SRA round 8: Chiefs v Crusaders

[taniwharugby]

Is the captains challenge an IRB directive or just NZ (or are Aus using it too)

[gt12]

You’re fucking lucky Nankivell

[Chris B.]

Doesn't it have to be foul play to be referred for anything other than a try?

That's not foul play!!!

That's fuck all!!!

[Anonymous]

@chris-b said in SRA round 8: Chiefs v Crusaders:

Doesn't it have to be foul play to be referred for anything other than a try?

That's not foul play!!!

That's fuck all!!!

Obstruction is foul play. It's in the foul play section of the laws

[gt12]

You have to exit, giving these easy points to the Saders is a killer

[Bones]

@chris-b said in SRA round 8: Chiefs v Crusaders:

Doesn't it have to be foul play to be referred for anything other than a try?

That's not foul play!!!

That's fuck all!!!

Tell me how that punchable face that Strange is sporting isn't foul play.

[gt12]

What a brilliant exit by the Saders. Fuck they’re good. Back in our half so easily.

[Mattasaurus]

Well taken try. Chiefs need to up the intensity and urgency on defence. Letting Mounga run like that is just stoopid

[Bones]

@gt12 said in SRA round 8: Chiefs v Crusaders:

What a brilliant exit by the Saders. Fuck they’re good. Back in our half so easily.

Slick eh! The blindside flanker looks handy... good pace...

[gt12]

Too easy. Chiefs defenders were literally looking at each other. No urgency.

[Canerbry]

Accuracy seems a bit off for the Crusaders, Mo is missing the timing for some hard runners a bit. A small adjustment and they'll take this Chiefs team apart later in the game.

[gt12]

If we had a tight five / front 8 that could lay any platform, we might be in this, but we just cant match up. We’re too small, cant exit, and when we are dominant (eg scrums) we dont get any reward

[Bones]

I liked that angle from behind. As soon as Mounga stepped in and created that gap, you could see Jordan realise and straighten inside his defender, stepping on the gas.

[gt12]

What? He was never through the gate.

[Mattasaurus]

Pretty sure that's the 1st time in 2021 the saders have not conceded repetitive infringements when in their red zone 😁

[Bones]

@mattasaurus said in SRA round 8: Chiefs v Crusaders:

Pretty sure that's the 1st time in 2021 the saders have not conceded repetitive infringements when in their red zone 😁

They didn't get a chance to!

[gt12]

Get Nankivell off.

[antipodean]

@gt12 said in SRA round 8: Chiefs v Crusaders:

Get Nankivell off.

Any worse than Webber's passing or DMac running sideways and shovelling the ball?

[Anonymous]

I really don't understand how you're planning of winning a turnover when one of your arms has a player between it and the ball

[ACT Crusader]

Not a bad half from the underdog Saders.