• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

'Super Rugby' 2021

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
1.9k Posts 81 Posters 133.9k Views
'Super Rugby' 2021
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • D Offline
    D Offline
    Derpus
    replied to sparky on last edited by
    #729

    @sparky I thought any player is capped at a maximum of 30 games per year? (dont quote me)

    sparkyS 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • sparkyS Offline
    sparkyS Offline
    sparky
    replied to Derpus on last edited by
    #730

    @Derpus Won't happen in 2021. But imagine the South Stand rocking for five/six games of SR a year.

    (Off Topic a bit: My reading of the Hong Kong situation is that the Chinese strategy is crackdown now, followed by a relaxation to come).

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • sparkyS Offline
    sparkyS Offline
    sparky
    replied to Derpus on last edited by sparky
    #731

    @Derpus said in 'Super Rugby' 2021:

    @sparky I thought any player is capped at a maximum of 30 games per year? (dont quote me)

    69 Games total. No player would play more than 13 games of Super Rugby a year, allowing for involvement in Internationals, Tours, North Vs South games and even the NPC.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • sharkS Offline
    sharkS Offline
    shark
    replied to Kiwiwomble on last edited by
    #732

    @Kiwiwomble said in 'Super Rugby' 2021:

    @booboo i know i'm continuously explaining the difference between Union and League to well meaning aussies when they try engage in some rugby chat, thats melbourne thought

    But they know they're different sports. And I'm sure they know which one has an international profile and which doesn't. Explaining the difference is something else entirely. The point is, I reckon if the Storm and the Rebels each played a final at the MCG; the Storm vs the Roosters and the Rebels vs the Crusaders - with the proviso that they're equally well marketed - the latter would draw a much larger crowd because the game has an international profile and that would spin their wheels hard. Likewise a BC test vs a Kiwis vs Kangaroos test. And lastly, if you asked your average Victorian which of the two Australia national sides they knew of, the vast majority would say the Wallabies.

    D J boobooB 3 Replies Last reply
    1
  • KiwiwombleK Online
    KiwiwombleK Online
    Kiwiwomble
    wrote on last edited by Kiwiwomble
    #733

    i dont know if i agree with that, lots aren’t 100% that they are different sports, not with the people i talk too, I think they identify with the club approach like the nrl rather than the region approach or rugby

    even if they did i dont know if international sport is an attraction...Melbournians love the AFL even thought its barely followed outside Melbourne let alone aus

    ChrisC 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • sharkS Offline
    sharkS Offline
    shark
    wrote on last edited by
    #734

    I lived in Melbourne in 2002 and 2003. There was a buzz around the city in 2003 for the RWC. The All Blacks were based there and drew a lot of media attention. The locals curiosity was piqued, beyond a doubt. And then you look at the crowds that have been drawn to BC and Lions tests. Huge travelling contingents for sure, but plenty of local fans as well.

    KiwiwombleK 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • D Offline
    D Offline
    Derpus
    replied to shark on last edited by Derpus
    #735

    @shark I agree with this. I think there are loads of latent fans that just switched off because Rugby management in Aus couldnt run a piss up in a brothel and it's been run into the ground. If we could:

    a) get our best players back;
    b) get the bigger games on FTA with effective marketing;
    c) win the occasional thing; and
    d) deport Phil Kearns

    the crowds would come back, and quickly.

    Only 20 years ago that the Bled was played in front of 110k.

    1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • KiwiwombleK Online
    KiwiwombleK Online
    Kiwiwomble
    replied to shark on last edited by
    #736

    @shark i think a lot has changed in the last 17 years, we're talking about a time when Aussies teams we're up there, the brumbies won it in 2001 and 2004 plus obviously the WC so i bet there was a bit of hype

    the A-League has started since then and now had three teams in melbourne, one of which is the comps most successful team so that draws off a bit of winter support too

    i think short of the Rebels actually being a contender...marketing might not be enough nd even

    J 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • J Offline
    J Offline
    junior
    replied to shark on last edited by
    #737

    @shark said in 'Super Rugby' 2021:

    @Kiwiwomble said in 'Super Rugby' 2021:

    @booboo i know i'm continuously explaining the difference between Union and League to well meaning aussies when they try engage in some rugby chat, thats melbourne thought

    But they know they're different sports. And I'm sure they know which one has an international profile and which doesn't. Explaining the difference is something else entirely. The point is, I reckon if the Storm and the Rebels each played a final at the MCG; the Storm vs the Roosters and the Rebels vs the Crusaders - with the proviso that they're equally well marketed - the latter would draw a much larger crowd because the game has an international profile and that would spin their wheels hard. Likewise a BC test vs a Kiwis vs Kangaroos test. And lastly, if you asked your average Victorian which of the two Australia national sides they knew of, the vast majority would say the Wallabies.

    Yes, this is quite true, but less so in the last 10 years or so. In any event, people still won't care for a domestic rugby team, in the way that they can for an international team, because the domestic team plays (a) far more often and (b) often at the same times as an AFL game, both of which are a potential distraction from a Victorian's true passion, i.e. their AFL team.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • J Offline
    J Offline
    junior
    replied to Kiwiwomble on last edited by
    #738

    @Kiwiwomble said in 'Super Rugby' 2021:

    @shark i think a lot has changed in the last 17 years, we're talking about a time when Aussies teams we're up there, the brumbies won it in 2001 and 2004 plus obviously the WC so i bet there was a bit of hype

    the A-League has started since then and now had three teams in melbourne, one of which is the comps most successful team so that draws off a bit of winter support too

    i think short of the Rebels actually being a contender...marketing might not be enough nd even

    This and, like I said above, getting a decent crowd to watch the Wallabies during (a) a World Cup on home soil when they are defending champions or (b) a once every 12 year Lions tour, is a very different prospect to watching the Rebels week-in, week-out during the AFL season.

    Also, things have moved on massively in 17 years @shark. There just isn't the same level of interest in sports other than AFL anymore, particularly for unsuccessful teams.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • sharkS Offline
    sharkS Offline
    shark
    wrote on last edited by
    #739

    I have to defer to the opinions of those who have lived in Melbourne more recently than I, but I still maintain a Rebels team performing at a high level against all-comers would create a lot of interest. Whatever happened to the old saying that they could pack the MCG out for the opening of an envelope?

    KiwiwombleK J 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • KiwiwombleK Online
    KiwiwombleK Online
    Kiwiwomble
    replied to shark on last edited by Kiwiwomble
    #740

    @shark never heard that saying...but i imagine its easier with club memberships over 100k like Richmond (reported).but i will concede thats what they have to do if theyre ever to win over the crowd, real contenders onto of first class marketing and probably some clever scheduling so as not to go head to head with games at the G

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • KiwiwombleK Online
    KiwiwombleK Online
    Kiwiwomble
    wrote on last edited by Kiwiwomble
    #741

    just to removed any doubt, these are the reported memberships for the AFL clubs last year

    da4c2154-1fa2-479a-966f-53c544fe1977-image.png

    im sure there is some creative accounting but that is the size the the beast Rugby is trying to compete with in Melbourne even before you looks at the A-League and the Storm and hell, the VFL gets some ok crowds, i go to watch Port Melbourne more often than anything else

    there were multiple games last season that were mid table, mid season, so not playoffs or teams on a great run of form...and we're over 80k in the ground...they love their clubs

    antipodeanA J 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • ChrisC Offline
    ChrisC Offline
    Chris
    replied to Kiwiwomble on last edited by
    #742

    @Kiwiwomble said in 'Super Rugby' 2021:

    i dont know if i agree with that, lots aren’t 100% that they are different sports, not with the people i talk too, I think they identify with the club approach like the nrl rather than the region approach or rugby

    even if they did i dont know if international sport is an attraction...Melbournians love the AFL even thought its barely followed outside Melbourne let alone aus

    @Kiwiwomble said in 'Super Rugby' 2021:

    i dont know if i agree with that, lots aren’t 100% that they are different sports, not with the people i talk too, I think they identify with the club approach like the nrl rather than the region approach or rugby

    even if they did i dont know if international sport is an attraction...Melbournians love the AFL even thought its barely followed outside Melbourne let alone aus

    AFL has a big foothold in Qld now, AFL pick up the best athletes in QLd,cricket .is finding it hard to compete
    Being in the QLd cricket system we always lose top athletes to AFL it has a great marketing strategy.

    KiwiwombleK 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • KiwiwombleK Online
    KiwiwombleK Online
    Kiwiwomble
    replied to Chris on last edited by
    #743

    @Chris not surprised, the AFL goes out of its way to help the out of state and newer teams, priority draft picks, out of state payments etc

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • antipodeanA Online
    antipodeanA Online
    antipodean
    replied to Kiwiwomble on last edited by
    #744

    @Kiwiwomble said in 'Super Rugby' 2021:

    just to removed any doubt, these are the reported memberships for the AFL clubs last year

    da4c2154-1fa2-479a-966f-53c544fe1977-image.png

    im sure there is some creative accounting but that is the size the the beast Rugby is trying to compete with in Melbourne even before you looks at the A-League and the Storm and hell, the VFL gets some ok crowds, i go to watch Port Melbourne more often than anything else

    there were multiple games last season that were mid table, mid season, so not playoffs or teams on a great run of form...and we're over 80k in the ground...they love their clubs

    Yet more proof that the GC is where sporting teams die.

    KiwiwombleK 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • KiwiwombleK Online
    KiwiwombleK Online
    Kiwiwomble
    replied to antipodean on last edited by
    #745

    @antipodean will be interesting if it changes next year, the Suns have had some good results

    antipodeanA 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • antipodeanA Online
    antipodeanA Online
    antipodean
    replied to Kiwiwomble on last edited by
    #746

    @Kiwiwomble said in 'Super Rugby' 2021:

    @antipodean will be interesting if it changes next year, the Suns have had some good results

    Won't change a thing. The GC is where sporting teams die. The AFL has been here before with the Bears. They'll be propping up this team forever unless they can find another Melbourne team to merge with it and relocate.

    It's the same with basketball, rugby, league, soccer, tiddlywinks. The GC isn't interested.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • StargazerS Offline
    StargazerS Offline
    Stargazer
    wrote on last edited by
    #747

    Brutal Super Rugby Aotearoa opens door for Rugby Australia in trans- Ta$man negotiations

    SnowyS KirwanK 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • SnowyS Offline
    SnowyS Offline
    Snowy
    replied to Stargazer on last edited by
    #748

    @Stargazer said in 'Super Rugby' 2021:

    Brutal Super Rugby Aotearoa opens door for Rugby Australia in trans- Ta$man negotiations

    So we are saying that we need some soft cocks to fill in the gaps? Bring on the Force? Dilute the competition so that it is not worth watching? FFS.
    What happened to quality? Less is more, etc? Quality over quantity? Bigger crowds and more TB viewers.

    They have a chance to get this right, even if it means more bye weeks and fewer games for player recovery time.

    nzzpN 1 Reply Last reply
    1

'Super Rugby' 2021
Sports Talk
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.