SRA: Final. Crusaders vs Chiefs
-
@act-crusader said in SRA: Final. Crusaders vs Chiefs:
@gt12 said in SRA: Final. Crusaders vs Chiefs:
Imagine what this Chief’s team might be like if it had a functioning line out?
More opportunities to throw intercepts?
They count as try assists in the stats, right?
-
@act-crusader said in SRA: Final. Crusaders vs Chiefs:
@gt12 said in SRA: Final. Crusaders vs Chiefs:
Imagine what this Chief’s team might be like if it had a functioning line out?
More opportunities to throw intercepts?
If take that rather than giving it to you at the line out.
-
Bloody entertaining game so far.
-
@kev said in SRA: Final. Crusaders vs Chiefs:
Why wasn’t the scrum a penalty?
Chiefs front row all up and Saders scrum going forward.
-
@anonymous said in SRA: Final. Crusaders vs Chiefs:
Penalty try surely for that head contact, right?
I don't know how they can justify it not being. That's a bit weird. It is the crusaders I guess...
-
Havili read that brilliantly.
-
Brilliant maul defence and then Havili in quickly to wrap it up.
-
@kiwimurph said in SRA: Final. Crusaders vs Chiefs:
Why the fuck do teams try and maul vs Crusaders close to the line?
Why why why.
They were probably too shocked that they actually won a fucking line out
-
@bones said in SRA: Final. Crusaders vs Chiefs:
@anonymous said in SRA: Final. Crusaders vs Chiefs:
Penalty try surely for that head contact, right?
I don't know how they can justify it not being. That's a bit weird. It is the crusaders I guess...
Sorry, you can only get penalty tries from scrums. Foul play is far less serious that a prop slipping over