Taranaki v Hawkes Bay
-
-
@higgins said in Taranaki v Hawkes Bay:
@tj But the ref did. By referring it is a clear indication the he saw the grounding. WHy the need to refer it if he allegedy saw a grounding. PLayers do not usually blow up against refs decisions without good reason.
I think he assumed it was grounded, then the players blew up at him so he thought he'd check... He definitely was not confident he saw it grounded.
-
-
-
@kiwimurph said in Taranaki v Hawkes Bay:
@nepia said in Taranaki v Hawkes Bay:
Pies need to adjust to his ruck reffing
You've been watching Collingwood too much.
I don't watch aerial ping ping so don't get the reference outside of Collingwood having the best uniform in the AFL.
-
-
A nice rearward penalty kick there by the Magpies as they set up for a lineout drive try. The TAB now have the 'Naki at $1.11 HB 1t $5.25, very tempting odds there! Nothing comes for the drive other than another two penalties and a couple more penalty advantages. The last comes to a try by L McLutchie. The conversion from out wide misses
Taranaki 19 - 05 HB after about 35 minutes -
@kiwimurph said in Taranaki v Hawkes Bay:
Maybe THAT'S why McLutchie didn't play Super....
I think we also know why Enari doesn't get game time for the Crusaders. I think it's 4 passes to space so far. Hopefully we can fix him as the season goes on.
-
How shit is Enari's passing?
-
For a whistle happy ref, his judgement of these mauls leaves a lot to be desired.
