Crusaders v Chiefs
-
@african-monkey No.
-
@african-monkey said in Crusaders v Chiefs:
@dice Was he ever a good scrummager?
Thought there was a period there around 2019 where he was coming good.
-
@african-monkey He was a lot better before the injury.
-
@african-monkey He had his moments, but not at test level.
-
@bones but thats always the case, and the benefit of being the attacking team, you control the maul.
-
@anonymous or the maul going backwards is seen as ok.
-
@tim said in Crusaders v Chiefs:
@anonymous I hate the two-goes at going forward rule too. If you stop going forward why should you get another go?
You're only supposed to if it stops for less than 5 seconds the first time. I'm not entirely convinced that's how it is officiated in practice.
-
@taniwharugby said in Crusaders v Chiefs:
@bones but thats always the case, and the benefit of being the attacking team, you control the maul.
How often do you hear a ref say a team has taken a maul down and not penalise them?
-
@african-monkey Huge goof to take him instead of Karl T, forcing Ofa T to cover loosehead off the bench. Karl T missed most of Super Rugby with meningitis, but got back into good condition and was in huge form for North Harbour.
-
Just realised Stevenson was playing. How come nobody told me?
-
That was a shit call for the Webber binning. But fuck we are good. So well drilled.
-
@crazy-horse said in Crusaders v Chiefs:
Just realised Stevenson was playing. How come nobody told me?
We were trying to hide him on defence...
-
@bones I've heard if often, but is clarifying it was taken down by the attacking team so no penalty?
-
@chchfanatic said in Crusaders v Chiefs:
That was a shit call for the Webber binning. But fuck we are good. So well drilled.
You're certainly good at taking your opportunities ... no matter how they're handed to you.
-
To be honest despite the decisions , there is daylight between these 2 teams in terms of most facets .., you could give the chiefs a 20 point head start and would still back the Saders ..
