• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

Super Rugby 2020

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
1.5k Posts 78 Posters 111.0k Views
Super Rugby 2020
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • mariner4lifeM Online
    mariner4lifeM Online
    mariner4life
    replied to nzzp on last edited by
    #1070

    @nzzp said in Super Rugby 2020:

    @Machpants said in Super Rugby 2020:

    Ugh my screen is stained with gwa

    Ginga With Attitude?

    Keep outta sunlight
    pale motherfucker with a red do
    from the gang called gingerz with attitude
    take my shirt off, take my hat off
    forget the sunscreen, my skin starts peeling off

    nzzpN 1 Reply Last reply
    6
  • nzzpN Offline
    nzzpN Offline
    nzzp
    replied to mariner4life on last edited by
    #1071

    @mariner4life brilliant

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • M Offline
    M Offline
    Machpants
    replied to nzzp on last edited by Machpants
    #1072

    @nzzp said in Super Rugby 2020:

    @Machpants said in Super Rugby 2020:

    Ugh my screen is stained with gwa

    Ginga With Attitude?

    Possibly? Just means Ginger in UK forces, maybe not a widespread term!

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • SnowyS Offline
    SnowyS Offline
    Snowy
    wrote on last edited by
    #1073

    @Machpants
    I preferred this:

    Gwa
    A 'Gwa' is a person with a general chernobyl look to them. They have a recessed chin, overbite, a sharp or overlarge nose, lazy eye and/or usually accompanied by other rat-like features. The recessed chin and overbite is mandatory. They are best determined by seeing a side profile. Its almost like their chin becomes one with their neck. Think of the movie "Gummo" or your typical trailer trash. The defination was created by Jennicartoon.com after noticing the evolving "look" of people. These "gwa's" got their name by basically looking like the only word they could spit past their stonehenge teeth would be "Gwa!"
    Holy shitballs! Look at the Gwa's picking through the dumpster!

    Apologies to the team above.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • M Offline
    M Offline
    Machpants
    wrote on last edited by
    #1074

    That’s probably accurate to what is meant , apparently (according to A.R.R.S.E. the army rumour service) it’s spelt ‘gwar’ in the forces

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurph
    wrote on last edited by
    #1075

    https://www.nzherald.co.nz/rugby/news/article.cfm?c_id=80&objectid=12335102

    antipodeanA 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • antipodeanA Online
    antipodeanA Online
    antipodean
    replied to KiwiMurph on last edited by
    #1076

    @KiwiMurph Good. I was concerned World Rugby's recent elections had them taken over by league lovers.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • BovidaeB Offline
    BovidaeB Offline
    Bovidae
    wrote on last edited by
    #1077

    Why?

    Highlanders coach Aaron Mauger has confirmed that New Zealand Rugby has tabled an NRL-style 'golden point' system to decide drawn games in Super Rugby Aotearoa.
    
    "It has been tabled by New Zealand Rugby and the coaches have been part of that discussion as well," Mauger said on Wednesday.
    
    "I think it's a great idea. It's great for the spectacle. You can get a clear winner or loser."
    
    The proposal is in line with NZ Rugby's commitment to being innovative in Super Rugby Aotearoa, and although major rule changes are unlikely to be made the golden-point system would add some spice to a 10-week competition that doesn't have a finals system.
    
    KiwiMurphK NepiaN 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurph
    replied to Bovidae on last edited by KiwiMurph
    #1078

    @Bovidae to minimise the chances of two teams on the same 'competition' points at the end of the 10 weeks?

    Plus one of the benefits of this 'comp' is you can trial a few ideas.

    BovidaeB 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • NepiaN Offline
    NepiaN Offline
    Nepia
    replied to Bovidae on last edited by
    #1079

    @Bovidae I think it sucks in state house rugby so I don't want it in rugby.

    A draw is a result.

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • BovidaeB Offline
    BovidaeB Offline
    Bovidae
    replied to KiwiMurph on last edited by
    #1080

    @KiwiMurph They could just use the same tie breakers as currently (who beats who, points differential).

    KiwiMurphK 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • TimT Away
    TimT Away
    Tim
    wrote on last edited by
    #1081

    Blues return to Eden Park after $30k fee waived

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurph
    replied to Bovidae on last edited by
    #1082

    @Bovidae said in Super Rugby 2020:

    @KiwiMurph They could just use the same tie breakers as currently (who beats who, points differential).

    Sure - but I don't think its a bad time to tweak these sort of things to see if fans like it.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • mariner4lifeM Online
    mariner4lifeM Online
    mariner4life
    wrote on last edited by
    #1083

    NRL fans fucking hate golden point

    KiwiMurphK 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurph
    replied to mariner4life on last edited by KiwiMurph
    #1084

    @mariner4life the ratings say otherwise apparently.

    From an article from November on NRL.

    Greenberg said reverting to a system where teams finish with a draw if scores are locked up after 80 minutes was not on the table.
    
    "No. There has been no discussion with me and certainly I have been a strong proponent for supporting the concept of golden point," he said.
    
    "The numbers speak for themselves. When you get to the end of 80 minutes our ratings numbers on both broadcast partners go through the roof when we hit that (golden point) period.
    
    "We understand what business we are in. We are in the entertainment business and we are going to continue to find ways to innovate the game and make sure fans are fully engaged with us."
    
    mariner4lifeM 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • mariner4lifeM Online
    mariner4lifeM Online
    mariner4life
    replied to KiwiMurph on last edited by
    #1085

    @KiwiMurph said in Super Rugby 2020:

    @mariner4life the ratings say otherwise apparently.

    From an article from November on NRL.

    Greenberg said reverting to a system where teams finish with a draw if scores are locked up after 80 minutes was not on the table.
    
    "No. There has been no discussion with me and certainly I have been a strong proponent for supporting the concept of golden point," he said.
    
    "The numbers speak for themselves. When you get to the end of 80 minutes our ratings numbers on both broadcast partners go through the roof when we hit that (golden point) period.
    
    "We understand what business we are in. We are in the entertainment business and we are going to continue to find ways to innovate the game and make sure fans are fully engaged with us."
    

    what? do they go up at fulltime of a drawn game?

    KiwiMurphK 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurph
    replied to mariner4life on last edited by KiwiMurph
    #1086

    @mariner4life the way I read that quote is the ratings during the golden point period of a game are higher than the ratings during the regulation (80 minute) period of same game.

    mariner4lifeM 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • mariner4lifeM Online
    mariner4lifeM Online
    mariner4life
    replied to KiwiMurph on last edited by
    #1087

    @KiwiMurph said in Super Rugby 2020:

    @mariner4life the way I read that quote is the ratings during the golden point period of a game are higher than the ratings during the regulation (80 minute) period of same game.

    i can't understand anyone turning on golden point, it's awful football. Two teams playing risk-free football to try and get close enough for shit field goal shot. The refs swallow the whistle and just allow offside after offside, especially on the field goal shot.

    BonesB 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • BonesB Online
    BonesB Online
    Bones
    replied to mariner4life on last edited by
    #1088

    @mariner4life yeah that doesn't make sense. How do you know a game has gone golden point if you're not watching it? Prolly tuned in to watch the game after or the final result and got tricked.

    Not sure I like the idea for super rugby but I guess that's the point. The excuse of making sure teams don't end up on the same points is rubbish though.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • antipodeanA Online
    antipodeanA Online
    antipodean
    wrote on last edited by
    #1089

    Who doesn't want to watch a sneaky dropped scrum for a penalty and then 40 hitups one off the ruck for a chance at a penalty or drop goal?

    Why not just end with the scores tied and then the ref can say which team irritated him the most.

    1 Reply Last reply
    5

Super Rugby 2020
Sports Talk
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.