• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

Transformer Boks v Irish Projects - Ireland's SA Tour 2016 - Series Decider

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
190 Posts 37 Posters 22.2k Views
Transformer Boks v Irish Projects - Ireland's SA Tour 2016 - Series Decider
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • boobooB Offline
    boobooB Offline
    booboo
    wrote on last edited by
    #178

    <blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="tubbyj" data-cid="592935" data-time="1467244800"><p>
    Optimistically a decade minimum pessimistically 2-3<br><br>
    Whats the alternative? No quotas and wait for open revolt, civil war and their removal from international sport altogether?<br><br>
    Mandela wisely chose to avoid this scenario after the end of Apartheid but he is gone now and frustration, race hate and violence have been simmering under the surface for a while now. Only way to stop it is to ensure all races have a investment in seeing it doesn't happen.</p></blockquote>
    <br>
    So a racial mix in the national rugby team that doesn't exactly match the proportions of the general population is the powder keg that will lead to civil war.<br><br>
    In the grand pantheon of stupid statements made on TSF I congratulate you on making the hall of fame.<br><br>
    Whoever said above that fighting racism with racism is pathetic is on the money. Integration and acceptance based on ability will fix these issues. Not more bigotry. They need to learn from Nelson and how he was making it work.<br><br>
    Anger and bitterness, whilst understandable (but inexcusable), coupled with greed and corruption, is setting their country back 30 years. <br><br>
    Hell apartheid ended in '92. 24 years ago.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • R Offline
    R Offline
    reprobate
    wrote on last edited by
    #179

    <p>depends on your definition of racism though eh... pouring money into black rugby clubs and not white ones, would that not be racism too? </p>
    <p> </p>
    <p>i agree that positive discrimination is something that needs to be done carefully, but it does need to be done - addressing long term systemic racism and lack of opportunity can only really be achieved by that means. </p>
    <p> </p>
    <p>surely someone has come up with this already, but if we're talking transformers then shouldn't it be the autoboks?</p>

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • D Offline
    D Offline
    DMX
    wrote on last edited by
    #180

    <blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="booboo" data-cid="593080" data-time="1467275476"><p>
    So a racial mix in the national rugby team that doesn't exactly match the proportions of the general population is the powder keg that will lead to civil war.<br><br>
    In the grand pantheon of stupid statements made on TSF I congratulate you on making the hall of fame.<br><br>
    Whoever said above that fighting racism with racism is pathetic is on the money. Integration and acceptance based on ability will fix these issues. Not more bigotry. They need to learn from Nelson and how he was making it work.<br><br>
    Anger and bitterness, whilst understandable (but inexcusable), coupled with greed and corruption, is setting their country back 30 years. <br><br>
    Hell apartheid ended in '92. 24 years ago.</p></blockquote>
    I don't know what the solution to South Africa's situation is in general but your comments are pretty naive if you think apartheid's after effects can be solved by the govt declaring meritocracy and time. The effects linger socially and economically, and I expect they might for another 24 years. Mandela set a great example but I would be shocked if 1% of the world' s population had the character of that man. In the big picture rugby is hardly that important but I just wish they could view it as an opportunity to do what South Africa failed miserably to do during apartheid and spread the game across races and classes.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • boobooB Offline
    boobooB Offline
    booboo
    wrote on last edited by
    #181

    <blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="DMX" data-cid="593104" data-time="1467287568"><p>
    I don't know what the solution to South Africa's situation is in general but your comments are pretty naive if you think apartheid's after effects can be solved by the govt declaring meritocracy and time. The effects linger socially and economically, and I expect they might for another 24 years. Mandela set a great example but I would be shocked if 1% of the world' s population had the character of that man. In the big picture rugby is hardly that important but I just wish they could view it as an opportunity to do what South Africa failed miserably to do during apartheid and spread the game across races and classes.</p></blockquote>
    <br>
    Well apparently rugby IS that important. It will cause a civil war remember? <br><br>
    Forgetting that those who would revolt are already in power. And that rugby is just a sport.<br><br>
    This "transformation" in rugby's case isnt affirmative action. It's power hungry crazed bigots playing politics, pandering to their electorate, and being vindictive.<br><br>
    But somehow our collective white man guilt excuses it because there was institutionalised racism a generation ago with throw away lines like "South Africa's situation is very complicated". Yes it is. This isn't the way to fix it. It's a great example of how to perpetuate the divides.<br><br>
    BTW I was wrong. Apparently Apartheid ended in 1994. So only 22 years ...

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • D Offline
    D Offline
    DMX
    wrote on last edited by
    #182

    <blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="booboo" data-cid="593132" data-time="1467317354"><p>Well apparently rugby IS that important. It will cause a civil war remember? <br>
    Forgetting that those who would revolt are already in power. And that rugby is just a sport.<br>
    This "transformation" in rugby's case isnt affirmative action. It's power hungry crazed bigots playing politics, pandering to their electorate, and being vindictive.<br>
    But somehow our collective white man guilt excuses it because there was institutionalised racism a generation ago with throw away lines like "South Africa's situation is very complicated". Yes it is. This isn't the way to fix it. It's a great example of how to perpetuate the divides.<br>
    BTW I was wrong. Apparently Apartheid ended in 1994. So only 22 years ...</p></blockquote>
    <br>
    Your getting your posters confused I did not say anything about a civil war. Plenty of people of this generation have vivid memories of apartheid , I did not live in it but I know people who did and some of the stories will turn your stomach, or at least mine. I don't like transformation targets but in perspective I think "it's very complicated " is an absolutely fair assessment.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • SammyCS Offline
    SammyCS Offline
    SammyC
    wrote on last edited by
    #183

    <p>Maybe not representative of the nation as a whole, but I've got a South African acquaintance who is a proud rugby man.</p>
    <p> </p>
    <p>He constantly puts up "inspiring" videos of schoolboy rugby on facebook, these vids show a bit of school life usually as well and are quite obviously private schools for kids of privilege. </p>
    <p> </p>
    <p>I'm yet to see a black face in any of these videos.</p>

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • R Offline
    R Offline
    reprobate
    wrote on last edited by
    #184

    <blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="booboo" data-cid="593132" data-time="1467317354">
    <div>
    <p>
    BTW I was wrong. Apparently Apartheid ended in 1994. So only 22 years ...</p>
    </div>
    </blockquote>
    <p>i think you're being sarcastic here?</p>
    <p>22 years is very much 'only' in terms of the long term disadvantages incurred by a race of people when they are totally fucked over.</p>

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • boobooB Offline
    boobooB Offline
    booboo
    wrote on last edited by
    #185

    <blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="reprobate" data-cid="593171" data-time="1467327617"><p>
    i think you're being sarcastic here?<br>
    22 years is very much 'only' in terms of the long term disadvantages incurred by a race of people when they are totally fucked over.</p></blockquote>
    <br>
    No. Not sarcastic at all. "Only 22 years" as opposed the 24 I originally posted.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • boobooB Offline
    boobooB Offline
    booboo
    wrote on last edited by
    #186

    <blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="DMX" data-cid="593140" data-time="1467320152"><p>
    Your getting your posters confused I did not say anything about a civil war. Plenty of people of this generation have vivid memories of apartheid , I did not live in it but I know people who did and some of the stories will turn your stomach, or at least mine. I don't like transformation targets but in perspective I think "it's very complicated " is an absolutely fair assessment.</p></blockquote>
    <br>
    I know it wasn't you who prophesied the civil war. It seems the apologists (i feel like BSG using that word 🙂 ) for transformation have two extremes of thought:<br>

    1. Rugby is not important. So it doesn't matter.<br>
    2. Rugby is really important. So it does matter.<br><br>
      The end of any oppressive regime is "complicated". It doesn't excuse the implementation of other oppressive measures in retribution, which is what this is part of.<br><br>
      If you and others think it is ok because of past wrongs that's your perogative. I don't think it helps mitigate any past wrongs but in fact perpetuates them.
    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • boobooB Offline
    boobooB Offline
    booboo
    wrote on last edited by
    #187

    <blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="reprobate" data-cid="593171" data-time="1467327617"><p>
    i think you're being sarcastic here?<br>
    22 years is very much 'only' in terms of the long term disadvantages incurred by a race of people when they are totally fucked over.</p></blockquote>
    My point being does being fucked over historically give you the moral high ground or the right to fuck them over back even though the guys you're fucking over now are not the same generation who fucked you over in the first place?

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • R Offline
    R Offline
    reprobate
    wrote on last edited by
    #188

    <blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="booboo" data-cid="593193" data-time="1467335811">
    <div>
    <p>My point being does being fucked over historically give you the moral high ground or the right to fuck them over back even though the guys you're fucking over now are not the same generation who fucked you over in the first place?</p>
    </div>
    </blockquote>
    <p>no of course not, it is a tricky line to walk between disadvantaging one segment of society and remedying historical disadvantage of another. giving the previously disadvantaged new artificial advantages to make up for that, is by its nature disadvantageous to everyone else - but their previous advantage was wrong etc...</p>

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • D Offline
    D Offline
    DMX
    wrote on last edited by
    #189

    <blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="booboo" data-cid="593192" data-time="1467335632">
    <div>
    <p>I know it wasn't you who prophesied the civil war. It seems the apologists (i feel like BSG using that word 🙂 ) for transformation have two extremes of thought:<br>

    1. Rugby is not important. So it doesn't matter.<br>
    2. Rugby is really important. So it does matter.<br><br>
      The end of any oppressive regime is "complicated". It doesn't excuse the implementation of other oppressive measures in retribution, which is what this is part of.<br><br>
      If you and others think it is ok because of past wrongs that's your perogative. I don't think it helps mitigate any past wrongs but in fact perpetuates them.</p>
      </div>
      </blockquote>
      <p> </p>
      <p>I don't like it but I can understand why someone might act that way given what they have experienced and grown up with and given the history of the country. </p>
    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • T Offline
    T Offline
    tubbyj
    wrote on last edited by
    #190

    <p>Booboo you seem quite an excitable fellow.</p>
    <p> </p>
    <p>I didn't say rugby is so important it will cause civil war. I was talking about quotas in South Africa. You think they are only in Rugby?</p>

    1 Reply Last reply
    0

Transformer Boks v Irish Projects - Ireland&#39;s SA Tour 2016 - Series Decider
Sports Talk
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.