• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

Cricket: NZ vs England

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
cricket
693 Posts 57 Posters 40.4k Views
Cricket: NZ vs England
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • rotatedR Offline
    rotatedR Offline
    rotated
    replied to booboo on last edited by
    #609

    @booboo said in Cricket: NZ vs England:

    70 overs at 2.5 = Target of 150 @ 7.5
    Possibly achievable

    With no restrictions on ultra defensive fields, more latitude to bowl negatively and the ability to bowl Wagner unchanged at one end 7.5 RPO would be bloody difficult.

    boobooB 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • boobooB Online
    boobooB Online
    booboo
    replied to rotated on last edited by
    #610

    @rotated said in Cricket: NZ vs England:

    @booboo said in Cricket: NZ vs England:

    70 overs at 2.5 = Target of 150 @ 7.5
    Possibly achievable

    With no restrictions on ultra defensive fields, more latitude to bowl negatively and the ability to bowl Wagner unchanged at one end 7.5 RPO would be bloody difficult.

    True. But it is conceivable.

    Only a few overs and runs each way and it gets considerably easier/harder.

    I've also just realised I didn't take the 3 overs for change of innings out. Although that doesn't happen if it coincides with tea break I think.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • CyclopsC Offline
    CyclopsC Offline
    Cyclops
    replied to booboo on last edited by
    #611

    @booboo said in Cricket: NZ vs England:

    Crunched some numbers and I reckon we have to bat to midway of the last session to be safe.

    75 overs at 2.5rpo = 187
    Plus 76 on the board
    Less 101 deficit
    Target = 163 in 15 overs = 10.9 rpo
    Would think that's safe.

    70 overs at 2.5 = Target of 150 @ 7.5
    Possibly achievable

    We have 96 on the board not 76 so that wipes out a few extra overs, but play will start early so there will be more than 90 overs required. (ignoring the weather forecast that others have noted).

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • DonsteppaD Offline
    DonsteppaD Offline
    Donsteppa
    wrote on last edited by
    #612

    Effectively 12/2. A very retro Black Caps scoreline with R A Ndom and M S Cellaneous 90's Black Caps openers back in the pavilion.

    Handy of Pope to drop Williamson.

    No QuarterN 1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • CyclopsC Offline
    CyclopsC Offline
    Cyclops
    wrote on last edited by
    #613

    Rattling along at around 4 an over this morning.

    While that's good for the lead, probably also a sign that the pitch is flattening out and the range of chaseable totals is higher than what we might have thought yesterday.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • No QuarterN Offline
    No QuarterN Offline
    No Quarter
    replied to Donsteppa on last edited by No Quarter
    #614

    @Donsteppa said in Cricket: NZ vs England:

    Effectively 12/2. A very retro Black Caps scoreline with R A Ndom and M S Cellaneous 90's Black Caps openers back in the pavilion.

    Handy of Pope to drop Williamson.

    That was such a bad drop. I get people make mistakes, but his whole technique was terrible - poor body position, moved late, hands in the wrong position. Is he an actual keeper or a batsmen that keeps a bit?

    CyclopsC 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • CyclopsC Offline
    CyclopsC Offline
    Cyclops
    replied to No Quarter on last edited by
    #615

    @No-Quarter said in Cricket: NZ vs England:

    @Donsteppa said in Cricket: NZ vs England:

    Effectively 12/2. A very retro Black Caps scoreline with R A Ndom and M S Cellaneous 90's Black Caps openers back in the pavilion.

    Handy of Pope to drop Williamson.

    That was such a bad drop. I get people make mistakes, but his whole technique was terrible - poor body position, moved late, hands in the wrong position. Is he an actual keeper or a batsmen that keeps a bit?

    Batsman that keeps a bit. I think this is either his 5th or 6th time keeping in first class cricket. England didn't bring out a keeper to back up Buttler, favouring an extra batsman.

    No QuarterN 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • No QuarterN Offline
    No QuarterN Offline
    No Quarter
    replied to Cyclops on last edited by
    #616

    @Cyclops said in Cricket: NZ vs England:

    @No-Quarter said in Cricket: NZ vs England:

    @Donsteppa said in Cricket: NZ vs England:

    Effectively 12/2. A very retro Black Caps scoreline with R A Ndom and M S Cellaneous 90's Black Caps openers back in the pavilion.

    Handy of Pope to drop Williamson.

    That was such a bad drop. I get people make mistakes, but his whole technique was terrible - poor body position, moved late, hands in the wrong position. Is he an actual keeper or a batsmen that keeps a bit?

    Batsman that keeps a bit. I think this is either his 5th or 6th time keeping in first class cricket. England didn't bring out a keeper to back up Buttler, favouring an extra batsman.

    Very costly. You can get away with it in the shorter forms but bad keepers inevitably gets found out in the test arena. Dropping guys like Kane (or Kohli, Smith etc) who can just bat for days can cost you the game.

    Chris B.C 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • CrucialC Offline
    CrucialC Offline
    Crucial
    replied to booboo on last edited by
    #617

    @booboo said in Cricket: NZ vs England:

    Crunched some numbers and I reckon we have to bat to midway of the last session to be safe.

    75 overs at 3.1rpo = 232
    Plus 96 on the board
    Less 101 deficit
    Target = 227 in 23 overs = 9.9 rpo

    Have redone that calc.
    98 overs today.
    Run rate is ticking at just over 3
    Batting out 75 overs would be pretty comfortable

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.
    replied to No Quarter on last edited by Chris B.
    #618

    @No-Quarter I missed the Pope drop, but I'm guessing it's not as bad as the one that Denly just dropped off Kane.

    You'd get abused for dropping that one in tenth grade! 🙂

    CrucialC No QuarterN 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • CrucialC Offline
    CrucialC Offline
    Crucial
    replied to Chris B. on last edited by
    #619

    @Chris-B said in Cricket: NZ vs England:

    @No-Quarter I missed the Pope drop, but I'm guessing it's not as bad as the one that Denly just dropped off Kane.

    You'd get abused for dropping that one in tenth grade! 🙂

    Cricinfo says....So, so village. The worst drop by an England fielder since Mike Gatting on the India tour in 1992-93 (YouTube it...)

    So I did.

    Chris B.C 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • CrucialC Offline
    CrucialC Offline
    Crucial
    wrote on last edited by
    #620

    Shouldn't have searched youtube.

    Here are some even funnier ones..

    CyclopsC 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.
    replied to Crucial on last edited by
    #621

    @Crucial Gatting's is marginally worse - not improved by him glancing up as though "the sun was in my eyes".

    I'd imagine The Sun was giving him a big boot in the arse the next day!

    CrucialC 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • CrucialC Offline
    CrucialC Offline
    Crucial
    replied to Chris B. on last edited by
    #622

    @Chris-B said in Cricket: NZ vs England:

    @Crucial Gatting's is marginally worse - not improved by him glancing up as though "the sun was in my eyes".

    I'd imagine The Sun was giving him a big boot in the arse the next day!

    You'd need a big boot for his big arse.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • CrucialC Offline
    CrucialC Offline
    Crucial
    wrote on last edited by
    #623

    These two showing why they top the alltime stats lists for NZ batting.
    Hope they take the chance to add to the books.

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • CyclopsC Offline
    CyclopsC Offline
    Cyclops
    replied to Crucial on last edited by
    #624

    @Crucial said in Cricket: NZ vs England:

    Shouldn't have searched youtube.

    Here are some even funnier ones..

    I don't know what's worse. That fielding or the fact that we clearly got thumped despite probably having to be dismissed about twice for each wicket.

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • CrucialC Offline
    CrucialC Offline
    Crucial
    wrote on last edited by
    #625

    I think Taylor is very close to surpassing the 7000 mark in tests if you can find a TV

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • CyclopsC Offline
    CyclopsC Offline
    Cyclops
    wrote on last edited by
    #626

    Found the scorecard for that craptravaganza.

    Looks like we were at risk of losing by more than Pakistan managed to score in either innings at one point.

    Looking through that lineup it would be a contender for one of the worst in recent memory. Bowling lineup was okay, but the batting, and top order especially just dire.

    https://www.espncricinfo.com/series/13425/scorecard/423779/new-zealand-vs-pakistan-2nd-test-pakistan-tour-of-new-zealand-2009-10

    mariner4lifeM 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • CrucialC Offline
    CrucialC Offline
    Crucial
    wrote on last edited by
    #627

    Just looked at the scoring chart for Kane this innings and amazingly he has only scored 2 runs in the point to third man sector

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4life
    replied to Cyclops on last edited by
    #628

    @Cyclops pffft hahaha oh god that's just so bad. look a the averages in the top 6

    29
    27
    26
    46
    25
    11

    sing with me now "one of those things is not like the others, one of those things is not the same..."

    we, as supporters, really did earn this little purple patch.

    Chris B.C 1 Reply Last reply
    3

Cricket: NZ vs England
Sports Talk
cricket
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.