• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

'Super Rugby' 2021

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
1.9k Posts 81 Posters 133.9k Views
'Super Rugby' 2021
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • D Offline
    D Offline
    Derpus
    wrote on last edited by
    #523

    Good to know NZRU are easily bought, then.

    all Australia bring to the table are teams that actually exist and are willing to participate.

    You need at least some of our teams and that gives us the leverage we need to say all or none.

    As ive alread said. Even if you are right, the cost to us of cutting another team is too great to ever accept. So NZRU can just cut the gordion knot and accept the simplest solution or we can all go down in a steaming heap of shit.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • barbarianB Offline
    barbarianB Offline
    barbarian
    wrote on last edited by
    #524

    When push comes to shove, surely the NZRU won't sink the whole comp just because they think the Force might be easybeats.

    While it's nice to see the quality of play factored into decision making, it would have been nicer for SANZAAR to have given it just one fkn iota of thought in the previous 15 years or so.

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • M Offline
    M Offline
    Machpants
    wrote on last edited by Machpants
    #525

    Yeah I reckon we'll have to end up with 5+5 and a PI to come, Ozzie won't take anything less, and the fact is there is no one else. I mentioned it at the start that any member of the NZR board needs to stop the drugs if they think Ozzie will take anything less than 4, and probably 5. It might not be best for a great comp, but it is political reality. In addition no way you could cobble together some random team of left over PI players for next season - with pre season starting in 6 month. I agree that NZR are right in that a comp with 5+3+1 would bne ideal. But we're not going to get it, and Ozzie media re right that we need them as much as they need us. The whole 'we invite expressions of interest' before even talking to SA, let alone Oz, is pretty shit. It should have been done behind closed doors.

    I'm just still hopeful this is all negotiation posturing, but maybe both boards are incompetent, over optimistic, jingoistic idiots. In a time of Covid we need real politik.

    1 Reply Last reply
    4
  • S Offline
    S Offline
    SidBarret
    wrote on last edited by
    #526

    Everyone seems to be focusing on the strength of the teams, but is there a window in current schedule for a 22 week tournament?

    March to May gives you about 13 weeks, June is incoming tours (can't see the NH agreeing to move those tests), July-August gives you 9 weeks, Sept-Oct for Rugby Championship and then Eoyt.

    So yeah it fits (just).

    That 9 week period in the middle of the season might suck with a lot of return matches between the top teams and the ones that are already out of the running.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • D Offline
    D Offline
    Derpus
    wrote on last edited by
    #527
    Tom Decent  /  Jul 21, 2020  /  Rugby Union

    Waratahs chairman unloads on New Zealand Rugby's 'appalling' ploy

    Waratahs chairman unloads on New Zealand Rugby's 'appalling' ploy

    Roger Davis has blasted NZR for approaching Australian Super Rugby sides behind Rugby Australia's back to play in a Kiwi-organised competition next year.

    Seems to be a bit of a rant but i gather NZRU have directly approached the franchises. Divide and conquer and all that.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • StargazerS Offline
    StargazerS Offline
    Stargazer
    wrote on last edited by
    #528

    I'd take everything the Aussie media write with a grain of salt; they're even worse than the NZH.

    D 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • D Offline
    D Offline
    Derpus
    replied to Stargazer on last edited by Derpus
    #529

    @Stargazer I doubt they'd manufacture direct quotes though. That's treading into defamation territory.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • M Offline
    M Offline
    Machpants
    wrote on last edited by
    #530

    I think it is pretty bloody stupid going out an and antagonising potential partners, the NZR Board must be pretty far up their own arses. Not professional at all. Sure you have the results of a study, publish them, but to come out an say 'we might deign to let you in our comp' is just plain dumb. And now they've unleashed a shit storm, and the AR Board (who may well be as dumb) may cut of their nose to spite their face and tell NZR to fuck off, like the majority of their supporters and press have said.

    I'm pretty pissed by the whole thing, initially I thought it was just media bullshit, but it looks like NZR really beleive they can decide what Ozzie teams play rather than negotiate it.

    gt12G 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • gt12G Offline
    gt12G Offline
    gt12
    replied to Machpants on last edited by
    #531

    @Machpants

    I agree with some of that, but equally the Force were considered to be too weak/not useful for Super rugby before, so for RA to bet the house on them being back in the competition now seems strange.

    Personally, I’m happy enough with a 5+5 although I think a better comp would be two separate competitions followed by a finals series for Australasian champion. That’s three main sponsors and two competitions each, sharing spoils of the TV deal of one between us.

    It’s also expandable and could easily include SA plus future partners.

    NZRU, you can send my check in the mail.

    NepiaN 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • NepiaN Offline
    NepiaN Offline
    Nepia
    replied to gt12 on last edited by
    #532

    @gt12 yeah, seems weird that the Force are now the hill to die on when they weren’t even in Super rugby at the start of the year.

    D 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • D Offline
    D Offline
    Derpus
    replied to Nepia on last edited by Derpus
    #533
    This post is deleted!
    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • KirwanK Offline
    KirwanK Offline
    Kirwan
    wrote on last edited by
    #534

    This is starting to remind me of the good old days when the aussies stole the World Cup hosting because of the signage rules 🙂

    Next Bledisloe is going to be great.

    J 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • J Offline
    J Offline
    junior
    replied to Kirwan on last edited by
    #535

    @Kirwan said in 'Super Rugby' 2021:

    This is starting to remind me of the good old days when the aussies stole the World Cup hosting because of the signage rules 🙂

    Next Bledisloe is going to be great.

    I wonder how much of this is being drummed up as something it's not in order to concoct a narrative of discord and bring more interest to events on the field...?

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • D Offline
    D Offline
    Derpus
    wrote on last edited by
    #536

    Thing i dont really get is, if a couple of teams did decide to randomly abandon Australia and join the NZ comp - they wouldn't be any stronger than they are now? Sure NZ would have probably managed to destroy Australian rugby forever - but for what? Very confusing.

    S 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • S Offline
    S Offline
    SidBarret
    replied to Derpus on last edited by
    #537

    @Derpus I read the IRB constitution a while back and there was a provision in there that states a national union needs to sanction all games within their jurisdiction so its not really possible for say the waratahs to rebel against the wishes of the RA.

    J 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • J Offline
    J Offline
    junior
    replied to SidBarret on last edited by
    #538

    @SidBarret said in 'Super Rugby' 2021:

    @Derpus I read the IRB constitution a while back and there was a provision in there that states a national union needs to sanction all games within their jurisdiction so its not really possible for say the waratahs to rebel against the wishes of the RA.

    What does jurisdiction mean, though? Are you talking about a geographical area or something else?

    S 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • S Offline
    S Offline
    SidBarret
    replied to junior on last edited by
    #539

    @junior yeah that is what I meant in this case, ie RA would need to sanction any game played in Aus

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • sharkS Offline
    sharkS Offline
    shark
    wrote on last edited by
    #540

    It's all becoming a little mundane. Just organise the 5+5 comp - no conferences and a four team finals series - and let performances on the field do the talking. When we end up with four Kiwi sides in the finals, the point will be proven. The Pacifika idea is cute, but highly likely to be unsustainable, so shelve it.

    KirwanK D 2 Replies Last reply
    3
  • mofitzy_M Offline
    mofitzy_M Offline
    mofitzy_
    wrote on last edited by
    #541

    Can see a Pasifika side based in Hawaii working. One day anyway.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • KirwanK Offline
    KirwanK Offline
    Kirwan
    replied to shark on last edited by
    #542

    @shark said in 'Super Rugby' 2021:

    It's all becoming a little mundane. Just organise the 5+5 comp - no conferences and a four team finals series - and let performances on the field do the talking. When we end up with four Kiwi sides in the finals, the point will be proven. The Pacifika idea is cute, but highly likely to be unsustainable, so shelve it.

    This. No silly confirmed semi final spots for the much weaker Aussie conference, and for the PI team give a concrete date, eg 2022, to add that team, and maybe one from Japan to keep the teams even.

    For weaker teams, like the Chiefs 😉 , it will give them somebody to beat. (Getting in early)

    M StargazerS 2 Replies Last reply
    2

'Super Rugby' 2021
Sports Talk
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.