Bledisloe Four: Brisbane, 7 November
-
@taniwharugby said in Bledisloe Four: Brisbane, 7 November:
@pakman man in front of the kicker at restarts has been a thing for years now...seems officials let some of those things go now, similarly hookers with thier feet over the sideline at lineouts
Had it been a penalty which went over, should the TMO have pointed out to ref that men were in front?
-
@Nepia said in Bledisloe Four: Brisbane, 7 November:
@Kiwiwomble said in Bledisloe Four: Brisbane, 7 November:
@Nepia said in Bledisloe Four: Brisbane, 7 November:
@Kiwiwomble said in Bledisloe Four: Brisbane, 7 November:
@Machpants I don’t think it’s just mine, I think serval had said he deserves it
I guess my starting point is deliberate things, and yes sometimes it’s hard to tell, but deliberate things should cop a harsher penalty
Scott of the Barrett's deliberately interfered with the ball, while on the ground at a ruck. Deliberate professional foul so the ref was correct to yellow card him. There's no law in rugby that says teams have to be warned before being given a yellow card.
@Machpants I think if you look back through games you'll find similar stupid incidents like this getting yellow cards.
agreed, thats what ive been saying, i was fine with barrets one
Oh apologies, I must have got your posts confused with someone else. I'm an idiot like Scott.
You’re not quite that bad.
-
@pakman said in Bledisloe Four: Brisbane, 7 November:
@taniwharugby said in Bledisloe Four: Brisbane, 7 November:
@pakman man in front of the kicker at restarts has been a thing for years now...seems officials let some of those things go now, similarly hookers with thier feet over the sideline at lineouts
Had it been a penalty which went over, should the TMO have pointed out to ref that men were in front?
No, that would be ridiculous. As with any offside, the referee should interpret if it had any impact on the play itself. Clearly in this instance it did not.
Had the ball clattered off the post and Hooper regained the ball or made a covering tackle then it's definitely a penalty though.
-
@taniwharugby said in Bledisloe Four: Brisbane, 7 November:
that extra inch makes all the difference...
That's why she married me...both inches matter.
I actually haven't seen too many where the hooker has both feet inside the chalk without some part of a foot touching it recently. AR's should be all over that, not straights and off side. Not that difficult from the sideline.
-
Four weeks for Swinton
SANZAAR confirm Swinton ban following controversial red card against All Blacks
The flanker was red-carded by referee Nic Berry 34 minutes into his Test debut during the fourth and final Bledisloe Test in Brisbane.
-
they cant even get the real simple stuff right
-
@Kiwiwomble said in Bledisloe Four: Brisbane, 7 November:
they cant even get the real simple stuff right
It does seem like a holiday job.
"Just show up, you'll be fine"
-
@Kiwiwomble maybe Gardner has colour blindness to pink?
-
@taniwharugby said in Bledisloe Four: Brisbane, 7 November:
@Kiwiwomble maybe Gardner has colour blindness to pink?
And white.
-
@Snowy a ref with green/white colour blindness
-
@Kiwiwomble said in Bledisloe Four: Brisbane, 7 November:
@Snowy a ref with green/white colour blindness
They're all the same. Can't see a white seven on black I've been told.
Should've gone to spec savers.
-
@Snowy said in Bledisloe Four: Brisbane, 7 November:
@Kiwiwomble said in Bledisloe Four: Brisbane, 7 November:
@Snowy a ref with green/white colour blindness
They're all the same. Can't see a white seven on black I've been told.
Should've gone to spec savers.
You should be a test rugby ref!
-
@Machpants Seems reasonable. I don't know what's controversial about it. He managed to shoulder charge a lock on the chin.
-
@antipodean it is a big chin.
But yeah - four week is about right.
No idea why we're doing this on the Bledisloe 3 thread. Maybe he hit him into last week?
-
@taniwharugby said in Bledisloe Four: Brisbane, 7 November:
Funny article...
The fact that he singles out Cully, JK, Kearns and Horan, yet barely Marshalls comment is more a passing comment
And he called JK and Cully decent blokes but not Kearns and Horan. Probably a stupid question but if they were such serious head contacts shouldn’t have the players hit been sent for HIAs?
