Hurricanes v Blues
-
@ACT-Crusader said in Hurricanes v Blues:
@Crazy-Horse said in Hurricanes v Blues:
I don't think it's good for the game that the Blues are holding all the good loose forwards. Somebody should think of the poor Crusaders having to play Sanders and Douglas on the weekend. Surely one of the Blues could be sent down to Christchurch to help them out.
Exactly. It was never going to be easy up against a big bruising loose trio unit of the Blues when we were missing Read, McCaw, Todd, Tuiali’i, Thorne and George Whitelock.
So many options for that last spot
-
Blues are crazy continuing to play Beauden at 15. From a Canes POV the less he gets the ball the better.
-
This is going to be a cracker. The race for second place; given where the Blues have been, coming second in this comp is a massive achievement. We've built a quality pack for the future, and shoudl continue to improve.
That said, this is an injury hit side. Missing a fair few people that could make a difference, and playing away. Canes selections seem 'interesting', but I can't see this being anything but an arm wrestle that is decided by a few points only.
-
-
@ACT-Crusader said in Hurricanes v Blues:
@Crazy-Horse said in Hurricanes v Blues:
I don't think it's good for the game that the Blues are holding all the good loose forwards. Somebody should think of the poor Crusaders having to play Sanders and Douglas on the weekend. Surely one of the Blues could be sent down to Christchurch to help them out.
Exactly. It was never going to be easy up against a big bruising loose trio unit of the Blues when we were missing Read, McCaw, Todd, Tuiali’i, Thorne and George Whitelock.
Some of them are not like the others.
-
-
-
@nzzp said in Hurricanes v Blues:
@Hooroo you'd hope so with our forward pack, but I have years of scarring about favouritism.
You have only lost one match this season against a formidable Canterbury team, who were favourites!
Live in the now! You got this!
-
Easy W for the Canes. 😁
-
-
Expecting our pack to get munched, and the Blues to pull away in the second half as they did last time. It's really difficult to stay in the game when you're on the back foot for 60 minutes, and we don't have the quality of the Crusaders to turn that around. I reckon the Blues are the real deal this year - that the Crusaders managed to turn that around in the last 20 minutes was a really special effort that not many teams are capable of.
That said, it should be a cracker. Jordie has been in fine form and has given our backs a heap more confidence since his return, so anythings possible.
-
@Tim said in Hurricanes v Blues:
@Hooroo Three of our regular loose forwards are out!
Basically our starting backrow from week 1 are all out.
I thought we'd move Papali'i to 6 this week and had Lamborn in at 7, but Papali'i has probably been the form openside in the comp, so it might be hard to move him from 7 right now.
-
@No-Quarter said in Hurricanes v Blues:
Blues are crazy continuing to play Beauden at 15. From a Canes POV the less he gets the ball the better.
Why punish your 10 who is playing well and who actually will be with the team next year?
-
@No-Quarter Home advantage is pretty huge, so I kind of like the Canes for this one - especially given that the Blues are missing a few big players.
Blues will be desperate to keep the heat on the Crusaders, while Canes will be desperate to get back on level terms with the Blues - points-wise.
Should be a cracker.
-
@KiwiMurph said in Hurricanes v Blues:
@No-Quarter said in Hurricanes v Blues:
Blues are crazy continuing to play Beauden at 15. From a Canes POV the less he gets the ball the better.
Why punish your 10 who is playing well and who actually will be with the team next year?
Depends if you want to actually win this year I guess? The more Beauden touches the ball at this level, the better he gets, and the more unstoppable the Blues will become. As it is he's struggling to get himself into the game from the back and his form hasn't picked up.
Black is playing pretty well but his ceiling is so much lower than Beauden's it's not even funny.
-
