• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

Aussie Pro Rugby

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
australia
5.2k Posts 136 Posters 924.0k Views
Aussie Pro Rugby
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • StargazerS Offline
    StargazerS Offline
    Stargazer
    wrote on last edited by
    #2402

    M YeetyaahY antipodeanA 3 Replies Last reply
    0
  • M Offline
    M Offline
    Machpants
    replied to Stargazer on last edited by
    #2403

    @Stargazer #desperate

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • YeetyaahY Online
    YeetyaahY Online
    Yeetyaah
    replied to Stargazer on last edited by
    #2404

    @Stargazer shit eh what a weird signing.

    BonesB boobooB 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • BonesB Offline
    BonesB Offline
    Bones
    replied to Yeetyaah on last edited by
    #2405

    @Yeetyaah why is that? It's the force.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • antipodeanA Offline
    antipodeanA Offline
    antipodean
    replied to Stargazer on last edited by
    #2406

    @Stargazer just the sort of signing to make them competitive - ageing Irish player looking for more sunshine.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • NTAN Offline
    NTAN Offline
    NTA
    wrote on last edited by
    #2407

    TWIGGYBUCKS!!!

    boobooB 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • boobooB Offline
    boobooB Offline
    booboo
    replied to Yeetyaah on last edited by
    #2408

    @Yeetyaah said in Aussie Rugby:

    @Stargazer shit eh what a weird signing.

    I don't mind it.

    Kind of intriguing.

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • boobooB Offline
    boobooB Offline
    booboo
    replied to NTA on last edited by
    #2409

    @NTA said in Aussie Rugby:

    TWIGGYBUCKS!!!

    This though.

    Not sustainable

    NTAN 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • NTAN Offline
    NTAN Offline
    NTA
    replied to booboo on last edited by
    #2410

    @booboo said in Aussie Rugby:

    @NTA said in Aussie Rugby:

    TWIGGYBUCKS!!!

    This though.

    Not sustainable

    Have a look at RA since building a $45M war chest on 2003 RWC windfall.

    Sustainable? Lolz....

    KiapK 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • KiapK Offline
    KiapK Offline
    Kiap
    replied to NTA on last edited by Kiap
    #2411

    @NTA said in Aussie Rugby:

    @booboo said in Aussie Rugby:

    @NTA said in Aussie Rugby:

    TWIGGYBUCKS!!!

    This though.

    Not sustainable

    Have a look at RA since building a $45M war chest on 2003 RWC windfall.

    Sustainable? Lolz....

    "We'll all be rooned," said Hanrahan, "before the year is out."

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • StargazerS Offline
    StargazerS Offline
    Stargazer
    wrote on last edited by
    #2412

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • NTAN Offline
    NTAN Offline
    NTA
    wrote on last edited by
    #2413

    Traveling Wilburys

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • antipodeanA Offline
    antipodeanA Offline
    antipodean
    wrote on last edited by
    #2414

    Western Force. Fixing Australia's depth by hiring one ineligible retiree at a time.

    NTAN D RapidoR 3 Replies Last reply
    5
  • NTAN Offline
    NTAN Offline
    NTA
    replied to antipodean on last edited by
    #2415

    @antipodean said in Aussie Rugby:

    Western Force. Fixing Australia's depth by hiring one ineligible retiree at a time.

    TWIGGYBUCKS FTW!

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • D Offline
    D Offline
    Derpus
    replied to antipodean on last edited by
    #2416

    @antipodean So the Force must be competitive but they must only be competitive with locally sourced players?

    They are 31 and 26 year old internationals, by the way.

    It's actually pretty hard to gauge what NZ actually want. is it competitive teams, or locally sourced talent, or is it new markets, or Pacifika team based no-where near any of it's 'locally sourced players'? flopping around like a dead fish.

    StargazerS antipodeanA 2 Replies Last reply
    5
  • StargazerS Offline
    StargazerS Offline
    Stargazer
    replied to Derpus on last edited by
    #2417

    @Derpus Don't confuse "NZ" with NZ media. Our media are almost as shit as yours.

    KiwiMurphK 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurph
    replied to Stargazer on last edited by
    #2418

    @Stargazer sounds like more of a (fair) shot at NZR to me

    StargazerS 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • antipodeanA Offline
    antipodeanA Offline
    antipodean
    replied to Derpus on last edited by antipodean
    #2419

    @Derpus said in Aussie Rugby:

    @antipodean So the Force must be competitive but they must only be competitive with locally sourced players?

    Wasn't the argument that reinstalling the Force would address Australia's depth?

    They are 31 and 26 year old internationals, by the way.

    End of their careers until they can get to Europe.

    It's actually pretty hard to gauge what NZ actually want. is it competitive teams, or locally sourced talent, or is it new markets, or Pacifika team based no-where near any of it's 'locally sourced players'? flopping around like a dead fish.

    I didn't realise I spoke for all of NZ, let alone have adopted those positions.

    D 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • StargazerS Offline
    StargazerS Offline
    Stargazer
    replied to KiwiMurph on last edited by
    #2420

    @KiwiMurph I'm not sure it's a "fair" shot at NZR. Although the way NZR have been communicating is below par, I think their considerations are pretty valid.

    KiwiMurphK 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • D Offline
    D Offline
    Derpus
    replied to antipodean on last edited by
    #2421

    @antipodean Did i say it was hard to gauge what you want?

    antipodeanA 1 Reply Last reply
    0

Aussie Pro Rugby
Sports Talk
australia
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.