• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

All Blacks v Ireland - 1st Test

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Rugby Matches
allblacksireland
1.8k Posts 90 Posters 149.0k Views
All Blacks v Ireland - 1st Test
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • M Offline
    M Offline
    Machpants
    replied to Crucial on last edited by
    #216

    @Crucial said in All Blacks v Ireland - 1st Test:

    @ACT-Crusader said in All Blacks v Ireland - 1st Test:

    @mariner4life said in All Blacks v Ireland - 1st Test:

    @TheMojoman said in All Blacks v Ireland - 1st Test:

    What's less ideal is playing two power wingers.

    i reckon that thinking is 5 years out of date

    and i would struggle to call many of those blokes "power" wingers. The only power winger is also really good under the high ball.

    The way the ABs set up defensively we tend to drop our 1st 5 back to help with the kick reception plus to get 3 or even 4 players behind the ball to counter from. So you want strong attackers out wide, and for me it doesn’t matter whether they get over the gain line by tackle busts or beating their man by stepping or outside pace. Either creates opportunities.

    I think the whole Dagg/Mils, Dagg/Bender, Jane, Jordie etc was more about getting the best players on the field and then having the gameplan that those players with their skill sets could execute.

    Henry didn’t mind the Rok/Sivi combo from time to time either.

    Who was that Cantab that had these qualities in abundance? Recent AB? Amazing work under the high ball too.

    Dan Carter would be the last one.

    CrucialC 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • KiwiMurphK Online
    KiwiMurphK Online
    KiwiMurph
    wrote on last edited by
    #217

    More than the individuals i'm more worried about the attacking shape.

    Of course test 1 will be rusty and i'm imagining they will keep things quite simple with a limited/disrupted build up i'm just hoping to see some variety in the attacking shape. Yes some better ball carriers will help but we need to put them in positions to succeed - bodies in motion, variety etc to get the Irish defense line on the back foot a tad.

    Just biffing it out to a forward/forward pod isn't going to achieve much.

    CrucialC kiwi_expatK 2 Replies Last reply
    1
  • CrucialC Offline
    CrucialC Offline
    Crucial
    replied to Machpants on last edited by
    #218

    @Machpants said in All Blacks v Ireland - 1st Test:

    @Crucial said in All Blacks v Ireland - 1st Test:

    @ACT-Crusader said in All Blacks v Ireland - 1st Test:

    @mariner4life said in All Blacks v Ireland - 1st Test:

    @TheMojoman said in All Blacks v Ireland - 1st Test:

    What's less ideal is playing two power wingers.

    i reckon that thinking is 5 years out of date

    and i would struggle to call many of those blokes "power" wingers. The only power winger is also really good under the high ball.

    The way the ABs set up defensively we tend to drop our 1st 5 back to help with the kick reception plus to get 3 or even 4 players behind the ball to counter from. So you want strong attackers out wide, and for me it doesn’t matter whether they get over the gain line by tackle busts or beating their man by stepping or outside pace. Either creates opportunities.

    I think the whole Dagg/Mils, Dagg/Bender, Jane, Jordie etc was more about getting the best players on the field and then having the gameplan that those players with their skill sets could execute.

    Henry didn’t mind the Rok/Sivi combo from time to time either.

    Who was that Cantab that had these qualities in abundance? Recent AB? Amazing work under the high ball too.

    Dan Carter would be the last one.

    Nah. I was thinking George someone…..not Whitelock

    M ACT CrusaderA 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • CrucialC Offline
    CrucialC Offline
    Crucial
    replied to KiwiMurph on last edited by
    #219

    @KiwiMurph said in All Blacks v Ireland - 1st Test:

    More than the individuals i'm more worried about the attacking shape.

    Of course test 1 will be rusty and i'm imagining they will keep things quite simple with a limited/disrupted build up i'm just hoping to see some variety in the attacking shape. Yes some better ball carriers will help but we need to put them in positions to succeed - bodies in motion, variety etc to get the Irish defense line on the back foot a tad.

    Just biffing it out to a forward/forward pod isn't going to achieve much.

    I’m more concerned about the defence.
    The Ireland attack structure is all about forcing correct decisions. Combos and communication will be critical.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • BovidaeB Offline
    BovidaeB Offline
    Bovidae
    wrote on last edited by
    #220

    Schmidt is taking charge of the defence this week, but I am hoping he also has some input into the attack.

    With a disrupted preparation reverting to some SR combos (where sensible) seems to be the best option.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • kiwi_expatK Offline
    kiwi_expatK Offline
    kiwi_expat
    replied to KiwiMurph on last edited by kiwi_expat
    #221

    @KiwiMurph said in All Blacks v Ireland - 1st Test:

    Just biffing it out to a forward/forward pod isn't going to achieve much.

    Welcome to Fozzie ball.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • M Offline
    M Offline
    Machpants
    replied to Crucial on last edited by
    #222

    @Crucial said in All Blacks v Ireland - 1st Test:

    @Machpants said in All Blacks v Ireland - 1st Test:

    @Crucial said in All Blacks v Ireland - 1st Test:

    @ACT-Crusader said in All Blacks v Ireland - 1st Test:

    @mariner4life said in All Blacks v Ireland - 1st Test:

    @TheMojoman said in All Blacks v Ireland - 1st Test:

    What's less ideal is playing two power wingers.

    i reckon that thinking is 5 years out of date

    and i would struggle to call many of those blokes "power" wingers. The only power winger is also really good under the high ball.

    The way the ABs set up defensively we tend to drop our 1st 5 back to help with the kick reception plus to get 3 or even 4 players behind the ball to counter from. So you want strong attackers out wide, and for me it doesn’t matter whether they get over the gain line by tackle busts or beating their man by stepping or outside pace. Either creates opportunities.

    I think the whole Dagg/Mils, Dagg/Bender, Jane, Jordie etc was more about getting the best players on the field and then having the gameplan that those players with their skill sets could execute.

    Henry didn’t mind the Rok/Sivi combo from time to time either.

    Who was that Cantab that had these qualities in abundance? Recent AB? Amazing work under the high ball too.

    Dan Carter would be the last one.

    Nah. I was thinking George someone…..not Whitelock

    Nope, got nothing. George 'Brett' Cameron?

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT Crusader
    replied to Crucial on last edited by
    #223

    @Crucial said in All Blacks v Ireland - 1st Test:

    @Machpants said in All Blacks v Ireland - 1st Test:

    @Crucial said in All Blacks v Ireland - 1st Test:

    @ACT-Crusader said in All Blacks v Ireland - 1st Test:

    @mariner4life said in All Blacks v Ireland - 1st Test:

    @TheMojoman said in All Blacks v Ireland - 1st Test:

    What's less ideal is playing two power wingers.

    i reckon that thinking is 5 years out of date

    and i would struggle to call many of those blokes "power" wingers. The only power winger is also really good under the high ball.

    The way the ABs set up defensively we tend to drop our 1st 5 back to help with the kick reception plus to get 3 or even 4 players behind the ball to counter from. So you want strong attackers out wide, and for me it doesn’t matter whether they get over the gain line by tackle busts or beating their man by stepping or outside pace. Either creates opportunities.

    I think the whole Dagg/Mils, Dagg/Bender, Jane, Jordie etc was more about getting the best players on the field and then having the gameplan that those players with their skill sets could execute.

    Henry didn’t mind the Rok/Sivi combo from time to time either.

    Who was that Cantab that had these qualities in abundance? Recent AB? Amazing work under the high ball too.

    Dan Carter would be the last one.

    Nah. I was thinking George someone…..not Whitelock

    He actually did have that game back in 18-19, which probably seems like an eternity ago for young George

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • T Offline
    T Offline
    The Docter
    wrote on last edited by
    #224

    First post here on SF btw. So far not ideal preparation but hopefully the situation can galvanise us. Given the forwards at this stage are in effected, I would go with a backline of;

    1. A Smith
    2. B Barrett
    3. C Clarke
    4. Q Tupaea
    5. R Ioane
    6. S Reece
    7. J Barrett

    Bench:
    Fakatava, M’unga, Fainga’anuku

    Pretty decent and plenty of go forward

    KiwiMurphK M kiwiinmelbK 3 Replies Last reply
    7
  • KiwiMurphK Online
    KiwiMurphK Online
    KiwiMurph
    replied to The Docter on last edited by
    #225

    @The-Docter Welcome!

    T 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • T Offline
    T Offline
    The Docter
    replied to KiwiMurph on last edited by
    #226

    @KiwiMurph cheers Mate!

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • ChrisC Offline
    ChrisC Offline
    Chris
    wrote on last edited by
    #227

    I can’t wait to see Fozzies new plan to beat the rushing defense.
    Or am I going to be bitterly disappointed again by the smarts of the coaching team.

    T 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • T Offline
    T Offline
    The Docter
    replied to Chris on last edited by
    #228

    @Chris To be fair, in the end Hansen never figured it ou either. For me, aside from tactics, we need more ball runners who can challenge the line, ie more ball running forwards, at least one big midfielder who runs hard, think Nonu, and and a powerful left wing, Leister or Caleb in the team . Also, we need our 10 to also run on to the ball, rather than deep and shovel it on.

    ChrisC 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • M Offline
    M Offline
    Machpants
    replied to The Docter on last edited by
    #229

    @The-Docter said in All Blacks v Ireland - 1st Test:

    First post here on SF btw. So far not ideal preparation but hopefully the situation can galvanise us. Given the forwards at this stage are in effected, I would go with a backline of;

    1. A Smith
    2. B Barrett
    3. C Clarke
    4. Q Tupaea
    5. R Ioane
    6. S Reece
    7. J Barrett

    Bench:
    Fakatava, M’unga, Fainga’anuku

    Pretty decent and plenty of go forward

    That's what I think too.

    Sadly it's the loose forward mix, lock impact, and props that are the problem!

    antipodeanA 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • gt12G Offline
    gt12G Offline
    gt12
    wrote on last edited by
    #230

    With the build up, I'd be very tempted to give RTS the start, with Barrett and Roane either side of him, and Clarke on one wing. Relying on some Super combinations could be one way of getting around the disruptions.

    T ChrisC 2 Replies Last reply
    5
  • T Offline
    T Offline
    The Docter
    replied to gt12 on last edited by
    #231

    @gt12 I understand your logic, but I think we need to also consider experience. Quinn will have benefited from EOT last year. He also gives us more of a direct option. Unfortunately neither have a kicking game.

    This is where Jordie needs to step up and take pressure off his older brother.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • ChrisC Offline
    ChrisC Offline
    Chris
    replied to The Docter on last edited by Chris
    #232

    @The-Docter said in All Blacks v Ireland - 1st Test:

    @Chris To be fair, in the end Hansen never figured it ou either. For me, aside from tactics, we need more ball runners who can challenge the line, ie more ball running forwards, at least one big midfielder who runs hard, think Nonu, and and a powerful left wing, Leister or Caleb in the team . Also, we need our 10 to also run on to the ball, rather than deep and shovel it on.

    Yep we have discussed all those things on here for a couple of years now.
    Nothing changes with Foster except the personal from week to week in the team.
    Repeating patterns of shit coaching through lack of tactics and any idea of a game plan is consistent though.

    T 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ChrisC Offline
    ChrisC Offline
    Chris
    replied to gt12 on last edited by Chris
    #233

    @gt12 said in All Blacks v Ireland - 1st Test:

    With the build up, I'd be very tempted to give RTS the start, with Barrett and Roane either side of him, and Clarke on one wing. Relying on some Super combinations could be one way of getting around the disruptions.

    Would not be a bad idea, Consistency would be good for the first test of the year,as we have pointed out on the fern Tupaea has some defensive weakness which has been shown up this season.

    T 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • T Offline
    T Offline
    The Docter
    replied to Chris on last edited by
    #234

    @Chris gee Chris doesn’t it remind you how good Nonu and Kaino were?

    ChrisC 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ChrisC Offline
    ChrisC Offline
    Chris
    replied to The Docter on last edited by
    #235

    @The-Docter said in All Blacks v Ireland - 1st Test:

    @Chris gee Chris doesn’t it remind you how good Nonu and Kaino were?

    Or how good Henry was as a coach or Razor is now.

    T 1 Reply Last reply
    0

All Blacks v Ireland - 1st Test
Rugby Matches
allblacksireland
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.