• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

Super Rugby Trans Tasman

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
634 Posts 59 Posters 40.2k Views
Super Rugby Trans Tasman
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • SiamS Offline
    SiamS Offline
    Siam
    replied to Crucial on last edited by
    #127

    @crucial a bit of leeway as Marionus (spelling? - head of ARU) said the draw had to be done weeks ago, and I guess there's a health crisis that makes things a tad less flexible, logistically.

    CrucialC boobooB 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugby
    wrote on last edited by taniwharugby
    #128

    While 5-0 won't really surprise anyone, was the quality (or lack of) that was of concern (from some of our teams too)

    Hopefully round 2 will be better as teams adjust and settle in.

    Sadly I dont see the officiating improving which has an impact on the games (but this is an ongoing issue)

    K 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • D Offline
    D Offline
    Derpus
    wrote on last edited by
    #129

    The whole thing is pointless. Unless there are pretty dramatic changes Aus will never be competitive.

    It was actually fun playing ourselves.

    KirwanK 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • CrucialC Offline
    CrucialC Offline
    Crucial
    replied to Siam on last edited by
    #130

    @siam said in Super Rugby Trans Ta$man:

    @crucial a bit of leeway as Marionus (spelling? - head of ARU) said the draw had to be done weeks ago, and I guess there's a health crisis that makes things a tad less flexible, logistically.

    Just seems like they didn’t take a step back and look at what they created to ask the question is anyone advantaged/ disadvantaged by this and how well will this work after finals.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • KruseK Offline
    KruseK Offline
    Kruse
    wrote on last edited by
    #131

    Optimistically...
    ...maybe we'll only get the insipid "What was it like playing some different opposition from across the Ta$man?", or "What was it like playing a team with a different style after so long playing just <countrymen>?"
    .... on the first round.
    And - the next 4 rounds... they'll have to come up with more interesting questions?

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • KirwanK Offline
    KirwanK Offline
    Kirwan
    replied to Derpus on last edited by
    #132

    @derpus said in Super Rugby Trans Ta$man:

    The whole thing is pointless. Unless there are pretty dramatic changes Aus will never be competitive.

    It was actually fun playing ourselves.

    Drop down to three teams to better utilise your depth and you’d have more success, and that would flow into the national team.

    D KruseK 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • D Offline
    D Offline
    Derpus
    replied to Kirwan on last edited by
    #133

    @kirwan not a solution. The shrink to greatness nonsense is just a prolonged death.

    KirwanK 1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • K Offline
    K Offline
    kev
    replied to taniwharugby on last edited by
    #134

    @taniwharugby said in Super Rugby Trans Ta$man:

    While 5-0 won't really surprise anyone, was the quality (or lack of) that was of concern (from some of our teams too)

    Hopefully round 2 will be better as teams adjust and settle in.

    Sadly I dont see the officiating improving which has an impact on the games (but this is an ongoing issue)

    It seems that the yellow card thing is now being over done. The worst is the player on the wrong side slowing down the ball. Most are not deliberate but treated as such. If you make a dominant tackle ( I thought that was the aim ) you will always be at risk here. Don’t think these non deliberate penalties should contribute to offences adding up to a yellow card.

    BonesB 1 Reply Last reply
    6
  • boobooB Offline
    boobooB Offline
    booboo
    replied to Siam on last edited by
    #135

    @siam said in Super Rugby Trans Ta$man:

    @crucial a bit of leeway as Marionus (spelling? - head of ARU) said the draw had to be done weeks ago, and I guess there's a health crisis that makes things a tad less flexible, logistically.

    Marinos

    CrucialC 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • CrucialC Offline
    CrucialC Offline
    Crucial
    replied to booboo on last edited by
    #136

    @booboo said in Super Rugby Trans Ta$man:

    @siam said in Super Rugby Trans Ta$man:

    @crucial a bit of leeway as Marionus (spelling? - head of ARU) said the draw had to be done weeks ago, and I guess there's a health crisis that makes things a tad less flexible, logistically.

    Marinos

    alt text

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • KirwanK Offline
    KirwanK Offline
    Kirwan
    replied to Derpus on last edited by
    #137

    @derpus said in Super Rugby Trans Ta$man:

    @kirwan not a solution. The shrink to greatness nonsense is just a prolonged death.

    Not sure how getting thrashed by 50 helps your game.

    D 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • M Offline
    M Offline
    Machpants
    wrote on last edited by
    #138

    I've noticed that the Australian coverage is more zoomed in than the norm, do it's easy to see what each ball carrier is doing. Much harder to see the big picture tho

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • KruseK Offline
    KruseK Offline
    Kruse
    replied to Kirwan on last edited by
    #139

    @kirwan said in Super Rugby Trans Ta$man:

    @derpus said in Super Rugby Trans Ta$man:

    The whole thing is pointless. Unless there are pretty dramatic changes Aus will never be competitive.

    It was actually fun playing ourselves.

    Drop down to three teams to better utilise your depth and you’d have more success, and that would flow into the national team.

    LOL. I was going to suggest the same thing, but knew it would be like throwing advice against a brick wall.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • D Offline
    D Offline
    Derpus
    replied to Kirwan on last edited by
    #140

    @kirwan its not, hence my preference for a domestic comp. P'raps its a pipedream.

    KiapK 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • KiapK Offline
    KiapK Offline
    Kiap
    replied to Derpus on last edited by Kiap
    #141

    @derpus said in Super Rugby Trans Ta$man:

    @kirwan its not, hence my preference for a domestic comp. P'raps its a pipedream.

    I suspect we will get a domestic comp next year. As Reds boss Jeff "Ginge" Miller said this week, all oz franchises want it.

    McClellan has good spidey senses and does read the tea leaves -- even if the sheepish Marinos does not.

    Of course, that's not going to be to the exclusion of a combined ANZ comp - but what that is ain't exactly clear ...

    Dan54D 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • BonesB Offline
    BonesB Offline
    Bones
    replied to kev on last edited by
    #142

    @kev said in Super Rugby Trans Ta$man:

    If you make a dominant tackle ( I thought that was the aim ) you will always be at risk here.

    Sure but how dominant is your tackle if you're the one that is ending up in the wrong position and have no control over it? If you can't make a "dominant" tackle without ending up on the wrong side, then you should probably not try eh, or work on your technique.

    We don't excuse a forward pass just because "he was trying a really really big pass".

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • K Offline
    K Offline
    kev
    wrote on last edited by
    #143

    @bones said in Super Rugby Trans Ta$man:

    @kev said in Super Rugby Trans Ta$man:

    If you make a dominant tackle ( I thought that was the aim ) you will always be at risk here.

    Sure but how dominant is your tackle if you're the one that is ending up in the wrong position and have no control over it? If you can't make a "dominant" tackle without ending up on the wrong side, then you should probably not try eh, or work on your technique.

    We don't excuse a forward pass just because "he was trying a really really big pass".

    Different point I think. Sure for the penalty. But lots of times guys can’t move despite best efforts because the arriving players lock them in. Some who don’t try, just wrap and stay. Judgement as always. Just saying it’s only the cynical ones that should be considered for yellow cards.

    BonesB 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • BonesB Offline
    BonesB Offline
    Bones
    replied to kev on last edited by
    #144

    @kev said in Super Rugby Trans Ta$man:

    But lots of times guys can’t move despite best efforts because the arriving players lock them in.

    And most of those lots of times, guys have put themselves on the wrong side and get locked in by arriving players. How can they avoid getting locked in? Don't get on the wrong side!

    It happens very occasionally that players are genuinely in the way through no fault of their own and it's probably the one thing refs get right most often.

    I was moaning about one last week though 😬

    CrucialC 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • Dan54D Offline
    Dan54D Offline
    Dan54
    replied to Kiap on last edited by
    #145

    @kiap said in Super Rugby Trans Ta$man:

    @derpus said in Super Rugby Trans Ta$man:

    @kirwan its not, hence my preference for a domestic comp. P'raps its a pipedream.

    I suspect we will get a domestic comp next year. As Reds boss Jeff "Ginge" Miller said this week, all oz franchises want it.

    McClellan has good spidey senses and does read the tea leaves -- even if the sheepish Marinos does not.

    Of course, that's not going to be to the exclusion of a combined ANZ comp - but what that is ain't exactly clear ...

    Mate as I keep saying a 5 team comp will only last for another year or so before it gets to same ol same ol, with not enough variety, reckon both Aus and NZ could have good seperate comps with 7-8 teams in each comp. I would love 2 x 8 team comps, then just a top4 and bottom 4 from each comp play off, but there not enough money to do it.

    KiapK 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • CrucialC Offline
    CrucialC Offline
    Crucial
    replied to Bones on last edited by
    #146

    @bones said in Super Rugby Trans Ta$man:

    @kev said in Super Rugby Trans Ta$man:

    But lots of times guys can’t move despite best efforts because the arriving players lock them in.

    And most of those lots of times, guys have put themselves on the wrong side and get locked in by arriving players. How can they avoid getting locked in? Don't get on the wrong side!

    It happens very occasionally that players are genuinely in the way through no fault of their own and it's probably the one thing refs get right most often.

    I was moaning about one last week though 😬

    What you want though is consistency.
    I could find easily a dozen examples during the game of players on the wrong side that weren’t penalised because they didn’t affect play, yet this one does.
    I think I mentioned it in the match thread that the danger with refs like this one is that when playing advantage (or after a warning) they change the standard by which they judge.
    The guy’s method was play advantage for a technical penalty then focus on the offending side looking for any minor transgression and keep racking up the penalties until producing a YC.
    Another example of a minor infringement that caused a chain was DMac defending the line with his fingers in the field of play. Correct technical penalty that started a mindset of looking for a reason to YC.

    BonesB 1 Reply Last reply
    1

Super Rugby Trans Tasman
Sports Talk
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.