The Cane vs Savea Debate
-
@shark said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:
@mofitzy_ So you're saying it's the openside flankers' role to provide all that physicality?
No, it's everyones. This argument that if we have a hard hitting 6 then we can afford to carry someone who is passive in the loose forwards is ridiculous. Test rugby against good opposition is trench warfare and every opportunity we get to stop their forward progress so they give us the ball back needs to be taken.
Cane is a better openside flanker in the mould of McCaw. He reads the game better than other flankers, he gets involved more than other flankers and his involvements matter.
-
@antipodean said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:
This argument that if we have a hard hitting 6 then we can afford to carry someone who is passive in the loose forwards is ridiculous.
not sure thats what people are saying?
We have seen the discussions here many times before where there is making tackles and dominant tackles, both have thier place, your 7 if he is playing for t/os isnt gonna go hunting for the big hits
-
-
@taniwharugby said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:
@antipodean said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:
This argument that if we have a hard hitting 6 then we can afford to carry someone who is passive in the loose forwards is ridiculous.
not sure thats what people are saying?
We have seen the discussions here many times before where there is making tackles and dominant tackles, both have thier place, your 7 if he is playing for t/os isnt gonna go hunting for the big hits
So you end up with a flanker like Cockwomble. If your support and cleanout is on the job, his entire game is nullified and you're making yards.
There are far too many people who watch SR and think that translates to Tests.
-
@Machpants said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:
And Ardie is in no way passive. His hits are more often dominant than cane in SRA
Nonsense.
-
@antipodean said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:
So you end up with a flanker like Cockwomble.
yes...which to me isnt how we play, more so when you look at how easily nullified he can be
-
@taniwharugby said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:
@antipodean said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:
This argument that if we have a hard hitting 6 then we can afford to carry someone who is passive in the loose forwards is ridiculous.
not sure thats what people are saying?
We have seen the discussions here many times before where there is making tackles and dominant tackles, both have thier place, your 7 if he is playing for t/os isnt gonna go hunting for the big hits
I think some are confusing the 7 jersey with Pocockwomble.
McCaw wasn't an out and out jackler and that's what made him great. He got stuck into being among the first to the breakdown via excellent running lines, then being a nuisance once there or cleaning out for quick re-cycling.
The likes of Boshier are still trying to balance their game out in this regard.He can turn on the jackling at critical times but looks more to being first to the breakdown or making the tackle.I think both Cane and Ardie are also not quite there on that perfect balance but in different aspects.
-
@antipodean said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:
@taniwharugby said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:
@antipodean said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:
This argument that if we have a hard hitting 6 then we can afford to carry someone who is passive in the loose forwards is ridiculous.
not sure thats what people are saying?
We have seen the discussions here many times before where there is making tackles and dominant tackles, both have thier place, your 7 if he is playing for t/os isnt gonna go hunting for the big hits
So you end up with a flanker like Cockwomble. If your support and cleanout is on the job, his entire game is nullified and you're making yards.
There are far too many people who watch SR and think that translates to Tests.
thats offensive to my people
-
@Machpants said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:
And Ardie is in no way passive. His hits are more often dominant than cane in SRA
I'd like to know how they classified a dominant tackle.
Mitchell Brown was second but I don't remember him smashing players in the tackle either.
-
@Kiwiwomble said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:
@antipodean said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:
@taniwharugby said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:
@antipodean said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:
This argument that if we have a hard hitting 6 then we can afford to carry someone who is passive in the loose forwards is ridiculous.
not sure thats what people are saying?
We have seen the discussions here many times before where there is making tackles and dominant tackles, both have thier place, your 7 if he is playing for t/os isnt gonna go hunting for the big hits
So you end up with a flanker like Cockwomble. If your support and cleanout is on the job, his entire game is nullified and you're making yards.
There are far too many people who watch SR and think that translates to Tests.
thats offensive to my people
I thought Kiwi was your Iwi. Womble just your designation?
-
@Bovidae said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:
I'd like to know how they classified a dominant tackle.
Wayne Smith did an interview or was in an article several years back about what they deem a tackle vs a dominant one, I dont think it will be in our archives here.
If he said, it is FACT
-
@antipodean said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:
@Machpants said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:
And Ardie is in no way passive. His hits are more often dominant than cane in SRA
Nonsense.
Whelp, that's what the stats said.
Cane's Super Rugby Aotearoa stats show that he has made the third-most tackles in the competition, behind fellow open sides Dalton Papalii and Dillon Hunt, despite sitting out the opening two rounds.
He is making dominant tackles at a solid rate of 19%, but that sits below other loose forwards Ardie Savea (31%), Mitch Brown (28%), Papalii (25%), Du'Plessis Kirifi (25%), and Tom Christie (25%).
-
@Machpants said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:
@antipodean said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:
@Machpants said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:
And Ardie is in no way passive. His hits are more often dominant than cane in SRA
Nonsense.
Whelp, that's what the stats said.
Cane's Super Rugby Aotearoa stats show that he has made the third-most tackles in the competition, behind fellow open sides Dalton Papalii and Dillon Hunt, despite sitting out the opening two rounds.
He is making dominant tackles at a solid rate of 19%, but that sits below other loose forwards Ardie Savea (31%), Mitch Brown (28%), Papalii (25%), Du'Plessis Kirifi (25%), and Tom Christie (25%).
Whose stats are those, Helen fucking Kellers? Not even Ardie's mum thinks he makes dominant tackles a third of the time.
-
@antipodean you didn't watch SRA then, he was fkn massive for the canes. He was smashing people back. Cane was doing the work in the background stuff, never really noticed him. Sure he hit lots of tackles (losing team, duh) but apart from that not much. Also f all leadership in said losing team.
EDIT: Rugbypass, owned by sky, stats BTW
Rugby Journalists, Writers & Contributors | RugbyPass
Read more about our contributors. Find out what makes them tick and why they love Rugby so much. Get to know us here.
-
@Machpants said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:
@antipodean you didn't watch SRA then, he was fkn massive for the canes. He was smashing people back.
Yeah righto Mrs Savea.
EDIT: Rugbypass, owned by sky, stats BTW
Rugby Journalists, Writers & Contributors | RugbyPass
Read more about our contributors. Find out what makes them tick and why they love Rugby so much. Get to know us here.
Clearly none of them have a quality dictionary judging by their definition of dominant.
-
@Machpants Without going into the Cane vs Savea discussion, the stats from Rugbypass are usually not very good. Opta/SANZAAR stats (not sure whether SANZAAR stats come from Opta) are the best, closely followed by ESPN. Fox Sports stats are somewhere in-between Opta/ESPN and Rugbypass.
-
@Stargazer and none of those watch the match and note dominant tackles, so the point is moot. Cane was, outside of defensive work rate due to leading a pile of arse team, anon in SRA. Ardie, after a quiet start, was impressive in offense and defence. I agree with those stats.
Doesn't mean he's better when they are both on form, or better in test matches. But cane had not looked good this year, whereas Ardie has in patches, along with being one of our best players for ages (as voted by his fellow ABs). So I'll believe rugby pass stats, and I also think foster was stupid naming cane as Captain so early when he is not our best in that position. It's like hooper too me.
Cane will do the job, Ardie will do it better.
So GFY Harriet
-
@Machpants said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:
So GFY Harriet
It's Catherine Everett .
I'm firmly in teh Cane camp. Our style is that we don't need the turnover merchant, but a physically dominant and effective player. Cane rocks that for me. Savea is great in his own way, but just not as physically dominant.
Simply put, Cane kills people in the tackle, and in Test rugby, that's what you need. That's also needed from 6+8, but Savea is one of those players who just doesn't fit unfortunately ...a bit short and a bit small to be long term dominant at Test level.
