Aussie Cricket
-
Happy for the scorchers to get up, best side and Munro is very likeable and self effacing when mic'ed up. Scored a terrific ton early on and should really be a black cap in October world cup. Only kiwi to have 2 years t20 knowledge of Aussie wickets.
Also I'm still not sure how I feel about the Jordan Silk tactical substitution last game. One thing is for sure, if India pulled that trick in Oz there'd be hell to pay!!
-
After about 20 minutes last night I thought it was going to be a one sided win to the Sixers, but it ended up being the opposite.
Re: that tactical substitution in the last game, I suspect we’d have heard a lot more about it, had there not been that misfield on the boundary, and if a great throw then led to a run out review with centimetres in it…
-
@donsteppa said in Aussie Cricket:
After about 20 minutes last night I thought it was going to be a one sided win to the Sixers, but it ended up being the opposite.
Re: that tactical substitution in the last game, I suspect we’d have heard a lot more about it, had there not been that misfield on the boundary, and if a great throw then led to a run out review with centimetres in it…
It's an interesting one. Spirit of cricket issues aside since they had wickets in hand it was fine. Depending on how the umpire/match ref interpreted the retired hurt provisions the worst case scenario would be that he had to retire out rather than hurt. Being the last ball of the innings that doesn't really matter.
-
@cyclops said in Aussie Cricket:
@donsteppa said in Aussie Cricket:
After about 20 minutes last night I thought it was going to be a one sided win to the Sixers, but it ended up being the opposite.
Re: that tactical substitution in the last game, I suspect we’d have heard a lot more about it, had there not been that misfield on the boundary, and if a great throw then led to a run out review with centimetres in it…
It's an interesting one. Spirit of cricket issues aside since they had wickets in hand it was fine. Depending on how the umpire/match ref interpreted the retired hurt provisions the worst case scenario would be that he had to retire out rather than hurt. Being the last ball of the innings that doesn't really matter.
In my glancing interest in the TV sports news story I gathered that he straight out retired, I thought.
I have no problem with it personally.
-
Starc wins the Allan Border medal
• Male Test Player of the Year – Travis Head
• Male ODI Player of the Year – Mitchell Starc
• Male T20I Player of the Year – Mitchell Marsh
• Male Domestic Player of the Year – Travis HeadStarc sneaks in a swipe at Warne after winning first Border Medal
All-rounder Ash Gardner also put her name up in lights, becoming the first Indigenous cricketer to take home the Belinda Clark Award.
-
So CA offer Langer a six month contract extension, and Langer tells them to shove it and walks. The latest chapter in a sorry saga.
Which results in wailing and gnashing of teeth from ex-players, who think Langer has been fed to the wolves by a cabal of greedy selfish players and media.
Impartial, considered commentators like (cough) Matt Hayden have weighed in... https://www.abc.net.au/news/2022-02-05/cricket-australia-matthew-hayden-defends-justin-langer/100807674
It's a mess and CA have to own that. But the entitlement and hypocrisy shown by the ex-players is just breathtaking here. Langer was clearly a volatile bloke and the players didn't like him. In cricket that's more than enough cause to show you the door.
-
I’d have more sympathy for the players if they weren’t also broadly the same group of people who thought using sandpaper on the ball wasn’t the worst idea in the world. (Though of course the bowling group “didn’t know”……)
Langer does sound quite old school, and given how fragile some of the English players sounded during the Ashes, I’m not sure that he’d go well there for all the hype about it.
Because of the breakdown in the relationships, the outcome for Langer and the Australian side is inevitable, but the players and CA also deserve quite a few of the serves they are getting from Ricky Ponting, Adam Gilchrist, and co. Especially given one of the alleged ringleaders and his history in recent years.
-
@barbarian said in Aussie Cricket:
Langer was clearly a volatile bloke and the players didn't like him. In cricket that's more than enough cause to show you the door.
In cricket I think it should be the captains team, not the coaches. The coach should be there to provide support for the captain
The most important question is whether Cummins wanted to work with him or not
-
It should have been handled by CA before the end of the Ashes. They should have seen the writing on the wall, and given Langer the chance to go out on his own terms before the Hobart test.
Now maybe Langer would have thrown his toys at that point, but that's a risk worth taking to avoid where we are now.
I feel for the players. They were asked for their opinion as part of the process, and provided it. Now they are branded as precious egomaniacs, but where is the evidence that they are?
If the coach was a pyscho who made them uncomfortable, should they have lied to allow him to keep his job?
-
-
-
@bovidae said in Aussie Cricket:
I read that it was only some players who weren't happy with Langer. Have the publicised who they were?
Midway through last year a group of senior players approached CA to complain about Langer. They were Tim Paine, Aaron Finch and Pat Cummins. You would assume they represented the wider cohort.
I'd think if the players weren't united on this one we would know about it. Nobody has broken ranks thus far.
-
@nta said in Aussie Cricket:
@bovidae said in Aussie Cricket:
I read that it was only some players who weren't happy with Langer. Have the publicised who they were?
Not in so many words, but Cummins is clearly not.
Yes, the same article said that Cummins hasn't endorsed Langer. Lehmann also reckoned that 4 years was enough for any coach.
