Surely there has to be a better way to decide for third spot
-
@The-Eagle holy shit, all the old cnuts coming out of the woodwork this week!
-
There's only one way to decide...a long table full of ice cold Steinlagers...Hansen and Gats drink as many as they can and the first to go to the loo loses.
-
@nzzp said in Surely there has to be a better way to decide for third spot:
@Blackheart said in Surely there has to be a better way to decide for third spot:
Than a humiliating game that neither side wants to play. I'm sure all the Welsh and ABs want to do is go home and get over their Semi final loss.
Just calculate who has the most points overall and give them the bronze.
Boat races!
Played in a 7's tournament in Cancun awhile back. We were so hungover at the actual event we got to a 3v 4 playoff or maybe 5v6 against a team called 'Off in church' we thought they were a religious team....nope just some witty blokes.
Apparently 'no one beats off in church'
We ended up having a boat race instead of the match and can say that we all beat off in church that day.
-
how about a count back on
boundariestries... that seems a fair way to do it.Sure both teams will be despondent in general, however Im sure the players will want to send their mates/coaches who are retiring off with a win.
-
I don't know why we need to worry about who comes third. There's the winners and the people who lost the final. Everything else is loser territory.
Seeding should be done a year before according to rankings.
-
@antipodean said in Surely there has to be a better way to decide for third spot:
I don't know why we need to worry about who comes third. There's the winners and the people who lost the final. Everything else is loser territory.
Seeding should be done a year before according to rankings.
If seedings were done a year before it would make a lot more sense
-
Paper,scissors, Rock, first to 10
-
Why even bother finding 3rd place. What relevance is there?
As an aside boxing doesn't have 3v4 at the Lumpics. Just two bronze medals.
Why make the players bash themselves up even more for meaningless match.
Seeding is done on rankings anyway.
-
@bayimports said in Surely there has to be a better way to decide for third spot:
@antipodean said in Surely there has to be a better way to decide for third spot:
I don't know why we need to worry about who comes third. There's the winners and the people who lost the final. Everything else is loser territory.
Seeding should be done a year before according to rankings.
If seedings were done a year before it would make a lot more sense
Yeah, it was probably a little far out, but better than results 4 year's previous.
-
-
@Siam said in Surely there has to be a better way to decide for third spot:
No cheating:
can you name all the " bronze medallists" in the history of RWC?
Nah, me neither
Wales
Us
England
South Africa
Us
Argentina
Australia
South AfricaAt a guess anyway, the first 3 are wild guesses
-
-
@mariner4life said in Surely there has to be a better way to decide for third spot:
@Siam said in Surely there has to be a better way to decide for third spot:
No cheating:
can you name all the " bronze medallists" in the history of RWC?
Nah, me neither
Wales
Us
England
South Africa
Us
Argentina
Australia
South AfricaAt a guess anyway, the first 3 are wild guesses
Good effort. One wrong. One of your wild guesses. They were 4th.
-
@Blackheart is there fucken anything you don't want to change?
-
