• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

England to whitewash Australia

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
971 Posts 84 Posters 145.7k Views
England to whitewash Australia
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4life
    wrote on last edited by
    #629

    You drop that much ball when you repeatedly have backs running at a set defense because the forwards have failed to punch through. Or when you do generate momentum your halfback throws it behind his intended receiver. <br><br>
    It seems to me the keys to beating Australia haven't changed in 15 years through a number of coaches

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurph
    wrote on last edited by
    #630

    One of the real issues of Chieka is the lack of variety in their play - he hasn't been known for having great plan Bs. Their kicking game is woeful and it looks like they are sorely missing Beale in attack - the Foley Folau Beale combo makes it all go.<br><br>
    As has been mentioned they don't have great player options at the moment but it might help if they got their backrow balance right - McMahon a 100kg 7 playing 8 and a wide running non traditional flanker playing 7.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • H Offline
    H Offline
    hurricane
    wrote on last edited by
    #631

    A lot of people were saying they were interested in how McMahon would fare.<br><br>2 knock ons, 1 penalty, line out win, some good carries. He was not an key asset.<br><br>McCalman didn't fare much better but didn't make any mistakes.<br><br>Don't know who Australia go with for the third test in the 8 jersey.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • H Offline
    H Offline
    hurricane
    wrote on last edited by
    #632

    <blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="KiwiMurph" data-cid="589641" data-time="1466299532"><p>One of the real issues of Chieka is the lack of variety in their play - he hasn't been known for having great plan Bs. Their kicking game is woeful and it looks like they are sorely missing Beale in attack - the Foley Folau Beale combo makes it all go.<br><br>As has been mentioned they don't have great player options at the moment but it might help if they got their backrow balance right - McMahon a 100kg 7 playing 8 and a wide running non traditional flanker playing 7.</p></blockquote><br>This will be a bit of an out there idea, but no worse than McMahon playing number 8, how about Hoopah at 8? He would be fast and can tackle whoever needs tackling.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurph
    wrote on last edited by
    #633

    At least that plan would allow McMahon to play 7 which would be better than visca versca but moving forward they need to get Holloway at 8 once he's back fit, get Pocock/McMahon at 7 then have McMahon/Hooper off the bench.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • nostrildamusN Offline
    nostrildamusN Offline
    nostrildamus
    wrote on last edited by
    #634

    <blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="hurricane" data-cid="589646" data-time="1466300129">
    <div>
    <p>This will be a bit of an out there idea, but no worse than McMahon playing number 8, how about Hoopah at 8? He would be fast and can tackle whoever needs tackling.</p>
    </div>
    </blockquote>
    <p>Physically he might take a pounding and can't see Hoopah adding much at scrumtime and it is hard to throw sand in your opposite's face from 8.</p>

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurph
    wrote on last edited by
    #635

    In the short term test 3 i'd be giving Leroy Houston a crack at 8. Nothing to lose - at least he's proper 8 and used to playing v English players/style.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • rotatedR Offline
    rotatedR Offline
    rotated
    wrote on last edited by
    #636

    <blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="jegga" data-cid="589595" data-time="1466283045"><p>
    I'm not putting the boot into Cheika, have a look at page 4 and 5 of this thread and the aussie vs kiwi impressions of him. He might have been a great club/superrugby coach but he's not a great international coach.<br>
    Eales Horan etc was 15 years ago, I'm not sure I see your point there.</p></blockquote>
    <br>
    You don't see it though. The way this team is losing - the culture is different. In the sheds they look up to Cheika. He made it in the fashion industry so it's just a matter of time until the Bledisloe is home.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • NTAN Offline
    NTAN Offline
    NTA
    wrote on last edited by
    #637

    Lol. People are calling for Quade to come back because Foley isn't up to it.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • jeggaJ Offline
    jeggaJ Offline
    jegga
    wrote on last edited by
    #638

    <blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="NTA" data-cid="589667" data-time="1466305551"><p>
    Lol. People are calling for Quade to come back because Foley isn't up to it.</p></blockquote>
    <br>
    Yes please.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • S Offline
    S Offline
    Samurai Jack
    wrote on last edited by
    #639

    <p>Congratulations England. </p>
    <p>Wallabies were dumb or naive though. Easy to defend against one out runners while the defense commit nobody to the ruck. As well, Wallabies were being physically knocked back and dominated at the collision. I kept yelling, "pick and go" at the screen. They didn't listen to me...Another problem was the midfield combo lacked any creativity. Crash and bash when a bit of guile was needed. The rush defense of the Poms worked a treat because of the lack of variation in attack. Phipps' weaknesses were very evident as well.. He wasn't directing his forwards in the right directions and because he posed no threat around the ruck the Pommy forwards fanned out across the park. From what I saw sometimes there wasn't anybody defending behind the ruck but he would just keep throwing it out to where the Pommy forwards were defending. Just dumb. Coaches and the tactics need to take the brunt of the criticism.</p>

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4life
    wrote on last edited by
    #640

    <p>That Haylett-Petty looked pretty handy I thought.</p>
    <p> </p>
    <p>I would be looking at the pack, the halfback, and the leadership group before I started on the backline.</p>
    <p> </p>
    <p>Is there a dumber set of captains than Moore and most especially Hooper?</p>

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • rotatedR Offline
    rotatedR Offline
    rotated
    wrote on last edited by
    #641

    <blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="NTA" data-cid="589667" data-time="1466305551"><p>
    Lol. People are calling for Quade to come back because Foley isn't up to it.</p></blockquote>
    <br>
    I could see Quade coming back but as an assistant coach.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • NTAN Offline
    NTAN Offline
    NTA
    wrote on last edited by
    #642

    <blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="rotated" data-cid="589689" data-time="1466308751"><p>I could see Quade coming back but as an assistant coach.</p></blockquote>
    Can you teach no-look flick passes?

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • canefanC Offline
    canefanC Offline
    canefan
    wrote on last edited by
    #643

    <blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="rotated" data-cid="589689" data-time="1466308751"><p>
    I could see Quade coming back but as an assistant coach.</p></blockquote>Quade will sort out his own laptop

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • H Offline
    H Offline
    hydro11
    wrote on last edited by
    #644

    <blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="Samurai Jack" data-cid="589682" data-time="1466307636">
    <div>
    <p>Congratulations England. </p>
    <p>Wallabies were dumb or naive though. Easy to defend against one out runners while the defense commit nobody to the ruck. As well, Wallabies were being physically knocked back and dominated at the collision. I kept yelling, "pick and go" at the screen. They didn't listen to me...Another problem was the midfield combo lacked any creativity. Crash and bash when a bit of guile was needed. The rush defense of the Poms worked a treat because of the lack of variation in attack. Phipps' weaknesses were very evident as well.. He wasn't directing his forwards in the right directions and because he posed no threat around the ruck the Pommy forwards fanned out across the park. From what I saw sometimes there wasn't anybody defending behind the ruck but he would just keep throwing it out to where the Pommy forwards were defending. Just dumb. Coaches and the tactics need to take the brunt of the criticism.</p>
    </div>
    </blockquote>
    <p>Grant Fox basically said the same thing as to why Aussie lost.</p>

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • TordahT Offline
    TordahT Offline
    Tordah
    wrote on last edited by
    #645

    <blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="mariner4life" data-cid="589683" data-time="1466307736">
    <div>
    <p>I would be looking at the pack, the halfback, and the leadership group before I started on the backline.</p>
    <p> </p>
    <p>Is there a dumber set of captains than Moore and most especially Hoopah?</p>
    </div>
    </blockquote>
    <p> </p>
    <p>madness! 7-13 and they spurn easy kicks for points multiple times</p>

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • CatograndeC Offline
    CatograndeC Offline
    Catogrande
    wrote on last edited by
    #646

    <blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="nostrildamus" data-cid="589657" data-time="1466302600">
    <div>
    <p>Physically he might take a pounding and can't see Hoopah adding much at scrumtime and it is<strong> hard to throw sand in your opposite's face from 8</strong>.</p>
    </div>
    </blockquote>
    <p>When I first saw the footage of that I was spewing but then saw the side on footage and he didn't throw it in Haskell's face or at Haskell at all. He just picked up a handful of the stuff and threw it away. Sort of WTF is this stuff. Nothing in it at all.</p>

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • NepiaN Offline
    NepiaN Offline
    Nepia
    wrote on last edited by
    #647

    <blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="Tordah" data-cid="589741" data-time="1466320260">
    <div>
    <p>madness! 7-13 and they spurn easy kicks for points multiple times</p>
    </div>
    </blockquote>
    <p>Yep, that just seemed really dumb at the time, and was.</p>

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT Crusader
    wrote on last edited by
    #648

    <blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="hurricane" data-cid="589644" data-time="1466299843"><p>A lot of people were saying they were interested in how McMahon would fare.<br><br>
    2 knock ons, 1 penalty, line out win, some good carries. He was not an key asset.<br><br>
    McCalman didn't fare much better but didn't make any mistakes.<br><br>
    Don't know who Australia go with for the third test in the 8 jersey.</p></blockquote>
    <br>
    "Some good carries" - I must have missed those. He had a total of 13 metres carried for the test. Not a great output for your no8 when you consider the weight of possession.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0

England to whitewash Australia
Sports Talk
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.