• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

SRA Round 10: Blues v Chiefs

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Rugby Matches
blueschiefs
485 Posts 52 Posters 25.0k Views
SRA Round 10: Blues v Chiefs
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • YeetyaahY Offline
    YeetyaahY Offline
    Yeetyaah
    wrote on last edited by
    #114

    On the line

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • M Offline
    M Offline
    Machpants
    wrote on last edited by
    #115

    And the blues offer a huge gap, defence rather average

    KiwiMurphK 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • gt12G Offline
    gt12G Offline
    gt12
    wrote on last edited by
    #116

    Sullivan might not be that slow.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • StargazerS Offline
    StargazerS Offline
    Stargazer
    wrote on last edited by
    #117

    Ball was on the line. Grounding is good.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurph
    replied to Machpants on last edited by
    #118

    @machpants said in SRA Round 10: Blues v Chiefs:

    And the blues offer a huge gap, defence rather average

    Zero pillar defence.

    M 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • BonesB Offline
    BonesB Offline
    Bones
    wrote on last edited by
    #119

    Tackled player gets up again. So much for stamping it out last season.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • DonsteppaD Offline
    DonsteppaD Offline
    Donsteppa
    wrote on last edited by Donsteppa
    #120

    Very poor defence from the Chiefs. Shame we don’t have Eklund in our squad instead of Nathan Harris. (This finally posted after several of the “Forbidden” errors)

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • M Offline
    M Offline
    Machpants
    replied to KiwiMurph on last edited by
    #121

    @kiwimurph said in SRA Round 10: Blues v Chiefs:

    @machpants said in SRA Round 10: Blues v Chiefs:

    And the blues offer a huge gap, defence rather average

    Zero pillar defence.

    Like the ABs for a fair few years

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • YeetyaahY Offline
    YeetyaahY Offline
    Yeetyaah
    wrote on last edited by
    #122

    No way he's held, fucking bullshit

    BonesB 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurph
    wrote on last edited by
    #123

    Fraser is so bad.

    1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • gt12G Offline
    gt12G Offline
    gt12
    wrote on last edited by
    #124

    I think that’s fair enough, two dynamic movements there

    YeetyaahY 1 Reply Last reply
    4
  • YeetyaahY Offline
    YeetyaahY Offline
    Yeetyaah
    replied to gt12 on last edited by
    #125

    @gt12 yeah there was 2 movements, but he wasn't held so it's irrelevant

    gt12G 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • ToddyT Offline
    ToddyT Offline
    Toddy
    wrote on last edited by
    #126

    He's clearly held. His knee is on the ground while the Blues players have hold of him.

    1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • gt12G Offline
    gt12G Offline
    gt12
    replied to Yeetyaah on last edited by
    #127

    @yeetyaah said in SRA Round 10: Blues v Chiefs:

    @gt12 yeah there was 2 movements, but he wasn't held so it's irrelevant

    If you call the first one dynamic movement, he cant place it the second time (is my read at least)

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • BonesB Offline
    BonesB Offline
    Bones
    replied to Yeetyaah on last edited by
    #128

    @yeetyaah said in SRA Round 10: Blues v Chiefs:

    No way he's held, fucking bullshit

    You don't think he was tackled? It's pretty fucken simple - can't hold the player on the ground, tackler must release. If that's the rules then tackles like that must be called correctly.

    Or would you rather players having to hold the player on the ground?

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • ChrisC Offline
    ChrisC Offline
    Chris
    wrote on last edited by Chris
    #129

    FFS Fraser you prodantic prick

    BonesB 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • M Offline
    M Offline
    Machpants
    wrote on last edited by
    #130

    Little half back pile driving huge lock, lol

    A antipodeanA 2 Replies Last reply
    1
  • gt12G Offline
    gt12G Offline
    gt12
    wrote on last edited by
    #131

    What?

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • S Offline
    S Offline
    Steven Harris
    wrote on last edited by
    #132

    The Blues breakdown work is very average ..Chiefs who met in the car park on Tuesday doing well ..

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • BonesB Offline
    BonesB Offline
    Bones
    replied to Chris on last edited by
    #133

    @chris said in SRA Round 10: Blues v Chiefs:

    FFS Fraser you prodantic prick

    So close

    ChrisC 1 Reply Last reply
    0

SRA Round 10: Blues v Chiefs
Rugby Matches
blueschiefs
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.