Chiefs v Rebels
-
@steven-harris chiefs should have been given the first try, holding on penalty in the 22 was shit as he was on the man and not the ball. But I agree, the handling from the Chiefs has been poor and they're their own worst enemy
-
We are hot on attack and he allows them to literally jump the ruck and take out our HB.
We set a maul, their 7 cones around the side, he warns him, then the guy pushes through and our maul breaks up. Nothing.
Rebels knock on in the scrum. Nothing.
We get a guy over the ball who - finally - gets the turnover, then gets hammered, they get a man over the ball, and then he gets done for holding on.
Those are just the ones I can remember without checking the thread.
The Rebels are playing well, and the Chiefs are playing very poorly (especially the set piece has gone to shit, but that’s unsurprising as it always does once Brown goes to lock), so its not only the ref, but he is also fucking incompetent.
-
@gt12 you have made so many line breaks .,you were up 19-0 against a team who could not take trick in the first 25 minutes ..as I said still believe there is a massive difference in skill level ..try looking inwardly
-
@steven-harris said in Chiefs v Rebels:
@gt12 you have made so many line breaks .,you were up 19-0 against a team who could not take trick in the first 25 minutes ..as I said still believe there is a massive difference in skill level ..try looking inwardly
I dont coach them. I come here to complain.
-
Stupid rule
-
@gt12 ok now I understand where coming from .,
-
@steven-harris said in Chiefs v Rebels:
@gt12 ok now I understand where coming from .,
I can be rationale when the Chiefs or ABs are not playing, but when they are on the field, different story.
-
-
The Chiefs better switch on to this ref's ruck interpretations if they want to run away with this.
-
@antipodean they did, Sowakula was playing the man not the ball but didn't get the penalty.
