Crusaders v Chiefs
-
@kiwimurph don't think the Weber decision was so bad, but it was the end result of very poor calls prior, that should have seen him not carded.
-
@crazy-horse said in Crusaders v Chiefs:
@kiwimurph said in Crusaders v Chiefs:
@gunner essentially what seemed to happen was the TMO made a quick call from one viewing/angle when in fact the second angle clearly showed what happened.
And yet we have a chorus of people saying speed the decisions up. Even during this thread. Fuck being an official, they can't bloody win.
Oh come on, that was hardly speeding it up, it was lazy incompetence. He didn't even wait to watch a second angle.
-
@crazy-horse said in Crusaders v Chiefs:
So, did anybody else see the jersey pull or did I imagine it?
Hah I think you imagined it fella! On who?
-
@bones said in Crusaders v Chiefs:
@crazy-horse said in Crusaders v Chiefs:
So, did anybody else see the jersey pull or did I imagine it?
Hah I think you imagined it fella! On who?
Dunno, haven't watched the replay. Whomever (whoever?) was outside Mo'unga at the time. Might take a look tomorrow. I'll be sure to let you know, even if I am mistaken 😀
-
@crazy-horse why bother pulling the jersey of a player outside Mounga if Mounga is just gonna run him out if room anyway? 😁
-
@taniwharugby said in Crusaders v Chiefs:
@kiwimurph don't think the Weber decision was so bad, but it was the end result of very poor calls prior, that should have seen him not carded.
I'm talking about the tackle on Mounga not the card.
-
@bones being the spastic, I couldn't sleep until I had proven some random polish chick wrong on the internet, so I looked at the replay. It looks like it is Stevenson pulling the jumper of the Crusaders 6 as Mo'unga makes the break. Slows the 6 down a bit. I don't think Mo'unga was ever going to pass him the ball but who knows. Not a biggie, but I have seen plenty of penalties come from similar plays before. Glad I didnt imagine it after all!
-
@crazy-horse forward pass makes it irrelevant though right? 😬
-
-
@nta said in Crusaders v Chiefs:
Just saw that Crusaders "try" to the winger.
Wow.
Sure, the Crusaders were probably too good (haven't seen the game), but fuck you understand where the reputation of being favoured comes from.
Is that the first one where Faiunga'anuku might have dragged his foot on the grass? Was ok with that ss it wasn't "clear and obvious,".
-
@booboo said in Crusaders v Chiefs:
@nta said in Crusaders v Chiefs:
Just saw that Crusaders "try" to the winger.
Wow.
Sure, the Crusaders were probably too good (haven't seen the game), but fuck you understand where the reputation of being favoured comes from.
Is that the first one where Faiunga'anuku might have dragged his foot on the grass? Was ok with that ss it wasn't "clear and obvious,".
On my screen it clearly looked like his foot hit the ground and bounced back. On both angles.
-
@bones said in Crusaders v Chiefs:
That's a clear foot on the ground.
Marshall and TJ pulling on about woderful try which wasn't.
For me 95% certain toe touched ground. No clear evidience of being out, surely doen't mean 100%? So 99% is not clear.
BULLSHIT.
Wht do NZ refs get tipsy when reffing Chch???
-
@pakman said in Crusaders v Chiefs:
@bones said in Crusaders v Chiefs:
That's a clear foot on the ground.
Marshall and TJ pulling on about woderful try which wasn't.
For me 95% certain toe touched ground. No clear evidience of being out, surely doen't mean 100%? So 99% is not clear.
BULLSHIT.
Wht do NZ refs get tipsy when reffing Chch???
Then another try that wasn't and Weber wrongly in the bin for ten, during which Chch get soft try.
After 50 we ought to have had a contest to watch.
Relentless this, relentless that, the only relentless thing was the commentary circle jerk.
-
-
@mofitzy_ said in Crusaders v Chiefs:
Call me crazy as a Chiefs fan but I would give him the benefit of the doubt. If you aren't 100% sure he grazed a blade of grass then give him the try. It didn't bounce of the ground IMO, just possibly touched grass.
I'm 100%
-
@bones said in Crusaders v Chiefs:
@mofitzy_ said in Crusaders v Chiefs:
Call me crazy as a Chiefs fan but I would give him the benefit of the doubt. If you aren't 100% sure he grazed a blade of grass then give him the try. It didn't bounce of the ground IMO, just possibly touched grass.
I'm 100%
The protocol needs review. Perhaps ref should have said that grounding was good but not sure of touch. Was it on balance of probabilities alright?
NO TRY.
-
@pakman said in Crusaders v Chiefs:
@bones said in Crusaders v Chiefs:
@mofitzy_ said in Crusaders v Chiefs:
Call me crazy as a Chiefs fan but I would give him the benefit of the doubt. If you aren't 100% sure he grazed a blade of grass then give him the try. It didn't bounce of the ground IMO, just possibly touched grass.
I'm 100%
The protocol needs review. Perhaps ref should have said that grounding was good but not sure of touch. Was it on balance of probabilities alright?
NO TRY.
Can't say I like the sound of that. Whose probabilities?
His foot hit the ground, the protocol doesn't need reviewing.
