• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

Super Rugby Trans Tasman

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
634 Posts 59 Posters 40.2k Views
Super Rugby Trans Tasman
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurph
    wrote on last edited by
    #276

    If they are going to run the same format next year having a week off between domestic finals and round 1 trans Ta$man makes sense.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Dan54D Offline
    Dan54D Offline
    Dan54
    replied to shark on last edited by
    #277

    @shark said in Super Rugby Trans Ta$man:

    The future is clear. The only way to make the draw fair for Australian teams is to regularly intersperse those 'ouchie' games against NZ opposition, with numerous points-building home derbies, and to play 75% of games at home.

    Yep if we play same format next year we will get same results, they need to mix up the games.

    KiwiMurphK sharkS 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurph
    replied to Dan54 on last edited by
    #278

    @dan54 Not sure that's the answer. The benefit of the domestic Aus comp is they get a guaranteed Aus winner - look at the success of the Au final.

    antipodeanA 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • SnowyS Offline
    SnowyS Offline
    Snowy
    replied to shark on last edited by Snowy
    #279

    @shark said in Super Rugby Trans Ta$man:

    and to play 75% of games at home.

    So try distort the results? Should we give them a points start as well?

    I'm not having a crack at you, just that it still has to be as fair a comp as possible. We haven't had that for years anyway, with guaranteed home finals and conferences but I wouldn't like to see us regress to that sort of thing. The Aussies will get better by playing better teams all of the time, both home and away.

    sharkS 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • antipodeanA Offline
    antipodeanA Offline
    antipodean
    replied to KiwiMurph on last edited by
    #280

    @kiwimurph said in Super Rugby Trans Ta$man:

    @dan54 Not sure that's the answer. The benefit of the domestic Aus comp is they get a guaranteed Aus winner - look at the success of the Au final.

    I'd expand the Aussie SR comp to 10 teams, providing a pathway for players and more content for broadcasters.

    D 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • sharkS Offline
    sharkS Offline
    shark
    replied to Snowy on last edited by
    #281

    @snowy said in Super Rugby Trans Ta$man:

    @shark said in Super Rugby Trans Ta$man:

    and to play 75% of games at home.

    So try distort the results? Should we give them a points start as well?

    I'm not having a crack at you, just that it still has to be as fair a comp as possible. We haven't had that for years anyway, with guaranteed home finals and conferences but I wouldn't like to see us regress to that sort of thing. The Aussies will get better by playing better teams all of the time, both home and away.

    I was taking the piss. Of course there shouldn't be any concessions just because Australia can't turn out competitive sides. That would make the comp a sham on a greater scale even than the conference finals rep system we used to have.

    SnowyS 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • sharkS Offline
    sharkS Offline
    shark
    replied to Dan54 on last edited by
    #282

    @dan54 said in Super Rugby Trans Ta$man:

    @shark said in Super Rugby Trans Ta$man:

    The future is clear. The only way to make the draw fair for Australian teams is to regularly intersperse those 'ouchie' games against NZ opposition, with numerous points-building home derbies, and to play 75% of games at home.

    Yep if we play same format next year we will get same results, they need to mix up the games.

    Or even if we play a full round robin we could get a scenario where an Australian side goes well in local derbies, can't beat NZ opposition, but makes the finals because the NZ teams beat each other up.

    antipodeanA nzzpN 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • SnowyS Offline
    SnowyS Offline
    Snowy
    replied to shark on last edited by
    #283

    @shark said in Super Rugby Trans Ta$man:

    @snowy said in Super Rugby Trans Ta$man:

    @shark said in Super Rugby Trans Ta$man:

    and to play 75% of games at home.

    So try distort the results? Should we give them a points start as well?

    I'm not having a crack at you, just that it still has to be as fair a comp as possible. We haven't had that for years anyway, with guaranteed home finals and conferences but I wouldn't like to see us regress to that sort of thing. The Aussies will get better by playing better teams all of the time, both home and away.

    I was taking the piss. Of course there shouldn't be any concessions just because Australia can't turn out competitive sides. That would make the comp a sham on a greater scale even than the conference finals rep system we used to have.

    Yes it would, not sure that we are finding solutions to the "super" TT being a bit shit though. Home and away for the top couple of teams from each SRA might work, with a final at the end? Dunno haven't thought enough about it.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • antipodeanA Offline
    antipodeanA Offline
    antipodean
    replied to shark on last edited by
    #284

    @shark said in Super Rugby Trans Ta$man:

    @dan54 said in Super Rugby Trans Ta$man:

    @shark said in Super Rugby Trans Ta$man:

    The future is clear. The only way to make the draw fair for Australian teams is to regularly intersperse those 'ouchie' games against NZ opposition, with numerous points-building home derbies, and to play 75% of games at home.

    Yep if we play same format next year we will get same results, they need to mix up the games.

    Or even if we play a full round robin we could get a scenario where an Australian side goes well in local derbies, can't beat NZ opposition, but makes the finals because the NZ teams beat each other up.

    The situation we had in the semifinals with the conference system.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • BovidaeB Offline
    BovidaeB Offline
    Bovidae
    wrote on last edited by
    #285

    Here are your referees for Round 3.

    Hurricanes v Force
    Friday 28 May, 7:05pm
    McLean Park, Napier
    Referee: James Doleman
    Assistant 1: Ben O’Keeffe
    Assistant 2: Brendon Pickerill
    TMO: Mike Fraser

    Waratahs v Crusaders
    Saturday 29 May, 5:05pm
    WIN Stadium, Wollongong
    Referee: Graham Cooper
    Assistant 1: Matt Kellehan
    Assistant 2: James Quinn
    TMO: James Leckie

    Blues v Brumbies
    Saturday 29 May, 7:15pm (NOTE 7:15PM KICK OFF)
    Eden Park, Auckland
    Referee: Damon Murphy
    Assistant 1: Ben O’Keeffe
    Assistant 2: Lauren Jenner
    TMO: Glenn Newman

    Reds v Chiefs
    Saturday 29 May, 9:45pm
    Queensland Country Bank Stadium, Townsville
    Referee: Nic Berry
    Assistant 1: Reuben Keane
    Assistant 2: Brett Cronan
    TMO: Ian Smith

    Highlanders v Rebels
    Sunday 30 May, 2.35pm (NOTE 2:35PM KICK OFF)
    Sir John Davies Oval, Queenstown
    Referee: Paul Williams
    Assistant 1: Brendon Pickerill
    Assistant 2: James Doleman
    TMO: Mike Fraser

    A TimT 2 Replies Last reply
    1
  • D Offline
    D Offline
    Derpus
    replied to antipodean on last edited by Derpus
    #286

    @antipodean I'm pretty sure this is tongue in cheek but it's my preference.

    The Aussie SR sides won't be competitive with their NZ counterparts. Even with major structural reform and a sudden influx of cash that meant we could actually retain our talent, it'd still take years (five to ten at least), before they are up to speed.

    TT is a complete non-starter.

    To be honest, it's kind of hard to see how RA gets itself out of this death spiral at all. Every single alternative option for players is more attractive. Salaries in Japan and Europe are only bettered by the salaries in AFL and NRL.

    A 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • A Offline
    A Offline
    ARHS
    replied to Bovidae on last edited by
    #287

    @bovidae Chiefs lucked out with choice of Assistant 2.

    CrucialC 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • CrucialC Offline
    CrucialC Offline
    Crucial
    replied to ARHS on last edited by
    #288

    @arhs said in Super Rugby Trans Ta$man:

    @bovidae Chiefs lucked out with choice of Assistant 2.

    It's OK we have Smithy as TMO. He'll help out.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • TimT Away
    TimT Away
    Tim
    replied to Bovidae on last edited by
    #289

    @bovidae said in Super Rugby Trans Ta$man:

    Damon Murphy

    Hope there isn't a big change in the way the scrums are reffed.

    BovidaeB 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • BovidaeB Offline
    BovidaeB Offline
    Bovidae
    replied to Tim on last edited by
    #290

    @tim Murphy has usually rewarded the dominant scrum. He also has blown plenty of penalties and is not afraid to dish out the cards.

    I'm expecting the Brumbies to use the lineout drive more. Force the Blues to defend or concede penalties and YCs.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • nzzpN Offline
    nzzpN Offline
    nzzp
    replied to shark on last edited by
    #291

    @shark said in Super Rugby Trans Ta$man:

    @dan54 said in Super Rugby Trans Ta$man:

    @shark said in Super Rugby Trans Ta$man:

    The future is clear. The only way to make the draw fair for Australian teams is to regularly intersperse those 'ouchie' games against NZ opposition, with numerous points-building home derbies, and to play 75% of games at home.

    Yep if we play same format next year we will get same results, they need to mix up the games.

    Or even if we play a full round robin we could get a scenario where an Australian side goes well in local derbies, can't beat NZ opposition, but makes the finals because the NZ teams beat each other up.

    you mean, Super15-18, 2011-2019...

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • A Offline
    A Offline
    ARHS
    replied to Derpus on last edited by
    #292

    @derpus disagree totally. You keep more quality players in Aus by giving them a more meaningful local program. Playing kiwi sides does that. They will be better for it and depth will improve as the Jersey becomes more attractive.

    KiwiwombleK D 2 Replies Last reply
    1
  • KiwiwombleK Offline
    KiwiwombleK Offline
    Kiwiwomble
    replied to ARHS on last edited by
    #293

    @arhs i mean up until last year there was an even MORE meaningful comp and aussie (and nz) was still losing players overseas

    what was the record the Highlanders stuffed up a few years ago? 25 wins in a row to NZ teams over aussie ones

    SnowyS 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • SnowyS Offline
    SnowyS Offline
    Snowy
    replied to Kiwiwomble on last edited by
    #294

    @kiwiwomble said in Super Rugby Trans Ta$man:

    what was the record the Highlanders stuffed up a few years ago? 25 wins in a row to NZ teams over aussie ones

    Hopeless your lot. We can try for better this year. Don't let us down.

    KiwiwombleK 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • D Offline
    D Offline
    Derpus
    replied to ARHS on last edited by Derpus
    #295

    @arhs i think its a stretch to suggest participating in a yearly whitewash is more meaningful than just about any alternative, including playing in an entirely different sport.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0

Super Rugby Trans Tasman
Sports Talk
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.