• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

QF - North Harbour v Auckland

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Rugby Matches
northharbourauckland
219 Posts 26 Posters 6.9k Views
QF - North Harbour v Auckland
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • ChrisC Offline
    ChrisC Offline
    Chris
    replied to KiwiMurph on last edited by
    #80

    @KiwiMurph said in QF - North Harbour v Auckland:

    Hodgman getting pinged off of the field tonight

    3rd penalty

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • KiwiMurphK Online
    KiwiMurphK Online
    KiwiMurph
    wrote on last edited by
    #81

    I think you can stick a fork in Auckland.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • TimT Away
    TimT Away
    Tim
    replied to KiwiMurph on last edited by
    #82

    @KiwiMurph very harsh penalty. Collapsing the maul?

    BonesB KiwiMurphK 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • BonesB Offline
    BonesB Offline
    Bones
    replied to Tim on last edited by
    #83

    @Tim said in QF - North Harbour v Auckland:

    @KiwiMurph very harsh penalty. Collapsing the maul?

    Yeah he was quick to deem that a maul eh!

    TimT 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • TimT Away
    TimT Away
    Tim
    wrote on last edited by
    #84

    Auckland with a massive gap on the wing. Even a man down, that is their weird defensive pattern in action.

    ChrisC taniwharugbyT 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • KiwiMurphK Online
    KiwiMurphK Online
    KiwiMurph
    replied to Tim on last edited by
    #85

    @Tim said in QF - North Harbour v Auckland:

    @KiwiMurph very harsh penalty. Collapsing the maul?

    Pugh clearly collapsed.

    TimT 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • BonesB Offline
    BonesB Offline
    Bones
    wrote on last edited by
    #86

    What a year Stephenson is having.

    BovidaeB 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • TimT Away
    TimT Away
    Tim
    replied to Bones on last edited by
    #87

    @Bones super quick, and would normally just be a scrum to harbour for a collapsed maul?

    BonesB 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ChrisC Offline
    ChrisC Offline
    Chris
    replied to Tim on last edited by
    #88

    @Tim said in QF - North Harbour v Auckland:

    Auckland with a massive gap on the wing. Even a man down, that is their weird defensive pattern in action.

    Yeah RTS was defending in the centres inside Trainor weird set up.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugby
    replied to Tim on last edited by
    #89

    @Tim a number of teams defend narrow like that, Northland included, does my head in as I can't see what the point is, especially in situations like that.

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • TimT Away
    TimT Away
    Tim
    replied to KiwiMurph on last edited by
    #90

    @KiwiMurph Collapsed maul is almost unknown from a tackle situation. Teams do it deliberately and get a scrum.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • BonesB Offline
    BonesB Offline
    Bones
    replied to Tim on last edited by
    #91

    @Tim said in QF - North Harbour v Auckland:

    @Bones super quick, and would normally just be a scrum to harbour for a collapsed maul?

    I'm all for refs penalising guys on both sides for collapsing the maul. But consistency is key. You can bet there'll be a maul where the team in control collapses it but he won't penalise them.

    taniwharugbyT 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • BovidaeB Offline
    BovidaeB Offline
    Bovidae
    wrote on last edited by
    #92

    It's not very often one player takes out two players in one move.

    Hodgman is having a shocker with his discipline.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugby
    replied to Bones on last edited by
    #93

    @Bones was one earlier

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • M Offline
    M Offline
    mikey07
    wrote on last edited by
    #94

    I find it an absolute joke Auckland can have Ioane and RTS but Wellington can’t have Coles for 30-20 minutes I’m pretty sure Ioane has more game time then Coles.

    BonesB taniwharugbyT 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • BonesB Offline
    BonesB Offline
    Bones
    wrote on last edited by
    #95

    Who's Auckland 5? Cracking tackle on harbour 8 just before Gatland's try.

    DuluthD 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • DuluthD Offline
    DuluthD Offline
    Duluth
    replied to Bones on last edited by
    #96

    @Bones Dalzell

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • BonesB Offline
    BonesB Offline
    Bones
    replied to mikey07 on last edited by
    #97

    @mikey07 said in QF - North Harbour v Auckland:

    I find it an absolute joke Auckland can have Ioane and RTS but Wellington can’t have Coles for 30-20 minutes I’m pretty sure Ioane has more game time then Coles.

    Stop whining bro. Boohoo we can't have a backup hooker for our hooker who's in fantastic form.

    A M 2 Replies Last reply
    2
  • BovidaeB Offline
    BovidaeB Offline
    Bovidae
    replied to Bones on last edited by
    #98

    @Bones said in QF - North Harbour v Auckland:

    What a year Stephenson is having.

    Although he started the game like he had a few distractions (in his head).

    BonesB 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugby
    replied to mikey07 on last edited by
    #99

    @mikey07 it makes you wonder if the player and/or the RPA have a bit of say too.

    I agree, there would seem no reason for some of those unavailable to be so, but they are...

    M 1 Reply Last reply
    0

QF - North Harbour v Auckland
Rugby Matches
northharbourauckland
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.