• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

SF Blues v Brumbies

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Rugby Matches
bluesbrumbies
645 Posts 62 Posters 34.7k Views
SF Blues v Brumbies
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • gt12G Offline
    gt12G Offline
    gt12
    wrote on last edited by
    #470

    I’m supporting them, but the Blues kind of deserve to lose this.

    I don’t think either of these teams will beat the Saders.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT Crusader
    replied to chimoaus on last edited by
    #471

    @chimoaus said in SF Blues v Brumbies:

    Where are the Saders fans at the moment.

    Right here

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • NepiaN Offline
    NepiaN Offline
    Nepia
    wrote on last edited by
    #472

    How is a head clash "foul" play? Fair enough if they want to say it's reckless but there's no intent there, their heads just lined up - the actual tackle was below the shoulders.

    1 Reply Last reply
    6
  • A Offline
    A Offline
    akan004
    wrote on last edited by
    #473

    Blues have let them back in due to their stupidity. Annoying.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • DonsteppaD Offline
    DonsteppaD Offline
    Donsteppa
    wrote on last edited by
    #474

    Brumbies will still find a way to not cross the line...

    ACT CrusaderA 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • M Offline
    M Offline
    Machpants
    wrote on last edited by
    #475

    How can the brumbies join in front of the fucking ball carrier

    NepiaN gt12G taniwharugbyT 3 Replies Last reply
    7
  • NepiaN Offline
    NepiaN Offline
    Nepia
    replied to Machpants on last edited by
    #476

    @Machpants said in SF Blues v Brumbies:

    How can the brumbies join in front of the fucking ball carrier

    There seems to be a special set of Brumbies maul laws.

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • gt12G Offline
    gt12G Offline
    gt12
    replied to Machpants on last edited by gt12
    #477

    @Machpants said in SF Blues v Brumbies:

    How can the brumbies join in front of the fucking ball carrier

    Absolutely. What the fuck was that?

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT Crusader
    replied to Donsteppa on last edited by
    #478

    @Donsteppa said in SF Blues v Brumbies:

    Brumbies will still find a way to not cross the line...

    Yep.

    DonsteppaD 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • G Offline
    G Offline
    Gunner
    wrote on last edited by
    #479

    Give them a thousand chances at getting their static maul moving why don’t you O’fucking’keefe.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugby
    replied to Machpants on last edited by
    #480

    @Machpants yeah if the defending player does it, pen, but attacking team is allowed.

    Fickle rule

    M 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • DonsteppaD Offline
    DonsteppaD Offline
    Donsteppa
    replied to ACT Crusader on last edited by
    #481

    @ACT-Crusader said in SF Blues v Brumbies:

    @Donsteppa said in SF Blues v Brumbies:

    Brumbies will still find a way to not cross the line...

    Yep.

    Oops, I was counting on Big Ginge to contest that lineout.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • M Offline
    M Offline
    Machpants
    wrote on last edited by
    #482

    Again people hasn't off the mail. Just fucking get in there, it isn't going anywhere

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4life
    wrote on last edited by
    #483

    The reason is your "reffing" of the maul mate.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • CrucialC Offline
    CrucialC Offline
    Crucial
    wrote on last edited by
    #484

    Is there head contact? And Is there foul play? are two separate questions.
    Why is it treated that one equals the other?
    The refs always say “there was head contact so it’s foul”

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • BonesB Offline
    BonesB Offline
    Bones
    wrote on last edited by
    #485

    Not a problem at all. Plug it deep off the kick off, any ball back goes high into the 22.

    1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • FrankF Offline
    FrankF Offline
    Frank
    wrote on last edited by
    #486

    At the moment, the only things the Blues have in their favour is the clock.

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • K Offline
    K Offline
    kev
    wrote on last edited by
    #487

    BB. Haven’t had the ball for 20 minutes and you kick it away.

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • gt12G Offline
    gt12G Offline
    gt12
    wrote on last edited by
    #488

    The (reffing of the) maul is rugby’s second biggest problem.

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • M Offline
    M Offline
    Machpants
    replied to taniwharugby on last edited by
    #489

    @taniwharugby said in SF Blues v Brumbies:

    @Machpants yeah if the defending player does it, pen, but attacking team is allowed.

    Fickle rule

    Really? I don't think you're allowed to join in front of ball carrier.

    20-19, 14 v 15, 2:30 to go

    taniwharugbyT 1 Reply Last reply
    0

SF Blues v Brumbies
Rugby Matches
bluesbrumbies
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.