All Blacks v Ireland - 2nd Test
-
@Kiwiwomble said in All Blacks v Ireland - 2nd Test:
@Crazy-Horse i think the argument is he may have seen his support was being tackled and not passed, in which case you cant "punish" ireland for playing to the whistle, you have to boil it down to first principles,
tackled without the ball ? yes.....if that tackler wasn't there is there a clear overlap and no cover? yes
But how does the ref determine that player who didn’t pass would have?
Some of this stuff is just ridiculous.
I can imagine some coach in NH dreaming up plays just to try and buy a card.
I ALWAYS start from position if wanting to see 15 on 15. But recognise deliberate cheating can thwart teams. So accept the OCCASIONAL card is justified.
My gut tells me that the TMO role has gotten far too powerful. Maybe let the three on field make the calls and only bring TMO into things on request, and in post match review for foul play!
-
@taniwharugby said in All Blacks v Ireland - 2nd Test:
wonder if Razor would be happy to work with/under Schmidt?
May be wrong, but among all the posts I've read in the last few days, there was a link which pretty much said it was the top job or nothing for Razor.
-
@number9 said in All Blacks v Ireland - 2nd Test:
Has Foster said anything about why he replaced an in form Ardie? And not replaced Dalton? In my opinion this was another one of his brain explosions. Has he been questioned? He may have been but I missed it.
He didn’t have the option. Once the substitutions were made in the order they were, the sideline officials said who had to stay off. Trouble is they got it wrong, and it was DP who had to stay off as he was subbed for AT.
The worst part of this was we should have been down to 12 for needing to go to uncontested scrums. Clearly we need to name props to cover both sides to avoid this.
-
@kev said in All Blacks v Ireland - 2nd Test:
The worst part of this was we should have been down to 12 for needed to go to uncontested scrums. Clearly we need to name props to cover both sides to avoid this.
I thought I read somewhere that teams had to nominate LH and TH injury replacements specifically - ie they can't nominate a player to cover both sides. Or am talking out of my arse again?
-
@Crazy-Horse if thats the case, then thats ridiculous, as long as they have the 2 reserves on the bench, if they can cover both sides even better as it reduces the possibility of GO scrums further.
-
@taniwharugby said in All Blacks v Ireland - 2nd Test:
@Crazy-Horse if thats the case, then thats ridiculous, as long as they have the 2 reserves on the bench, if they can cover both sides even better as it reduces the possibility of GO scrums further.
Agree. Hopefully they can't be that foolish can they?
-
@Crazy-Horse said in All Blacks v Ireland - 2nd Test:
@kev said in All Blacks v Ireland - 2nd Test:
The worst part of this was we should have been down to 12 for needed to go to uncontested scrums. Clearly we need to name props to cover both sides to avoid this.
I thought I read somewhere that teams had to nominate LH and TH injury replacements specifically - ie they can't nominate a player to cover both sides. Or am talking out of my arse again?
I think you’re right. There was some controversy in Europe when props said they couldn’t play opposite side, and ‘tactical’ oldie scrums required. So must have one of each FR to cover that.
But not sure there’s anything to stop a team volunteering a player who can play both sides.
I seem to recall Ofa being nominated as LH but subbing for TH or vice versa.
-
@antipodean said in All Blacks v Ireland - 2nd Test:
@pakman said in All Blacks v Ireland - 2nd Test:
World Rugby may ask Jaco Peyper to change his tune on several controversial decisions in Ireland’s win over All Blacks
Does the recipient have to end up with broken bones or a severe concussion for it to warrant a red card? Answer on a postcard to World Rugby
It takes some chutzpah to complain that you were dudded in the refereeing when you compare Dalton's perfectly legitimate penalty and Lowe's coat hanger.
This article is the first of many this week that will seek to put pressure on the officials to keep an eye on the ABs and their countless indiscretions.
I read somewhere that Foster said that World Rugby thought the ABs should have had 4 yellow cards in test 1. Aside from Barrett's moment of madness, I'm intrigued to know what the other 3 were. It is very much one way though. Have Ireland committed any offences that went unpunished? E.g. Lowe's coathanger. Or are NZ just a cynical team getting their comeuppance.
In the build up to 3rd test, there needs to be focus on Ireland's shepherding (legal/illegal?), offside line, decoy runners/obstruction and work at the breakdown. Because if the focus is on AB indiscretions only next week...
-
@pakman said in All Blacks v Ireland - 2nd Test:
That Barnes sure knows his Rugby. There’s nothing more inspirational than an ex English player getting on another countries bandwagon ( another country they usually hate at the best of times ) when they beat the All Blacks.
I’m shocked there wasn’t more digs at Sam Cane. He must have been working to a deadline.
-
@pakman said in All Blacks v Ireland - 2nd Test:
@Crazy-Horse said in All Blacks v Ireland - 2nd Test:
@kev said in All Blacks v Ireland - 2nd Test:
The worst part of this was we should have been down to 12 for needed to go to uncontested scrums. Clearly we need to name props to cover both sides to avoid this.
I thought I read somewhere that teams had to nominate LH and TH injury replacements specifically - ie they can't nominate a player to cover both sides. Or am talking out of my arse again?
I think you’re right. There was some controversy in Europe when props said they couldn’t play opposite side, and ‘tactical’ oldie scrums required. So must have one of each FR to cover that.
But not sure there’s anything to stop a team volunteering a player who can play both sides.
I seem to recall Ofa being nominated as LH but subbing for TH or vice versa.
This is what I found on the World Rugby website. I am still a little confused.
Prior to the match, each team must advise the appropriate match official of their front-row players and possible front-row replacements and which position(s) in the front row they can play. Only these players may play in the front row when the scrum is contested and only in their designated position(s).
A replacement front-row player may start the match in another position. -
When trying to rationalise the performance of the ABs over the weekend and since the new regime took over, simply put, wrong Head Coaching team and wrong Captain, the rest is a flow on effect from there.
-
@mariner4life said in All Blacks v Ireland - 2nd Test:
@antipodean said in All Blacks v Ireland - 2nd Test:
@TheMojoman said in All Blacks v Ireland - 2nd Test:
We’ll that was a strange game, hard to get any flow with the cards and with the Irish playing so well.
I’m going to buck the trend here and say it’s far too early to panic. This AB team thrashed this same Irish team a week ago. You don’t go from being an excellent team to a poor one in one week.
I think the scoreline last week flattered us.
Hugely. We got rolled when Ireland got ball
The fact we were down to 13-14 men for the majority of the game and the Irish only beat us by 11PTS is a lot more positive than getting blown out last week.
I think the AB’s have much more upside playing at home and with the talent we have at hand. Unless there are more reds/yellows against us I reckon AB’s will win by 10.
-
-
@Steven-Harris said in All Blacks v Ireland - 2nd Test:
This is awesome , ABs front row totally exposed ..Foster out coached not for the first time
That is brutal to watch. It used to be NZ forwards with the soft hands and running lines to carve out metres in traffic and get on the front foot.
-
@Steven-Harris said in All Blacks v Ireland - 2nd Test:
@stodders what was worse , it kept happening time ,after time after time , makes you wonder what the brains trust were watching 🤦🏻
That poster also has a video about NZ's attack structure, or lack of it. Lends itself to the theory that NZ have poor attacking patterns and are relying on individualism to break open organised defences. V poor coaching.
-
@Crazy-Horse said in All Blacks v Ireland - 2nd Test:
@pakman said in All Blacks v Ireland - 2nd Test:
@Crazy-Horse said in All Blacks v Ireland - 2nd Test:
@kev said in All Blacks v Ireland - 2nd Test:
The worst part of this was we should have been down to 12 for needed to go to uncontested scrums. Clearly we need to name props to cover both sides to avoid this.
I thought I read somewhere that teams had to nominate LH and TH injury replacements specifically - ie they can't nominate a player to cover both sides. Or am talking out of my arse again?
I think you’re right. There was some controversy in Europe when props said they couldn’t play opposite side, and ‘tactical’ oldie scrums required. So must have one of each FR to cover that.
But not sure there’s anything to stop a team volunteering a player who can play both sides.
I seem to recall Ofa being nominated as LH but subbing for TH or vice versa.
This is what I found on the World Rugby website. I am still a little confused.
Prior to the match, each team must advise the appropriate match official of their front-row players and possible front-row replacements and which position(s) in the front row they can play. Only these players may play in the front row when the scrum is contested and only in their designated position(s).
A replacement front-row player may start the match in another position.Sounds like we could have said that Bower could play LH and TH. in which case Ross on would have let normal scrums to continue.
-
@Steven-Harris said in All Blacks v Ireland - 2nd Test:
This is awesome , ABs front row totally exposed ..Foster out coached not for the first time
That's straight out Mcleod's job. Club level stuff.
