• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

Hadlee-Chappell ODI 1.0 + 2.0 + dead rubber

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
cricket
381 Posts 29 Posters 16.3k Views
Hadlee-Chappell ODI 1.0 + 2.0 + dead rubber
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • JKJ Offline
    JKJ Offline
    JK
    replied to mariner4life on last edited by
    #180

    @mariner4life said in Hadlee-Chappell ODI 1.0:

    sunnier and hotter today

    Reeks of a bender?

    mariner4lifeM 1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4life
    replied to JK on last edited by
    #181

    @JK said in Hadlee-Chappell ODI 1.0:

    @mariner4life said in Hadlee-Chappell ODI 1.0:

    sunnier and hotter today

    Reeks of a bender?

    no chance. there are bigger fish to fry

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • DonsteppaD Offline
    DonsteppaD Offline
    Donsteppa
    wrote on last edited by Donsteppa
    #182

    Interesting in the comments on Bracewell is that;

    • None, zero, zilch of the other fringe candidates stepped up against "only" Ireland, and not many against the other minnows this northern summer. I'd argue there's some conflation of Test and ODI form buried in the sleep deprivation from watching the UK & Europe based stuff.

    • The alternatives being the likes of Philips and Nicholls... plenty of posts about who people don't want, but not many clear and obvious replacements being argued for on recent form...

    That said, given the general Black Caps selection approach I wouldn't be surprised to see either a straight swap today of Bracewell for Philips, or Allen maybe slotting in at the top of the order and others shuffling down...

    The talk around how long Kane should have bowled Boult has distracted a little bit from how the others went. Santner is a perennial pinata on TSF, but Lochie was also very underwhelming as a third seamer on Tuesday.

    Given the state of the pitch do they bring in Southee for Lochie, or perhaps decide that Southee is too like for like with Henry in ODI's now to risk it...

    JKJ 1 Reply Last reply
    4
  • JKJ Offline
    JKJ Offline
    JK
    replied to Donsteppa on last edited by JK
    #183

    @Donsteppa said in Hadlee-Chappell ODI 1.0 + 2.0:

    Given the state of the pitch do they bring in Southee for Lochie, or perhaps decide that Southee is too like for like with Henry in ODI's now to risk it...

    I would have thought this was the play

    nzzpN 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • nzzpN Offline
    nzzpN Offline
    nzzp
    replied to JK on last edited by
    #184

    @JK said in Hadlee-Chappell ODI 1.0 + 2.0:

    @Donsteppa said in Hadlee-Chappell ODI 1.0 + 2.0:

    Given the state of the pitch do they bring in Southee for Lochie, or perhaps decide that Southee is too like for like with Henry in ODI's now to risk it...

    I would have thought this was the play

    really? Southee, Boult and Henry all want the new ball. Old ball Southee is going to be pummelled by the Aussies I fear; would rather take raw pace and the inaccuracy of Ferguson than Southee.

    If you want Southee, then Henry is dropped I suspect.

    Selection's easy from here 😛

    JKJ 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • DonsteppaD Offline
    DonsteppaD Offline
    Donsteppa
    wrote on last edited by Donsteppa
    #185

    @nzzp said in Hadlee-Chappell ODI 1.0 + 2.0:

    Selection's easy from here 😛

    Indeed. 😁 I'm sure I also have a vague memory of Shane Bond taking 7 for sod all against Australia, but we still lost because in that instance we gambled on bowling out Bond and then the rest of the bowlers still couldn't do the job. While there was no Michael Bevan or Andy Bichel in sight on Tuesday, I reckon Kane was probably dammed either way with that one.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • JKJ Offline
    JKJ Offline
    JK
    replied to nzzp on last edited by
    #186

    @nzzp said in Hadlee-Chappell ODI 1.0 + 2.0:

    @JK said in Hadlee-Chappell ODI 1.0 + 2.0:

    @Donsteppa said in Hadlee-Chappell ODI 1.0 + 2.0:

    Given the state of the pitch do they bring in Southee for Lochie, or perhaps decide that Southee is too like for like with Henry in ODI's now to risk it...

    I would have thought this was the play

    really? Southee, Boult and Henry all want the new ball. Old ball Southee is going to be pummelled by the Aussies I fear; would rather take raw pace and the inaccuracy of Ferguson than Southee.

    If you want Southee, then Henry is dropped I suspect.

    Selection's easy from here 😛

    Yep

    nzzpN 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • JKJ Offline
    JKJ Offline
    JK
    wrote on last edited by JK
    #187

    Won the toss. Having a bowl and Southee in for Ferg as the only change

    Got a feeling we could be chasing a decent total

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • nzzpN Offline
    nzzpN Offline
    nzzp
    replied to JK on last edited by
    #188

    @JK said in Hadlee-Chappell ODI 1.0 + 2.0:

    @nzzp said in Hadlee-Chappell ODI 1.0 + 2.0:

    @JK said in Hadlee-Chappell ODI 1.0 + 2.0:

    @Donsteppa said in Hadlee-Chappell ODI 1.0 + 2.0:

    Given the state of the pitch do they bring in Southee for Lochie, or perhaps decide that Southee is too like for like with Henry in ODI's now to risk it...

    I would have thought this was the play

    really? Southee, Boult and Henry all want the new ball. Old ball Southee is going to be pummelled by the Aussies I fear; would rather take raw pace and the inaccuracy of Ferguson than Southee.

    If you want Southee, then Henry is dropped I suspect.

    Selection's easy from here 😛

    Yep

    haha, got that now. Good luck Timmy

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • nzzpN Offline
    nzzpN Offline
    nzzp
    wrote on last edited by
    #189

    Finch is in a massive slump.

    Well played Matt H

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • JKJ Offline
    JKJ Offline
    JK
    wrote on last edited by
    #190

    Henry gets finch straight away. You beauty

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • DonsteppaD Offline
    DonsteppaD Offline
    Donsteppa
    wrote on last edited by
    #191

    Cricket can be a cruel game for a batsman who is well out of form...

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • JKJ Offline
    JKJ Offline
    JK
    wrote on last edited by
    #192

    Warner now too. Classic

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • DonsteppaD Offline
    DonsteppaD Offline
    Donsteppa
    wrote on last edited by
    #193

    Henry the destroyer!

    It does seem like a pitch that's suited to that step just below express pace. The ball isn't quite kicking on off the pitch.

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • DonsteppaD Offline
    DonsteppaD Offline
    Donsteppa
    wrote on last edited by Donsteppa
    #194

    And now Bus Change turns up at the crease and there's 7 scored off 2...

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • DonsteppaD Offline
    DonsteppaD Offline
    Donsteppa
    wrote on last edited by
    #195

    Boult gets Bus Change LBW, but DRS is called for, and still out! Smashing into leg. 22/3 🙂

    JKJ 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • JKJ Offline
    JKJ Offline
    JK
    wrote on last edited by
    #196

    4 down now as boult gets another

    Need to keep this going and not let it slip away today

    ACT CrusaderA 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • JKJ Offline
    JKJ Offline
    JK
    replied to Donsteppa on last edited by
    #197

    @Donsteppa said in Hadlee-Chappell ODI 1.0 + 2.0:

    Boult gets Bus Change LBW, but DRS is called for, and still out! Smashing into leg. 22/3 🙂

    Next wicket was almost a replay

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT Crusader
    replied to JK on last edited by
    #198

    @JK said in Hadlee-Chappell ODI 1.0 + 2.0:

    4 down now as boult gets another

    Need to keep this going and not let it slip away today

    At 4/39, time to bring on Santner now

    JKJ B 2 Replies Last reply
    2
  • JKJ Offline
    JKJ Offline
    JK
    replied to ACT Crusader on last edited by
    #199

    @ACT-Crusader said in Hadlee-Chappell ODI 1.0 + 2.0:

    @JK said in Hadlee-Chappell ODI 1.0 + 2.0:

    4 down now as boult gets another

    Need to keep this going and not let it slip away today

    At 4/39, time to bring on Santner now

    😬

    1 Reply Last reply
    0

Hadlee-Chappell ODI 1.0 + 2.0 + dead rubber
Sports Talk
cricket
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.