Bracewell again in my mind was not the right decision.
-
@bayimports said in NZ tour of India:
@ARHS strange because not only did he get a wicket, but conceding 8 was comparatively cheap and he was not seen again in the innings especially when compared to the expensive mess that was Tickner, Ferguson..
Ferguson was always likely to get overs regardless but not bowling Bracewell again in my mind was not the right decision.
Yep totally agree
