Aussie Pro Rugby
-
@Bovidae said in Aussie Rugby:
@antipodean said in Aussie Rugby:
He hasn't been providing much in the way of on field leadership for a young Tahs team this year and I doubt Rennie would want him in the Wallaby squad.
Beale was a notable omission from the wider squad wasn't he?
Yes he was and I recall reading he admitted his own form wasn't where he'd like it to be.
-
@antipodean said in Aussie Rugby:
@Bovidae said in Aussie Rugby:
@antipodean said in Aussie Rugby:
He hasn't been providing much in the way of on field leadership for a young Tahs team this year and I doubt Rennie would want him in the Wallaby squad.
Beale was a notable omission from the wider squad wasn't he?
Yes he was and I recall reading he admitted his own form wasn't where he'd like it to be.
and where is that? He's a 30+ year old back that has never relied on his brain. And his form has been at best patchy except for a couple of purple patches, the most notable being 9 years ago.
the ARU should be stoked to have his salary off the books.
-
@mariner4life said in Aussie Rugby:
@barbarian it's completely unrealistic that a wealthy country like Australia, with its athletic people, weather, and outdoor lifestyle, can't have a professional rugby comp.
The entire thing is held back by narrow minded self interest. And this article reeks of it. If we can't have everything, then fuck it, we'll go back to club land.
That's the broader issue - the clubs have political power and want money. Expansion was a fuck up, as they found there were too many mouths to feed in terms of players who didn't do it for the love of the game (egad!) or the administrators' junket desires. In the last 5 years sections of Sydney Premier Rugby has done its best to undermine the NRC.
So I see the point of the article, which is sort of along the lines of my own thinking: if the clubs think they can do it, then fucking pull the pin on that grenade and throw it.
They're going to need to take a serious look at how they're structured tho - my aforementioned comments are pertinent about playing out of derelict cowsheds, not much in the way of sustainable capital in the face of running 7 teams per club, 6 of which are amateur and 1 of which is semipro at best.
Then you've got Suburban clubs who have more money and more willing backers than the "Big" boys, who might fancy a crack at promotion for a cash grab. A lot of the First Division clubs would challenge for a Top 6 spot in Premier Rugby at First Grade level.
After that, the issue is Subbies is no longer amateur, which IMHO has actually served the system very well in keeping park footy alive.
-
News Ltd continues its attack on RA and Castle:
Rugby Australia, Raelene Castle spent $1m on failed broadcast negotiations
Rugby Australia last year paid close to $1m to broadcast rights strategists, who ultimately rejected a $US25m-a-year TV deal and then failed to secure a bid for the beleaguered code.
Former chief executive Raelene Castle hired Shane Mattiske and Michael Tange, who pushed RA to walk away from a five-year deal with Fox Sports last November in the hope of starting a bidding war. It never materialised.
It was revealed last week that Optus was never seriously in the running for the broadcast rights.
Today rugby faces financial collapse as Optus and Fox Sports (owned by News Corp, publisher of The Australian) turn their back on the struggling code, leaving the game with few if any options for broadcasting beyond 2020.
The Australian on Monday revealed a document affirming RA’s dire financial situation, which has the code staring at liabilities well in excess of $20m and facing insolvency. The game has blown $500m over the last four years and currently has no assets, no firm competition start date and no broadcast deal.
-
@antipodean said in Aussie Rugby:
The game has blown $500m over the last four years and currently has no assets, no firm competition start date and no broadcast deal.
Think I saw another figure quoting income was just over $500m for the same period, so yeah whatever Murdoch.
-
The captains are at it again
The 10 dissident Wallabies captains are threatening to revive their threat to propose a special general meeting of Rugby Australia members unless RA chairman Paul McLean and his directors honour promises made by former board member Peter Wiggs before he resigned from the board. The threat was contained in a letter distributed by Rugby Union Players Association chief executive Justin Harrison on behalf of the 10 captains on Tuesday to member unions and Super Rugby chief executives. A copy of his letter was leaked to The Australian. Wiggs was seemingly on his way to becoming RA chairman when he met with former Wallabies captains Nick Farr-Jones and Phil Kearns and Harrison on April 27. At that meeting, which the captains describe as “very positive”, Wiggs gave the players a number of undertakings that RA would: • Confirm a review process, consistent with the one outlined in the captains’ Australian Rugby Review Board charter. • Form three operating committees in the areas of 1) finance, business and governance; 2) current financial position, efficiencies, forecasts, relationships with member unions, options for appropriate corporate structures, etc; and 3) broadcasting, sponsors and relationships, creation and management of external relationships with parties to bring the required capital to the game, “Community to Wallaby”, rebuilding the links with our grassroots clubs, developing viable competition structures, revisiting performance at all levels, including high performance. Wiggs was, at the time, preparing for a “deep dive” into RA financial records. -
@KiwiMurph They want the current interim chairman to be held to promises that may have been made by a bloke who spat the dummy after five minutes in the job? Are these clowns retarded?
-
@antipodean said in Aussie Rugby:
@KiwiMurph They want the current interim chairman to be held to promises that may have been made by a bloke who spat the dummy after five minutes in the job? Are these clowns retarded?
yes.
-
@antipodean said in Aussie Rugby:
Are these clowns retarded?
Rugby Union Players Association chief executive Justin Harrison
Yes.
-
fuck it, give them the keys. here you go fluffybunnies, you do a better job.
-
@mariner4life said in Aussie Rugby:
fuck it, give them the keys. here you go fluffybunnies, you do a better job.
you can't un-crash the car, though.
-
@nzzp said in Aussie Rugby:
@mariner4life said in Aussie Rugby:
fuck it, give them the keys. here you go fluffybunnies, you do a better job.
you can't un-crash the car, though.
because it's running so well now?
-
@mariner4life said in Aussie Rugby:
@nzzp said in Aussie Rugby:
@mariner4life said in Aussie Rugby:
fuck it, give them the keys. here you go fluffybunnies, you do a better job.
you can't un-crash the car, though.
because it's running so well now?
nah, but there's some hope. If you let those muppets loose, it's probably shut the door in a few months material.
It's important to NZ Rugby that Aus rugby is strong. We get real benefits from them - attendance at NZ games, TV revenue, and decent opposition to play against. We lose this at our peril - it's a tragedy what's been happening in the administration side of the game.
-
@mariner4life said in Aussie Rugby:
fuck it, give them the keys. here you go fluffybunnies, you do a better job.
Fuck yeah. Go mad you silly fluffybunnies.
Captains of industry and commerce think they know how to fix the game, yet almost all of them sat on various boards and committees and apparently let it run into the ground.
-
-
@nzzp yup you can be stood down without pay due to CV, and the gov picks up the wages. But they've refused the gov wages too.
SA were up front and gave everyone 3 weeks to either hand their notice in, or accept cuts. Ozzie and NZ have players unions that negotiator on their behalf, dunno about SA.
-
"Rugby players stood down after agent refuses to take pay cut"
Take a pay cut or you don't have a job. Seems a bit unusual - generally taking pay cuts is voluntary, and doesn't necessarily count against you if redundancies happen.
Still, I"m not an expert in Australian employment law so who knows
