All Blacks v Tonga
-
-
@pukunui said in All Blacks v Tonga:
The fact he was given a rating of 9 in that player rating article just demonstrates the poor quality of journalism in NZ.
Though to be frank, it's more accurate than the collective pile-in that went on on here. Reading this thread you would have thought you were watching a meltdown of Colin Farrell proportions.
-
@crucial said in All Blacks v Tonga:
@pukunui said in All Blacks v Tonga:
@mn5 Im ok with 5 tries being an automatic 10 rating.
I’m not sure that 5 tries in a drubbing against a barely NPC level opponent deserves a “yeah boi!” though
True. Yeah boi’s should be reserved for bigger occasions.
-
@chris-b said in All Blacks v Tonga:
@pukunui said in All Blacks v Tonga:
The fact he was given a rating of 9 in that player rating article just demonstrates the poor quality of journalism in NZ.
Though to be frank, it's more accurate than the collective pile-in that went on on here. Reading this thread you would have thought you were watching a meltdown of Colin Farrell proportions.
Yeah maybe, but a group of unpaid, old/youth adjacent blokes posing as experts on an internet forum should be given a bit more slack than someone claiming to be a sports journalist.
A 5 or 6 is probably fair when compared to what others got.
So the score of 9 was 3-4 too high.
Tsf probably 3-4 too low if the comments reflect a score of 1 or 2. -
@chris-b said in All Blacks v Tonga:
@pukunui said in All Blacks v Tonga:
The fact he was given a rating of 9 in that player rating article just demonstrates the poor quality of journalism in NZ.
Though to be frank, it's more accurate than the collective pile-in that went on on here. Reading this thread you would have thought you were watching a meltdown of Colin Farrell proportions.
Match threads used to be worth a read, now it's like I am reading Planet Rugby. What happened to the learned posts we used to occasionally get?
-
@crazy-horse said in All Blacks v Tonga:
@chris-b said in All Blacks v Tonga:
@pukunui said in All Blacks v Tonga:
The fact he was given a rating of 9 in that player rating article just demonstrates the poor quality of journalism in NZ.
Though to be frank, it's more accurate than the collective pile-in that went on on here. Reading this thread you would have thought you were watching a meltdown of Colin Farrell proportions.
Match threads used to be worth a read, now it's like I am reading Planet Rugby. What happened to the learned posts we used to occasionally get?
Bridge has got a whole heap of white knighters at PR so the thread went the other way, he got praise for each metre he ran.
-
@nepia I don't expect any better on PR, but the Fern was always better than some of the dross we get every match thread now.
I know I am becoming a bit if a broken record on this, but I like this place and it is bugging me match threads have gone this way.
-
@crazy-horse I'd forgotten all about Planet Rugby. I don't think I've looked at that place for about 15 years.
-
@crazy-horse said in All Blacks v Tonga:
@chris-b said in All Blacks v Tonga:
@pukunui said in All Blacks v Tonga:
The fact he was given a rating of 9 in that player rating article just demonstrates the poor quality of journalism in NZ.
Though to be frank, it's more accurate than the collective pile-in that went on on here. Reading this thread you would have thought you were watching a meltdown of Colin Farrell proportions.
Match threads used to be worth a read, now it's like I am reading Planet Rugby. What happened to the learned posts we used to occasionally get?
I can only type so fast.
-
@pukunui said in All Blacks v Tonga:
I actually had a similar thought during the game. That maybe Bridge would make a better midfielder than wing. Similar style to Crotty. Not particularly fast or dynamic but just dare i say it…..safe.
Whatever position he is he shouldn’t be anywhere near the ABs.The fact he was given a rating of 9 in that player rating article just demonstrates the poor quality of journalism in NZ.
I’ve been saying he should be a fullback for the last couple of years.
The issue is his lack of foot work. An AB winger should be have top quality foot work that puts off defenders. Bridge doesn’t have it but every successful AB winger has had it. Even our wingers that were famous for running over people had great feet.
At fullback he could still do his tidy work at the end of the chain. Picking and choosing when to join the line would make space for others. He seems tidy under the high ball, not sure how good his kicking game is though
The problem he has is he needs to it at SR level. He seems unlikely to get game time there at the Crusaders. Maybe If Jordan is considered a winger now that will change (and Havili a 12)
-
@crazy-horse said in All Blacks v Tonga:
I know I am becoming a bit if a broken record on this
Yes. Post something constructive yourself
Whinging about whinging is tedious and lowers the tone further
-
@crazy-horse said in All Blacks v Tonga:
@nepia I don't expect any better on PR, but the Fern was always better than some of the dross we get every match thread now.
I know I am becoming a bit if a broken record on this, but I like this place and it is bugging me match threads have gone this way.
I can't say I personally have really noticed a bunch of math threads have "gone this way" recently as I feel they've always been like this.
Bridge was copping it in that first half (I think deservedly, a few others not so much, but as I said in the thread I don't think he's 100% full fitness) which spilt into the second half probably more due to TJ hyping him up than anything else.
The same happens with other poor performing players. Blues halfbacks cop it regularly, Blackwell cops it in Canes matches, everyones favourite bros have copped it lots.
I think a pure match thread, which is good for following the game, would lose some of the humour and energy that makes them worthwhile. I've spent some Sunday mornings reading back through a match thread just cracking up. But part of that is it's posters just expressing their feelings in the heat of the moment.
But, I can understand if it's not for you anymore, I blocked the Politics section of this place for that reason.
-
This post is deleted!
-
-
-
@duluth said in All Blacks v Tonga:
Too many other options.. maybe he should move?
Are any of the other franchises searching for a fullback? The Chiefs could be if the DMac Japan deal is official.
Be interesting to see what Warren does with the Chiefs if DMac isn't around as this year most of the game was designed around him on multiple phases.
-
-
@duluth said in All Blacks v Tonga:
@pukunui said in All Blacks v Tonga:
I actually had a similar thought during the game. That maybe Bridge would make a better midfielder than wing. Similar style to Crotty. Not particularly fast or dynamic but just dare i say it…..safe.
Whatever position he is he shouldn’t be anywhere near the ABs.The fact he was given a rating of 9 in that player rating article just demonstrates the poor quality of journalism in NZ.
I’ve been saying he should be a fullback for the last couple of years.
The issue is his lack of foot work. An AB winger should be have top quality foot work that puts off defenders. Bridge doesn’t have it but every successful AB winger has had it. Even our wingers that were famous for running over people had great feet.
At fullback he could still do his tidy work at the end of the chain. Picking and choosing when to join the line would make space for others. He seems tidy under the high ball, not sure how good his kicking game is though
The problem he has is he needs to it at SR level. He seems unlikely to get game time their at the Crusaders. Maybe If Jordan is considered a winger now that will change (and Havili a 12)
In the middle of a match you get reaction posts not well thought out analysis. In a way that is interesting in itself as you a seeing what comes to people's minds first up.
With regard to you know who, it was, to me anyway, a critique based on his position. He's meant to be a finisher but has proven to only be able to finish if given an open run to the line. This was said before the match and proven true in the first minute. As the game went on the position only solidified.
But, the guy has rugby skills and a good head on him. I wish I had half his ability skill wise.
Trouble is that we don't want a winger that goes and does the centres' job for them (I'm assuming here that isn't part of a clever gameplay). The wingers job is to get that ball over the line after the work has been done and the opportunity created. Even those sticking up for him here can surely see that he lacks in that area.
Did he have a good game rugby wise? Yes. As a winger? Hell no.
