• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

Super Rugby Trans Tasman

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
634 Posts 59 Posters 40.2k Views
Super Rugby Trans Tasman
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • KirwanK Offline
    KirwanK Offline
    Kirwan
    wrote on last edited by
    #198

    Maybe we need the Trans Ta$man company first, then Aotearoa. It’s been a let down for me so far.

    Aussies are getting chewed up and spat out.

    sparkyS 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • sparkyS Offline
    sparkyS Offline
    sparky
    replied to Kirwan on last edited by
    #199

    @kirwan said in Super Rugby Trans Ta$man:

    Maybe we need the Trans Ta$man company first, then Aotearoa. It’s been a let down for me so far.

    Aussies are getting chewed up and spat out.

    If they are going come play with the big boys, five Aussie teams is far too many. They simply don't have the playing depth to compete.

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • sparkyS Offline
    sparkyS Offline
    sparky
    wrote on last edited by sparky
    #200

    Nine games gone. Nine Kiwis wins. Aussie teams looking out of their depth. This is going to be all about NZ teams can keep grinding out the winning bonus point to make the finalm

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • F Offline
    F Offline
    Frye
    replied to NTA on last edited by
    #201

    @nta said in Force v Highlanders:

    @frye said in Force v Highlanders:

    Almost like Australia would be better off with 3-4 teams...

    Not really.

    Better coaching and better systems would be more help.

    Maybe, but in hindsight neither is it the height of arrogance, just to suggest it, that many thought it to be last year.

    NTAN 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • sparkyS Offline
    sparkyS Offline
    sparky
    wrote on last edited by sparky
    #202

    Ten games gone. Two weeks gone. No Aussie wins. A fair few hammerings. Format change needed before next year.

    Canes4lifeC 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • NTAN Offline
    NTAN Offline
    NTA
    replied to Frye on last edited by
    #203

    @frye ok let's shrink Australian Rugby, hand it a pistol, and just wait for it to shoot itself.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • BonesB Offline
    BonesB Offline
    Bones
    wrote on last edited by
    #204

    Strictly.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • CrucialC Offline
    CrucialC Offline
    Crucial
    wrote on last edited by
    #205

    Sum of the parts and Oz have the players for a decent Wobbs side. But spread over 5 franchises? Nah. Only competitive amongst themselves.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • D Offline
    D Offline
    delicatessen
    wrote on last edited by
    #206

    Blues and Canes the only teams in control of their destiny atm..... That's pretty silly 40% of the way thru a comp.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT Crusader
    wrote on last edited by
    #207

    There’s now added interest in this comp with the NZ teams 10-0. Who is going to crack first?

    Canes4lifeC StargazerS 2 Replies Last reply
    1
  • F Offline
    F Offline
    Frye
    wrote on last edited by
    #208

    @nta said in Force v Highlanders:

    @frye ok let's shrink Australian Rugby, hand it a pistol, and just wait for it to shoot itself.

    Hysterical response.

    NTAN 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Canes4lifeC Online
    Canes4lifeC Online
    Canes4life
    replied to ACT Crusader on last edited by
    #209

    @act-crusader I wonder what the odds are of NZ teams going unbeaten. Could very well happen.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • StargazerS Offline
    StargazerS Offline
    Stargazer
    replied to ACT Crusader on last edited by
    #210

    @act-crusader Unless the Force prove to be a banana skin again, I can only see the Brumbies or Reds beat NZ teams. This weekend, the Brumbies play the Blues in Auckland and the Reds play the Chiefs at home.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • Canes4lifeC Online
    Canes4lifeC Online
    Canes4life
    replied to sparky on last edited by
    #211

    @sparky format change? You mean just keep it as Super Aotearoa?

    StargazerS 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • StargazerS Offline
    StargazerS Offline
    Stargazer
    replied to Canes4life on last edited by
    #212

    @canes4life I may be wrong, but I think @sparky means that they should no longer first have a SRA and SR AU, followed by a SR TT.

    I don't think that's what it's going to be if we get a 12 team comp. I expect an 11 week round robin in which franchises play each other once, home or away, followed by a Final (maybe with semi-finals).

    IIRC, Australia still hasn't agreed to a comp with Fijian Drua and Moana Pasifika though.

    sparkyS 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • NTAN Offline
    NTAN Offline
    NTA
    replied to Frye on last edited by
    #213

    @frye it's already on life support in a lot of ways.

    We've shipped dozens of professional players overseas already. But sure, let's shrink the opportunities here further. That'll fix it. Hunnerdpahcent.

    KirwanK 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • KirwanK Offline
    KirwanK Offline
    Kirwan
    replied to NTA on last edited by Kirwan
    #214

    @nta said in Force v Highlanders:

    @frye it's already on life support in a lot of ways.

    We've shipped dozens of professional players overseas already. But sure, let's shrink the opportunities here further. That'll fix it. Hunnerdpahcent.

    It actually would, as part of a Comp with NZ and Pacific nations. Three strong teams that actually can compete, success would help bring fans and sponsors.

    Much better for the national team too.

    NTAN 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • KirwanK Offline
    KirwanK Offline
    Kirwan
    wrote on last edited by
    #215

    Another option would be to add one or two NZ sides to weaken them. Not sure that ends up with a marketable product though.

    M 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • M Offline
    M Offline
    Machpants
    wrote on last edited by
    #216

    The fact that it is only NZ vs Oz games makes the results more stark. A few years ago OZ teams were losing everything vs NZ, but it was interspersed by games against SA, Arg, Jpn, and other Ozzies - thus didn't look so bad.

    Even Razor is sad -

    https://www.stuff.co.nz/sport/rugby/super-rugby/300314478/super-rugby-scott-robertson-regrets-gulf-after-reds-rout-in-kiwi-clean-sweep

    StargazerS 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • M Offline
    M Offline
    Machpants
    replied to Kirwan on last edited by Machpants
    #217

    @kirwan said in Force v Highlanders:

    Another option would be to add one or two NZ sides to weaken them. Not sure that ends up with a marketable product though.

    They're already planning on that with Moana P!

    And the Ozzie comp was compelling, so when you're all playing at a similar level it is not so bad.

    KirwanK 1 Reply Last reply
    1

Super Rugby Trans Tasman
Sports Talk
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.