• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

Cricket: NZ vs Aus

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
cricket
1.4k Posts 62 Posters 106.2k Views
Cricket: NZ vs Aus
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • DamoD Offline
    DamoD Offline
    Damo
    wrote on last edited by
    #939

    Santner is really batting for his future here.

    If he doesn't go on to get a 50 he's probably done in tests for a while.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • L Offline
    L Offline
    LABCAT
    wrote on last edited by
    #940

    He should be done in tests as it is. Unless he can bat in the top six he is not a good enough bowler to be in the test team.

    1 Reply Last reply
    5
  • boobooB Offline
    boobooB Offline
    booboo
    wrote on last edited by
    #941

    Woohoo Tommy Blundell

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • No QuarterN Online
    No QuarterN Online
    No Quarter
    wrote on last edited by
    #942

    The first NZer to score a test hundred at the MCG. That's a famous innings, and one of the most well deserved tons I've ever watched.

    1 Reply Last reply
    5
  • boobooB Offline
    boobooB Offline
    booboo
    wrote on last edited by
    #943

    Only 278 to win

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.
    wrote on last edited by
    #944

    Great stuff, Blundell!

    Finally some batting to cheer about.

    Just wish Kane was still in there with him on 98*! 🙂

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurph
    wrote on last edited by
    #945

    Blundell is a gun. You can stay son.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • MokeyM Offline
    MokeyM Offline
    Mokey
    wrote on last edited by
    #946

    Splendid from Blundell. Have to say, the Aussie commentators on Radio sport have been good. They mocked that lbw a lot, and given a lot of praise to Blundell. No rah rah crap.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • No QuarterN Online
    No QuarterN Online
    No Quarter
    wrote on last edited by
    #947

    That really is an unbelievable innings in the context of this game and the series. Just awesome.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • MokeyM Offline
    MokeyM Offline
    Mokey
    wrote on last edited by
    #948

    No matter what happens with the game, no one can ever take away from Blundell that he scored a century against a full strength Australia at the MCG. Something to savour forever.

    1 Reply Last reply
    4
  • KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurph
    wrote on last edited by
    #949

    Santner did well to hang in there for Blundell to get his ton.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • SnowyS Offline
    SnowyS Offline
    Snowy
    replied to Godder on last edited by
    #950

    @Godder said in Cricket: NZ vs Aus:

    At least DRS means limited ability to saw us off. Limits blame a bit though...

    We've sawn our selves off really, but they have certainly tried their best and should be held accountable.

    Adds to the DRS discussion when they are that incompetent.

    G 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • G Offline
    G Offline
    Godder
    replied to Snowy on last edited by
    #951

    @Snowy said in Cricket: NZ vs Aus:

    @Godder said in Cricket: NZ vs Aus:

    At least DRS means limited ability to saw us off. Limits blame a bit though...

    We've sawn our selves off really, but they have certainly tried their best and should be held accountable.

    Adds to the DRS discussion when they are that incompetent.

    For sure, hopefully the umpires' performance reviews make that point.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • canefanC Online
    canefanC Online
    canefan
    wrote on last edited by
    #952

    Blundell gets 100. An indictment on the selectors. The guy has 2 tonnes in 3 matches. Now we have keystone cops and Southee gets run out

    H 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • G Offline
    G Offline
    Gunner
    wrote on last edited by
    #953

    The one glaring positive to come from this 2nd embarrassing hiding in a row is Tom Blundell.
    The man who had never opened in a first class match before, brought in to open against a red hot bowling attack and shows up all of our established batsmen.

    You bloody ripper.

    That only leave the spinners spot to sort out. No more persisting with Santner, surely?!?!

    boobooB 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • L Offline
    L Offline
    LABCAT
    wrote on last edited by
    #954

    Well Boult has to go home so if the selectors have any sense they will choose a real spinner not a "batting all rounder".

    SnowyS 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • MokeyM Offline
    MokeyM Offline
    Mokey
    wrote on last edited by
    #955

    There is something extra annoying about a player getting run out in a test match right near the end of day 4. Stupid stupid STUPID.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • M Offline
    M Offline
    Machpants
    wrote on last edited by
    #956

    So I'm back from the beach, a few beers, have we won yet?

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • MokeyM Offline
    MokeyM Offline
    Mokey
    wrote on last edited by
    #957

    Blundell scored half our runs. Nicholls, Watling, and Santner another 82. Remaining six scored 27 runs between them. Unacceptable.

    No QuarterN 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • SnowyS Offline
    SnowyS Offline
    Snowy
    replied to LABCAT on last edited by
    #958

    @LABCAT said in Cricket: NZ vs Aus:

    Well Boult has to go home so if the selectors have any sense they will choose a real spinner not a "batting all rounder".

    Maybe Ajaz is whitebaiting somewhere.

    1 Reply Last reply
    3

Cricket: NZ vs Aus
Sports Talk
cricket
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.