• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

SF Blues v Brumbies

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Rugby Matches
bluesbrumbies
645 Posts 62 Posters 34.7k Views
SF Blues v Brumbies
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • barbarianB Offline
    barbarianB Offline
    barbarian
    replied to chimoaus on last edited by barbarian
    #633

    @chimoaus said in SF Blues v Brumbies:

    @Steven-Harris said in SF Blues v Brumbies:

    @chimoaus i looks pretty daming , yes there may have been other calls that could have gone either way during the game , but you know what a team has time rectify any wrong doings ..but that call could have changed everything ..will take the win as a Blues supporter , but i will say i would have had no issues if the call had gone the other way ..

    Every incorrect/marginal call has a sliding doors moment that could heavily impact the outcome. If White was carded for cynical play on the ground or the Brumbies try was disallowed it would have had an impact. The call was 50/50 and the Blues got the rub of the green. If the Brumbies had held onto the ball instead of going for the drop goal they may have got a penalty and won.

    Sport will always have these moments and good teams take it out of the hand of the ref and focus on their roles and what they can do next.

    This post should be pinned in every match thread, and I agree with it wholeheartedly. Except for one thing: it wasn't a 50/50 call.

    It was the type of play that in minutes 1-75 it's a penalty to the defending team and nobody questions it. Isolated player on the ground, defender over the top on the ball. You can post all the screenshots you want, I don't care. You're overthinking it - it's holding the ball.

    O'Keefe was clearly aware of the game circumstances and put the whistle away. Craig Joubert blows that penalty, 100%. Wayne Barnes does too. They aren't afraid of the big call, even though it's bitten them a few times.

    But still, Blues were the better team, deserved the win, other things were missed, etc etc etc.

    KiwiMurphK ToddyT CrucialC NepiaN 4 Replies Last reply
    1
  • antipodeanA Offline
    antipodeanA Offline
    antipodean
    wrote on last edited by
    #634

    Perhaps it would've been a different matter if the Brumbies hadn't in fact turned the ball over.

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • KiwiMurphK Online
    KiwiMurphK Online
    KiwiMurph
    replied to barbarian on last edited by
    #635

    @barbarian said in SF Blues v Brumbies:

    It was the type of play that in minutes 1-75 it's a penalty to the defending team and nobody questions it. Isolated player on the ground, defender over the top on the ball. You can post all the screenshots you want, I don't care. You're overthinking it - it's holding the ball.

    I don't buy that. When the Brumbies player goes to lift the ball Romano releases the ball (albeit slowly) and Brumbies get the ball back - there's no clear moment when it's obviously 'holding'.

    barbarianB 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ToddyT Offline
    ToddyT Offline
    Toddy
    replied to barbarian on last edited by Toddy
    #636

    @barbarian said in SF Blues v Brumbies:

    @chimoaus said in SF Blues v Brumbies:

    @Steven-Harris said in SF Blues v Brumbies:

    @chimoaus i looks pretty daming , yes there may have been other calls that could have gone either way during the game , but you know what a team has time rectify any wrong doings ..but that call could have changed everything ..will take the win as a Blues supporter , but i will say i would have had no issues if the call had gone the other way ..

    Every incorrect/marginal call has a sliding doors moment that could heavily impact the outcome. If White was carded for cynical play on the ground or the Brumbies try was disallowed it would have had an impact. The call was 50/50 and the Blues got the rub of the green. If the Brumbies had held onto the ball instead of going for the drop goal they may have got a penalty and won.

    Sport will always have these moments and good teams take it out of the hand of the ref and focus on their roles and what they can do next.

    This post should be pinned in every match thread, and I agree with it wholeheartedly. Except for one thing: it wasn't a 50/50 call.

    It was the type of play that in minutes 1-75 it's a penalty to the defending team and nobody questions it. Isolated player on the ground, defender over the top on the ball. You can post all the screenshots you want, I don't care. You're overthinking it - it's holding the ball.

    O'Keefe was clearly aware of the game circumstances and put the whistle away. Craig Joubert blows that penalty, 100%. Wayne Barnes does too. They aren't afraid of the big call, even though it's bitten them a few times.

    But still, Blues were the better team, deserved the win, other things were missed, etc etc etc.

    Nice bait, but I don't think we have any French posters anymore.

    About 1:08 mins in

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • barbarianB Offline
    barbarianB Offline
    barbarian
    replied to KiwiMurph on last edited by
    #637

    @KiwiMurph It can still be holding if the defending team wins the ball. It should have been a quick, clean steal but he basically had to rip the ball off Romano.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • CrucialC Offline
    CrucialC Offline
    Crucial
    replied to barbarian on last edited by
    #638

    @barbarian said in SF Blues v Brumbies:

    @chimoaus said in SF Blues v Brumbies:

    @Steven-Harris said in SF Blues v Brumbies:

    @chimoaus i looks pretty daming , yes there may have been other calls that could have gone either way during the game , but you know what a team has time rectify any wrong doings ..but that call could have changed everything ..will take the win as a Blues supporter , but i will say i would have had no issues if the call had gone the other way ..

    Every incorrect/marginal call has a sliding doors moment that could heavily impact the outcome. If White was carded for cynical play on the ground or the Brumbies try was disallowed it would have had an impact. The call was 50/50 and the Blues got the rub of the green. If the Brumbies had held onto the ball instead of going for the drop goal they may have got a penalty and won.

    Sport will always have these moments and good teams take it out of the hand of the ref and focus on their roles and what they can do next.

    This post should be pinned in every match thread, and I agree with it wholeheartedly. Except for one thing: it wasn't a 50/50 call.

    It was the type of play that in minutes 1-75 it's a penalty to the defending team and nobody questions it. Isolated player on the ground, defender over the top on the ball. You can post all the screenshots you want, I don't care. You're overthinking it - it's holding the ball.

    O'Keefe was clearly aware of the game circumstances and put the whistle away. Craig Joubert blows that penalty, 100%. Wayne Barnes does too. They aren't afraid of the big call, even though it's bitten them a few times.

    But still, Blues were the better team, deserved the win, other things were missed, etc etc etc.

    IIRC Joubert would blow a penalty to the Blues. Just as he did when McCaw had both hands on that Waratahs ball in the 2014 final.

    ACT CrusaderA 1 Reply Last reply
    4
  • ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT Crusader
    replied to Crucial on last edited by
    #639

    @Crucial said in SF Blues v Brumbies:

    @barbarian said in SF Blues v Brumbies:

    @chimoaus said in SF Blues v Brumbies:

    @Steven-Harris said in SF Blues v Brumbies:

    @chimoaus i looks pretty daming , yes there may have been other calls that could have gone either way during the game , but you know what a team has time rectify any wrong doings ..but that call could have changed everything ..will take the win as a Blues supporter , but i will say i would have had no issues if the call had gone the other way ..

    Every incorrect/marginal call has a sliding doors moment that could heavily impact the outcome. If White was carded for cynical play on the ground or the Brumbies try was disallowed it would have had an impact. The call was 50/50 and the Blues got the rub of the green. If the Brumbies had held onto the ball instead of going for the drop goal they may have got a penalty and won.

    Sport will always have these moments and good teams take it out of the hand of the ref and focus on their roles and what they can do next.

    This post should be pinned in every match thread, and I agree with it wholeheartedly. Except for one thing: it wasn't a 50/50 call.

    It was the type of play that in minutes 1-75 it's a penalty to the defending team and nobody questions it. Isolated player on the ground, defender over the top on the ball. You can post all the screenshots you want, I don't care. You're overthinking it - it's holding the ball.

    O'Keefe was clearly aware of the game circumstances and put the whistle away. Craig Joubert blows that penalty, 100%. Wayne Barnes does too. They aren't afraid of the big call, even though it's bitten them a few times.

    But still, Blues were the better team, deserved the win, other things were missed, etc etc etc.

    IIRC Joubert would blow a penalty to the Blues. Just as he did when McCaw had both hands on that Waratahs ball in the 2014 final.

    Grrrrrr

    Shocking call made worst by him admitting days after the match that he got it wrong!

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Daffy JaffyD Offline
    Daffy JaffyD Offline
    Daffy Jaffy
    wrote on last edited by Daffy Jaffy
    #640

    Get Ofa my lawn -
    42fb5cf8-e6bd-464b-92fb-97ef25b75468-image.png

    J 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • NepiaN Online
    NepiaN Online
    Nepia
    replied to barbarian on last edited by
    #641

    @barbarian said in SF Blues v Brumbies:

    @chimoaus said in SF Blues v Brumbies:

    @Steven-Harris said in SF Blues v Brumbies:

    @chimoaus i looks pretty daming , yes there may have been other calls that could have gone either way during the game , but you know what a team has time rectify any wrong doings ..but that call could have changed everything ..will take the win as a Blues supporter , but i will say i would have had no issues if the call had gone the other way ..

    Every incorrect/marginal call has a sliding doors moment that could heavily impact the outcome. If White was carded for cynical play on the ground or the Brumbies try was disallowed it would have had an impact. The call was 50/50 and the Blues got the rub of the green. If the Brumbies had held onto the ball instead of going for the drop goal they may have got a penalty and won.

    Sport will always have these moments and good teams take it out of the hand of the ref and focus on their roles and what they can do next.

    This post should be pinned in every match thread, and I agree with it wholeheartedly. Except for one thing: it wasn't a 50/50 call.

    It was the type of play that in minutes 1-75 it's a penalty to the defending team and nobody questions it. Isolated player on the ground, defender over the top on the ball. You can post all the screenshots you want, I don't care. You're overthinking it - it's holding the ball.

    O'Keefe was clearly aware of the game circumstances and put the whistle away. Craig Joubert blows that penalty, 100%. Wayne Barnes does too. They aren't afraid of the big call, even though it's bitten them a few times.

    But still, Blues were the better team, deserved the win, other things were missed, etc etc etc.

    Swings and roundabouts - all those refs might have been tougher on where players join a maul or a maul not moving.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • J Offline
    J Offline
    junior
    replied to Daffy Jaffy on last edited by
    #642

    @Daffy-Jaffy said in SF Blues v Brumbies:

    Get Ofa my lawn -
    42fb5cf8-e6bd-464b-92fb-97ef25b75468-image.png

    That photo just tells me that Lolesio completely mis-hit the doppie - low trajectory, helicopter flight rather than end over end, head up early instead of down over the ball, Ofa barely 3 inches off the ground

    StargazerS 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • StargazerS Offline
    StargazerS Offline
    Stargazer
    replied to junior on last edited by
    #643

    @junior I agree, but what this photo can't show you is how close Ofa was to Lolesio and how fast he was running towards him.

    J 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • J Offline
    J Offline
    junior
    replied to Stargazer on last edited by
    #644

    @Stargazer said in SF Blues v Brumbies:

    @junior I agree, but what this photo can't show you is how close Ofa was to Lolesio and how fast he was running towards him.

    Good point - Ofa thundering down on him may have gone along way to putting him off

    StargazerS 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • StargazerS Offline
    StargazerS Offline
    Stargazer
    replied to junior on last edited by
    #645

    @junior It's seems quite scary to me haha.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1

SF Blues v Brumbies
Rugby Matches
bluesbrumbies
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.