Otago v Auckland
-
@Kiwiwomble said in Otago v Auckland:
@Kirwan said in Otago v Auckland:
@Kiwiwomble said in Otago v Auckland:
@Tim what more do you want, at the 8's feet over the line
Penalty advantage for all the previous infringements?
thst would be the winding up shit i was talking about
Or pointing out the penalty offenses you are ignoring?
-
@Kiwiwomble It's an interesting question as to whether it stops the try, and whether that's enough for a penalty try. Similar to the way mauls are reffed?
-
@Kirwan said in Otago v Auckland:
@Kiwiwomble said in Otago v Auckland:
@Kirwan said in Otago v Auckland:
@Kiwiwomble said in Otago v Auckland:
@Tim what more do you want, at the 8's feet over the line
Penalty advantage for all the previous infringements?
thst would be the winding up shit i was talking about
Or pointing out the penalty offenses you are ignoring?
not ignoring, not relevant, otago werent nder any scrum warnings, that scrum was still up and just walked over the line
-
@Kirwan said in Otago v Auckland:
See it can be defended
what people say about you is true, playing the innocent about winding up and then straight up doing it
-
Too me, the issue right there is Ruru,..you have dominant scrum, you take ownership ..all the forwards are locked in the scrum because of the one man advantage , .you call an 8-9 move with the loosies locked in ..you would walk a try in..
-
How could you not own a 6 man scrum..?.wtf ..!
-
Why doesn't Otago have to throw straight into the lineout?