T20 World Cup NZ v PAK
-
@Canes4life said in T20 World Cup NZ v PAK:
160 defs on from here. I’ll defs back our bowlers to defend that.
I admire your optimism
-
This next over needs to be a goody. Then we can break the shackles and go for it with four overs to go.
-
sheeshhhhhhh lucky as
-
-
@voodoo said in T20 World Cup NZ v PAK:
@ACT-Crusader said in T20 World Cup NZ v PAK:
@voodoo said in T20 World Cup NZ v PAK:
@No-Quarter said in T20 World Cup NZ v PAK:
Not sure what they are reviewing for, hoping he hit it I guess
I've always thought you should have to declare what you're reviewing for. If its LBW and it turns out that he hit it, then any catch isn't relevant.
Ummm, out is out!
No freebie! If you appeal for LBW, you're saying he didn't hit it. If it turns out he did, you shouldn't be out caught!
Nah. Disagree.
Team appeals for a wicket. There's no obligation to specify what for.
Plenty of times a team will appeal for LBW, with the only thing saving the batsman is a possible inside edge. If caught, both should be reviewed.
-
-
@canefan said in T20 World Cup NZ v PAK:
Pakistan starting to make the odd mistake in the field...
We are starting to find the gaps and be more aggressive too
-
@Damo said in T20 World Cup NZ v PAK:
@voodoo said in T20 World Cup NZ v PAK:
@ACT-Crusader said in T20 World Cup NZ v PAK:
@voodoo said in T20 World Cup NZ v PAK:
@No-Quarter said in T20 World Cup NZ v PAK:
Not sure what they are reviewing for, hoping he hit it I guess
I've always thought you should have to declare what you're reviewing for. If its LBW and it turns out that he hit it, then any catch isn't relevant.
Ummm, out is out!
No freebie! If you appeal for LBW, you're saying he didn't hit it. If it turns out he did, you shouldn't be out caught!
Nah. Disagree.
Team appeals for a wicket. There's no obligation to specify what for.
Plenty of times a team will appeal for LBW, with the only thing saving the batsman is a possible inside edge. If caught, both should be reviewed.
I get the rule! But I don't like a free hit. What did you appeal for? A catch or an LBW? Decide please. And if you want to review and challenge the umpires decision, you should be doubly sure!
-
@voodoo in those rare scenarios you appeal for a wicket. You don't know if they hit it and it goes plumb in front. The key thing is your team mates not giving up on the play just in case there is an edge. There is so much noise at ground you never know if it's crowd or edge or what
-
Kane has done his job. Time for Neesham to come in and go big.
-
Kane never looked comfortable after he hit the 6. Was rattled and jittery
Let's go Neesh
-
How to commentate a game with India or Pakistan playing
"Fantastic bowling there to get Williamson from <bowlers name>, one of the best bowlers in the game at the moment. No need for the superb <india/pakistan> fielding to do anything there when they bowl like that. <opposition> will need to get a few more here due to incredible battling line up from <india/pakistan>"
119-4 after 16 is probably about evens. But apparently, Pakistan are "in their element" and "well into their comfort zone" here.
After taking their first wicket in 10 overs.
