• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

Transformer Boks v Irish Projects - Ireland's SA Tour 2016 - Series Decider

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
190 Posts 37 Posters 22.2k Views
Transformer Boks v Irish Projects - Ireland's SA Tour 2016 - Series Decider
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • HoorooH Offline
    HoorooH Offline
    Hooroo
    wrote on last edited by
    #137

    <p>Go on Ireland!!!</p>

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • HigginsH Offline
    HigginsH Offline
    Higgins
    wrote on last edited by
    #138

    <p>I love the way Ireland name the player's club and province after their names. It gives recognition of the clubs contribution to the players development, a bit dated in NZ nowadays but there are still the odd one or two that are not on the academy conveyor belt from the time they left school like Conrad Smith and Cory Jane who came up through and played weekly for their clubs.</p>

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • TordahT Offline
    TordahT Offline
    Tordah
    wrote on last edited by
    #139

    <p>love the SA anthem - up until the Afrikaans part, that is, weird change of tone then</p>

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • TordahT Offline
    TordahT Offline
    Tordah
    wrote on last edited by
    #140

    <p>uh oh, Irish player fell ugly, Le Roux might be in trouble, YC. Probably a bit lucky not to get sent off, but it was a fair challenge. The rule is stupid whereby they dish out the sentence based on how the other player falls. He was clearly going for the ball only</p>

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • SiamS Offline
    SiamS Offline
    Siam
    wrote on last edited by
    #141

    Jacksonmakes a mockery of what we all thought the protocol was.<br><br>
    Modern refereeing consistency is farcical

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • D Offline
    D Offline
    Derm McCrum
    wrote on last edited by
    #142

    Now that was a team try of running rugby. <br><br>
    7-3 after 17 mins.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • D Offline
    D Offline
    Derm McCrum
    wrote on last edited by
    #143

    And another three from Paddy's boot.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • D Offline
    D Offline
    Derm McCrum
    wrote on last edited by
    #144

    Lovely cross kick and catch by Pietersen to cross the line. And the conversion. <br><br>
    SA 13-10 at the break.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • TordahT Offline
    TordahT Offline
    Tordah
    wrote on last edited by
    #145

    <p>that was a shocking refereeing performance by Jackson, Ireland can feel aggrieved. Judging by the June tests only, I'd have NZ as 1, AUS as 2nd and SA as 3rd for TRC. Argentina sucks, so they'll be last anyways.</p>

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • antipodeanA Online
    antipodeanA Online
    antipodean
    wrote on last edited by
    #146

    <blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="Tordah" data-cid="591846" data-time="1466873726">
    <div>
    <p>Judging by the June tests only, I'd have NZ as 1, AUS as 2nd and SA as 3rd for TRC. Argentina sucks, so they'll be last anyways.</p>
    </div>
    </blockquote>
    <p> </p>
    <p>Situation normal then.</p>
    <p> </p>
    <p>Ireland squandered a great chance to win 3-0 in the Republic.</p>

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • NepiaN Offline
    NepiaN Offline
    Nepia
    wrote on last edited by
    #147

    <blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="Tordah" data-cid="591824" data-time="1466867657">
    <div>
    <p>uh oh, Irish player fell ugly, Le Roux might be in trouble, YC. Probably a bit lucky not to get sent off, but it was a fair challenge. The rule is stupid whereby they dish out the sentence based on how the other player falls. He was clearly going for the ball only</p>
    </div>
    </blockquote>
    <p>I read about this before seeing this and was expecting the worst challenge known to man. A player shouldn't get sent off for clearly going for the ball so I don't think he was lucky.</p>

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • nzzpN Online
    nzzpN Online
    nzzp
    wrote on last edited by
    #148

    <blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="Nepia" data-cid="591940" data-time="1466904191">
    <div>
    <p>I read about this before seeing this and was expecting the worst challenge known to man. A player shouldn't get sent off for clearly going for the ball so I don't think he was lucky.</p>
    </div>
    </blockquote>
    <p> </p>
    <p>Same as tip tackles though - how someone lands is Red-Yellow-Pen.</p>
    <p> </p>
    <p>In this case le Roux (like Stander two weeks ago) didn't have a realistic chance of challenging.  Naholos one was closer.  This area of the game needs attention and cleaning up ASAP - it is getting too risky to contest kicks, which is rubbish.</p>

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • NepiaN Offline
    NepiaN Offline
    Nepia
    wrote on last edited by
    #149

    <blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="nzzp" data-cid="591941" data-time="1466904803">
    <div>
    <p>Same as tip tackles though - how someone lands is Red-Yellow-Pen.</p>
    <p> </p>
    <p>In this case le Roux (like Stander two weeks ago) didn't have a realistic chance of challenging.  Naholos one was closer.  This area of the game needs attention and cleaning up ASAP - <strong>it is getting too risky to contest kicks, which is rubbish.</strong></p>
    </div>
    </blockquote>
    <p>That's my point. Basically you just need to get higher than the other player and if anything happens you receive the penalty.</p>
    <p> </p>
    <p>Stander and Le Roux's cases aren't similar, he was trying to charge down a kick and took out the kicker, Le Roux was clearly going for the ball and I disagree he had no chance to catch it - hindsight tells us the Irish player leapt at the exact right time and spot to catch the ball but that's not always the case. A running player doesn't have the benefit of hindsight and it's their duty to contest the ball.</p>

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • SiamS Offline
    SiamS Offline
    Siam
    wrote on last edited by
    #150

    <blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="Nepia" data-cid="591942" data-time="1466905322">
    <div>
    <p>That's my point. Basically you just need to get higher than the other player and if anything happens you receive the penalty.</p>
    <p> </p>
    <p>Stander and Le Roux's cases aren't similar, he was trying to charge down a kick and took out the kicker, Le Roux was clearly going for the ball and I disagree he had no chance to catch it - hindsight tells us the Irish player leapt at the exact right time and spot to catch the ball but that's not always the case. <strong>A running player doesn't have the benefit of hindsight and it's their duty to contest the ball.</strong></p>
    </div>
    </blockquote>
    <p> </p>
    <p>But this opinion differs very much from the way these laws have been applied. It's been proven that the running player's duty is make sure the catcher doesn't land on his head, e.g. Emery, Payne, The stormer</p>
    <p> </p>
    <p>Emery did what le Roux did. The Stormer basically did what Le Roux did</p>
    <p> </p>
    <p>Naholo did what Le Roux did and we were told that if the welshman had landed more dangerously that naholo would face a higher punishment.</p>
    <p> </p>
    <p>Working on what we've been told that the landing determines your fate, well what's worse than landing on your neck and then not being able to play in the rest of the game.? Le Roux knew he dodged a bullet as did all the commentators.</p>
    <p> </p>
    <p>It's not about if the law is right or wrong, it's a bout consistent application of the law</p>
    <p> </p>
    <p>I'm fucking glad Jackson will never ref my team, he's all over the place with his rulings</p>

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • H Offline
    H Offline
    hydro11
    wrote on last edited by
    #151

    <p>I don't think Le Roux should have even been penalised, tbh. The Irish player just jumped on top of him.</p>

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • antipodeanA Online
    antipodeanA Online
    antipodean
    wrote on last edited by
    #152

    <p>That he's been cited makes it a greater mockery.</p>

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • NepiaN Offline
    NepiaN Offline
    Nepia
    wrote on last edited by
    #153

    <blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="Siam" data-cid="591953" data-time="1466908329">
    <div>
    <p><strong>But this opinion differs very much from the way these laws have been applied. </strong>It's been proven that the running player's duty is make sure the catcher doesn't land on his head, e.g. Emery, Payne, The stormer</p>
    <p> </p>
    <p>Emery did what le Roux did. The Stormer basically did what Le Roux did</p>
    <p> </p>
    <p>Naholo did what Le Roux did and we were told that if the welshman had landed more dangerously that naholo would face a higher punishment.</p>
    <p> </p>
    <p>Working on what we've been told that the landing determines your fate, well what's worse than landing on your neck and then not being able to play in the rest of the game.? Le Roux knew he dodged a bullet as did all the commentators.</p>
    <p> </p>
    <p>It's not about if the law is right or wrong, it's a bout consistent application of the law</p>
    <p> </p>
    <p>I'm fucking glad Jackson will never ref my team, he's all over the place with his rulings</p>
    </div>
    </blockquote>
    <p>I can't help it if the WR  and their refs have got their interpretation wrong. ;)</p>

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • C Offline
    C Offline
    cgrant
    wrote on last edited by
    #154

    <p>This Bok team will not challenge the AB. They have no power upfront and their backs are journeymen.</p>

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • D Offline
    D Offline
    DMX
    wrote on last edited by
    #155

    <blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="Hooroo" data-cid="587242" data-time="1465769206"><p>I'm seeing quite a few SA facebook mates that live in England think about just supporting England now the quotas are taking over.  I expect that if Ireland win the series then that will further enhance their decision.<br>
     <br>
    Gee I feel sorry for Bok supporters at the moment.</p></blockquote>
    <br>
    Not really sure how supporting England helps those SA players who continue to play their hearts out for the Boks. I hate quotas but I can only hope that they continue to spread the game in the country so that rugby can grow across all races. Not so much that the Boks will have a particular racial make up but so that a diverse fan base can speak out against the politicians.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • HoorooH Offline
    HoorooH Offline
    Hooroo
    wrote on last edited by
    #156

    <blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="DMX" data-cid="592079" data-time="1466948434">
    <div>
    <p><strong>Not really sure how supporting England helps those SA players who continue to play their hearts out for the Boks</strong>. I hate quotas but I can only hope that they continue to spread the game in the country so that rugby can grow across all races. Not so much that the Boks will have a particular racial make up but so that a diverse fan base can speak out against the politicians.</p>
    </div>
    </blockquote>
    <p>Becasue the players that are playing aren't the players that should be playing.</p>
    <p> </p>
    <p>I can totally see why they are disheartened with the boks</p>

    1 Reply Last reply
    0

Transformer Boks v Irish Projects - Ireland&#39;s SA Tour 2016 - Series Decider
Sports Talk
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.