• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

Who are you watching as priority?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
allblacksblackferns
72 Posts 30 Posters 1.9k Views
Who are you watching as priority?
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT Crusader
    replied to voodoo on last edited by
    #61

    @voodoo said in Who are you watching as priority?:

    b46f9f51-31b8-46b2-96ef-5b6cde72da5f-image.jpeg

    voodooV 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • voodooV Away
    voodooV Away
    voodoo
    replied to ACT Crusader on last edited by
    #62

    @ACT-Crusader said in Who are you watching as priority?:

    @voodoo said in Who are you watching as priority?:

    b46f9f51-31b8-46b2-96ef-5b6cde72da5f-image.jpeg

    Pretty amazing huh?

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Dan54D Offline
    Dan54D Offline
    Dan54
    wrote on last edited by
    #63

    Have to say talk about 1st world problems, I will decide as I go, will watch the ABs first half and then play it by ear. I know it a cock up by someone in NZR, but really is it the end of the world?
    Wayne Smith jokes he may waych ABs whil watching the woman , but will need to hold his phone below bench so noone on tv sees him. For christ sake there has to be more important things to worry about, I know of a few who say the will be watching the cricket anyway so.........................

    MN5M 1 Reply Last reply
    4
  • ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT Crusader
    replied to kiwiinmelb on last edited by ACT Crusader
    #64

    @kiwiinmelb said in Who are you watching as priority?:

    @mariner4life said in Who are you watching as priority?:

    @antipodean said in Who are you watching as priority?:

    @kiwiinmelb said in Who are you watching as priority?:

    @Frank said in Who are you watching as priority?:

    Women's rugby sucks and no amount of marketing BS will convince me otherwise.

    Here in Australia they play a womens version of afl ,

    I find that one to be the worst of the womens football codes , the skills required to play that game seem to be more difficult for them to master .

    There's too many teams in the AFLW, which dilutes the talent and its value as a sporting spectacle. This is most noticeable when a team can't score a single goal in the entire match.

    Case in point:

    • Crows vs Giants. Giants scored a single solitary behind and were thumped 97 - 1.
    • Kangaroos vs Swans. Swans matched the Giants' scoring prowess. And got beaten by 68 points.
    • Power vs Crows. Power scored three behinds to lose by 60.

    my view is that the AFL size field is just too big for the women. They aren't quick enough, nor can they kick far enough. Make the field smaller and i think the game gets better

    There are some great female athletes playing. But not enough, and even then...

    i still fucking love Orla O'Dwyer though

    I watch richmond a bit but havent seen all the teams, but they do have a little midfielder monique conti who is a great little player ,(apparently was a good basketballer too ) , but she is almost too good for her teammates will make a great play swerving and beating defenders with her pace and then hit a teammate with a beautiful drilling kick and then they cant catch it

    She is on a different level

    She played in the WNBL for Bulleen and repped Aussie as a junior. She has terrific footwork and hand eye coordination. She’s not tall and I think she’s still playing Bball in the footy off-season but at the NBL1 level only.

    Yeah the skills are going to take some time to even up and I think the AFL are in for the long haul so it’s a matter of when and not if.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • MN5M Online
    MN5M Online
    MN5
    replied to Dan54 on last edited by
    #65
    This post is deleted!
    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • DamoD Offline
    DamoD Offline
    Damo
    wrote on last edited by
    #66

    I am going to be watching history made.

    Japan has beaten the Boks, Ireland Scotland and Wales. Their time has come.

    The team from 1995 will look on with pride.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Billy TellB Offline
    Billy TellB Offline
    Billy Tell
    wrote on last edited by
    #67

    Ive been pretty impressed by the BFs. Only area where I see a demonstrable difference is the range on the kicks, whether sideline conversions or kicking for territory. The men have more range. Some of the back line moves have been super slick.

    taniwharugbyT CrucialC 2 Replies Last reply
    4
  • taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugby
    replied to Billy Tell on last edited by
    #68

    @Billy-Tell Wayne Smith!

    Pretty gusty conditions up here right now, warm, but dry at moment (been a couple of showers through the day so far)

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • CrucialC Offline
    CrucialC Offline
    Crucial
    replied to Billy Tell on last edited by
    #69

    @Billy-Tell said in Who are you watching as priority?:

    Ive been pretty impressed by the BFs. Only area where I see a demonstrable difference is the range on the kicks, whether sideline conversions or kicking for territory. The men have more range. Some of the back line moves have been super slick.

    Range on kicks is a problem (although the games at Whangarei and Waitakere have often had a decent breeze which hasn't helped as well). The 'weakness' that actually makes for a good game at times is the width and speed of passing. Team that are smart compress a bit and stand closer but then if then can move the ball wider there is lots more room than the men's game.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • Billy TellB Offline
    Billy TellB Offline
    Billy Tell
    wrote on last edited by Billy Tell
    #70

    To be frank (ba dum tish) with the misogynists, BF are great. Super well coached and in Fitzpatrick and Fluhler they have their Nonu and Smith. The men’s XV could emulate their use of when to pick n go and when to spin it. Cocksedge took the right options but still too slow. I have no idea why Demant was relieved of the goal kicking.

    canefanC Crazy HorseC 2 Replies Last reply
    1
  • canefanC Offline
    canefanC Offline
    canefan
    replied to Billy Tell on last edited by
    #71

    @Billy-Tell said in Who are you watching as priority?:

    To be frank (ba dum tish) with the misogynists, BF are great. Super well coached and in Fitzpatrick and Fluhler they have their Nonu and Smith. The men’s XV could emulate their use of when to pick n go and when to spin it. Cocksedge took the right options but still too slow. I have no idea why Demant was relieved of the goal kicking.

    Maybe the game was over as a contest and they wanted to get Holmes some kicking reps in a real game

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Crazy HorseC Offline
    Crazy HorseC Offline
    Crazy Horse
    replied to Billy Tell on last edited by
    #72

    @Billy-Tell said in Who are you watching as priority?:

    To be frank (ba dum tish) with the misogynists, BF are great. Super well coached and in Fitzpatrick and Fluhler they have their Nonu and Smith. The men’s XV could emulate their use of when to pick n go and when to spin it. Cocksedge took the right options but still too slow. I have no idea why Demant was relieved of the goal kicking.

    So not watching or being interested in the BFs is misogynistic? Or did I misunderstand you?

    I haven't seen any comments on here that reflect that attitude. Just people expressing a preference and giving reasons why. I prefer women's Netball to men's Netball. Does that make me prejudice against men?

    1 Reply Last reply
    1

Who are you watching as priority?
Sports Talk
allblacksblackferns
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.