• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

Aussie Cricket

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
cricket
2.0k Posts 69 Posters 396.0k Views
Aussie Cricket
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • NTAN Offline
    NTAN Offline
    NTA
    replied to KiwiMurph on last edited by
    #1897

    @KiwiMurph said in Aussie Cricket:

    This is what happens when the Black Caps don't play lose for 3 more weeks games.

    Fixed.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • MN5M Offline
    MN5M Offline
    MN5
    replied to booboo on last edited by MN5
    #1898

    @booboo said in Aussie Cricket:

    @MN5 said in Aussie Cricket:

    The underarm incident was a boring, overblown non event 40 years ago.

    How people still feel the need to wank on about it to this day is completely beyond me.

    Genuine question. How old were you when it happened?

    And it's always good to remind Aussies of their shameful acts.

    Look, it was a bit of a fluffybunny thing to do but the Chappells are no Brad Haddins

    boobooB 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • G Offline
    G Offline
    Gunner
    wrote on last edited by
    #1899

    https://www.espncricinfo.com/story/australia-call-off-south-africa-tour-because-of-unacceptable-covid-19-risk-1249841?fbclid=IwAR2z1wcYMVxUe2oMUKbtbo2HU0ZFJRQpV8-d00qfxxvNHFtfw8aFlIweGqw

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • J Offline
    J Offline
    junior
    replied to barbarian on last edited by
    #1900

    @barbarian said in Aussie Cricket:

    I've always been a bit perplexed by underarm. It still resonates so strongly, and yet what Australia did was entirely legal at the time. It seems to be the 80s equivalent to Sandpapergate, and yet they are completely different situations with only one actually outside the rules of the game.

    I don't agree with the decision to bowl underarm, but still to be talking about it 40 years later?

    Give us a break, will you? We're reminded of body line every Ashes series, FFS!

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • boobooB Do not disturb
    boobooB Do not disturb
    booboo
    replied to MN5 on last edited by
    #1901

    @MN5 said in Aussie Cricket:

    @booboo said in Aussie Cricket:

    @MN5 said in Aussie Cricket:

    The underarm incident was a boring, overblown non event 40 years ago.

    How people still feel the need to wank on about it to this day is completely beyond me.

    Genuine question. How old were you when it happened?

    And it's always good to remind Aussies of their shameful acts.

    Look, it was a bit of a fluffybunny thing to do but the Chappells are no Brad Haddins

    Brad Haddin comes across as a choir boy compared to the Chappells. Which demonstrates just how seriously the underarm was taken.

    MN5M 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • BovidaeB Offline
    BovidaeB Offline
    Bovidae
    wrote on last edited by Bovidae
    #1902

    With the SA tour now postponed will there be a revised T20 squad touring NZ?

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • MN5M Offline
    MN5M Offline
    MN5
    replied to booboo on last edited by
    #1903

    @booboo said in Aussie Cricket:

    @MN5 said in Aussie Cricket:

    @booboo said in Aussie Cricket:

    @MN5 said in Aussie Cricket:

    The underarm incident was a boring, overblown non event 40 years ago.

    How people still feel the need to wank on about it to this day is completely beyond me.

    Genuine question. How old were you when it happened?

    And it's always good to remind Aussies of their shameful acts.

    Look, it was a bit of a fluffybunny thing to do but the Chappells are no Brad Haddins

    Brad Haddin comes across as a choir boy compared to the Chappells. Which demonstrates just how seriously the underarm was taken.

    No he doesn’t. He’s universally loathed whereas Greg Chappell is a legend who did something dumb once

    SnowyS boobooB 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • SnowyS Offline
    SnowyS Offline
    Snowy
    replied to MN5 on last edited by
    #1904

    @MN5 said in Aussie Cricket:

    @booboo said in Aussie Cricket:

    @MN5 said in Aussie Cricket:

    @booboo said in Aussie Cricket:

    @MN5 said in Aussie Cricket:

    The underarm incident was a boring, overblown non event 40 years ago.

    How people still feel the need to wank on about it to this day is completely beyond me.

    Genuine question. How old were you when it happened?

    And it's always good to remind Aussies of their shameful acts.

    Look, it was a bit of a fluffybunny thing to do but the Chappells are no Brad Haddins

    Brad Haddin comes across as a choir boy compared to the Chappells. Which demonstrates just how seriously the underarm was taken.

    No he doesn’t. He’s universally loathed whereas Greg Chappell is a legend who did something dumb once

    Which of these turds looks more appealing?

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • dogmeatD Offline
    dogmeatD Offline
    dogmeat
    wrote on last edited by
    #1905

    Unlike most posters I was an adult when the underarm incident took place, albeit living on the other side of the world.

    I too was incensed (& amused) at the time, but I do think the whole thing gets rolled out way too often.

    the Snedden catch was far more rage inducing but has been largely forgotten.

    Aussie cricketers cheat, Aussie umpires are fluffybunnies. the sun rises in the east. Move on.

    I look at it as a coming of age for NZ cricket and a fantastic outcome for us. So rattled were the Aussies that they had to come up with this venal act. All the smug condescension from Australian cricket died that day. A great result for us. Bowl a legal delivery and we lose. Even if we win it's forgotten in a few years. Show as piggy said that the colour of the jersey reflects your inner fortitude. Priceless.

    SnowyS 1 Reply Last reply
    4
  • boobooB Do not disturb
    boobooB Do not disturb
    booboo
    replied to MN5 on last edited by
    #1906

    @MN5 said in Aussie Cricket:

    @booboo said in Aussie Cricket:

    @MN5 said in Aussie Cricket:

    @booboo said in Aussie Cricket:

    @MN5 said in Aussie Cricket:

    The underarm incident was a boring, overblown non event 40 years ago.

    How people still feel the need to wank on about it to this day is completely beyond me.

    Genuine question. How old were you when it happened?

    And it's always good to remind Aussies of their shameful acts.

    Look, it was a bit of a fluffybunny thing to do but the Chappells are no Brad Haddins

    Brad Haddin comes across as a choir boy compared to the Chappells. Which demonstrates just how seriously the underarm was taken.

    No he doesn’t. He’s universally loathed whereas Greg Chappell is a legend who did something dumb once

    So serious

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • SnowyS Offline
    SnowyS Offline
    Snowy
    replied to dogmeat on last edited by
    #1907

    @dogmeat said in Aussie Cricket:

    the Snedden catch was far more rage inducing but has been largely forgotten.

    Not around here it hasn't.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • BovidaeB Offline
    BovidaeB Offline
    Bovidae
    wrote on last edited by
    #1908

    And poor old Bruce Edgar gets completely forgotten being unbeaten on 102 at the non-strikers end.

    SnowyS 1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • SnowyS Offline
    SnowyS Offline
    Snowy
    replied to Bovidae on last edited by
    #1909

    @Bovidae said in Aussie Cricket:

    And poor old Bruce Edgar gets completely forgotten being unbeaten on 102 at the non-strikers end.

    Not completely. IIRC it was a rather slow 102 that lead to us needing a six of the last ball...

    Given that he opened and it was the last ball, and he was on 102, his strike rate wasn't great.

    BovidaeB SiamS 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • BovidaeB Offline
    BovidaeB Offline
    Bovidae
    replied to Snowy on last edited by
    #1910

    @Snowy Edgar was at the other end for the entire last over. Strike rate was much lower back then.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • SiamS Offline
    SiamS Offline
    Siam
    replied to Snowy on last edited by
    #1911

    @Snowy mentioned before but in 1992 I was in a flat in dunners coincidentally watching a replay with Lance Cairns, ( he was waiting for a 22 year old Christopher to come back after a night out and our flat was the rendezvous- never saw chris and lance left after an hour😄).
    His summarion of all the drama and the game was, "we'd have won but for Edgar's glacial innings"

    Ps. I don't think he said glacial but you get the point🙂

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • MN5M Offline
    MN5M Offline
    MN5
    wrote on last edited by
    #1912

    So assuming he faced about half the deliveries then yeah 102 is possibly a tad slow off 150 balls even for and ODI in the early 80s....

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • BovidaeB Offline
    BovidaeB Offline
    Bovidae
    wrote on last edited by
    #1913

    Edgar's strike rate was 72.34 (102 off 141 balls) compared to Wright's 51.85 (42 off 81 balls).

    Edgar also had a 99* against India in an ODI so that was his only ODI century.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • MN5M Offline
    MN5M Offline
    MN5
    wrote on last edited by
    #1914

    D246BF55-E87A-4669-B565-B2E59677FC24.jpeg

    1 Reply Last reply
    8
  • SiamS Offline
    SiamS Offline
    Siam
    wrote on last edited by Siam
    #1915

    BBL

    Cricket Australia is clown world again.

    Steve Smith not allowed to play for sixers in final because rules are rules.

    Sixers captain Moises Henriques says the ruling defies CA's desire for the BBL to feature the best Australian players.

    "You have got a former Australian captain, one of the best players in the world," Henriques told reporters on Friday. "You have got IPL teams who pay multi-million dollars just to have this guy as part of their franchise. Advertising, bums on seats, eyes on TV's - I mean, you do the math.

    "And we're saying no because of a rule that is two weeks old in some Covid bubble hub. To me, I don't get it. We're in the top two without him ... so I have got absolute belief in our domestic talent and local talent to do the job. I think it's sad for cricket, that's all."

    Henriques understood "how those mistakes were made initially two weeks ago" when drawing up the replacement player rules.

    NTAN 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • NTAN Offline
    NTAN Offline
    NTA
    replied to Siam on last edited by
    #1916

    @siam said in Aussie Cricket:

    We're in the top two without him

    Which is a good point.

    The rules are shit, but are you displacing a guy who helped get you into the top 2 for Steve Smith? I reckon opinion would be divided.

    SiamS 1 Reply Last reply
    0

Aussie Cricket
Sports Talk
cricket
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.